The Indian Constitution, under Article 368, allows amendments through addition, variation, or repeal to adapt to changing needs. Unlike Britain’s flexible or the USA’s rigid constitutions, India’s strikes a balance. The Supreme Court’s Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) established that amendments cannot alter the Constitution’s ‘basic structure’.
Aspect | Details |
Nature | Balances flexibility and rigidity, allowing changes while protecting the basic structure. |
Article 368 | Outlines Parliament’s powers to amend the Constitution through addition, variation, or repeal. |
Basic Structure | Amendments cannot touch the core framework of the Constitution, as per Kesavananda Bharati (1973). |
This framework ensures the Constitution remains adaptable yet stable, safeguarding its foundational principles.
The amendment process, detailed in Article 368, involves specific steps to ensure thorough approval while maintaining federal balance.
Step | Details |
Initiation | Only Parliament can initiate an amendment through a bill in either House (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha). |
Introduction | Bill can be introduced by a minister or private member without the President’s prior permission. |
Approval | Requires a special majority in each House: (i) Majority of total membership, (ii) Two-thirds of members present and voting. |
Separate Approval | Each House must pass the bill separately; no joint sitting is allowed for disagreements. |
State Ratification (if applicable) | Amendments affecting federal provisions need ratification by half of state legislatures with a simple majority. |
Presidential Assent | The President must give assent to the bill; no withholding or returning is allowed. |
Becoming an Act | Once assented, the bill becomes a constitutional amendment act, and the Constitution is updated. |
The procedure ensures a robust process, balancing parliamentary authority with state involvement for federal matters.
Article 368 outlines three types of amendments, each with distinct requirements based on the provisions being altered.
Type | Details |
By Simple Majority | Applies to specific provisions; requires a simple majority of members present and voting, similar to ordinary laws. Not considered under Article 368. |
By Special Majority | Requires a majority of total membership in each House and two-thirds of members present and voting. Covers Fundamental Rights, DPSPs, and other provisions. |
By Special Majority and State Ratification | Requires special majority in Parliament plus consent of half of state legislatures (simple majority). Applies to federal structure provisions. |
These types allow flexibility for minor changes and rigor for significant ones, ensuring a balanced approach.
Certain provisions can be amended with a simple majority, outside the scope of Article 368, similar to regular legislation.
Provision | Examples |
State Formation | Admission, creation, or alteration of state boundaries and names. |
Legislative Councils | Creation or abolition of legislative councils in states. |
Second Schedule | Emoluments, allowances, privileges of the President, governors, judges, etc. |
Parliamentary Procedures | Quorum, salaries, privileges, and rules of procedure in Parliament. |
Language | Use of English or official languages in Parliament. |
Judiciary | Number of Supreme Court judges and their jurisdiction. |
Citizenship | Acquisition and termination of citizenship. |
Elections | Elections to Parliament, state legislatures, and delimitation of constituencies. |
Territories and Schedules | Union territories, Fifth Schedule (scheduled areas/tribes), Sixth Schedule (tribal areas). |
Simple majority amendments allow quick adjustments for administrative and procedural matters.
Most constitutional provisions, including Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles, require a special majority for amendment.
Aspect | Details |
Special Majority | Majority of total membership in each House and two-thirds of members present and voting. |
Application | Covers Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles of State Policy, and provisions not requiring state ratification. |
Process | Applied at all significant stages, especially the third reading, to ensure broad support. |
Total Membership | Includes all members of the House, regardless of vacancies or absences. |
This method ensures significant changes have strong parliamentary backing, maintaining constitutional integrity.
Amendments affecting the federal structure require both parliamentary approval and state ratification.
Provision | Examples |
Election of President | Rules governing the President’s election process. |
Executive Power | Distribution of executive authority between Union and states. |
Judiciary | Rules concerning Supreme Court and High Courts. |
Legislative Powers | Division of law-making powers between Union and states. |
GST Council | Rules related to the Goods and Services Tax Council. |
Seventh Schedule | Lists categorizing subjects for legislation (Union, State, Concurrent). |
State Representation | Representation of states in Parliament. |
Amendment Procedure | Changes to Article 368 itself. |
State Consent | Requires simple majority approval from at least half of state legislatures; no time limit for consent. |
This process ensures federal changes reflect both national and state interests, preserving India’s federal structure.
The amendment process has faced criticism for its structure and limitations, though it balances flexibility and rigidity.
Criticism | Details |
No Special Body | No Constitutional Convention; Parliament holds primary amendment power. |
Parliament Initiation | Only Parliament can initiate amendments; states cannot, except for legislative councils. |
Broad Parliamentary Power | Most provisions can be amended by Parliament alone, with special or simple majority. |
No Time Frame for States | No deadline for state consent; unclear if states can retract approval. |
No Joint Sitting | No provision for joint sitting to resolve disagreements between Houses. |
Similar to Legislation | Amendment process mirrors regular bill passage, except for special majority. |
Sketchy Provisions | Amendment details lack clarity, leading to judicial interpretation. |
Balanced Approach | Balances flexibility and rigidity, allowing adaptation without easy changes. |
Facile Procedure | Relatively easy process compared to rigid systems like the USA, Canada, or Australia. |
Despite criticisms, the process allows necessary changes while maintaining constitutional stability.
142 videos|777 docs|202 tests
|
1. What is the procedure for amending the Constitution? | ![]() |
2. What are the different types of amendments to the Constitution? | ![]() |
3. What is meant by amendments by simple majority? | ![]() |
4. Can you explain the criticism surrounding the amendment procedure of the Constitution? | ![]() |
5. Why are special majority amendments considered more rigorous than simple majority amendments? | ![]() |