Current Affairs: Passage of the Day - 04 December 2024 | Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly - CLAT PDF Download

Directions: Read the passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
The top United Nations court took up the largest case in its history on Monday, when it opened two weeks of hearings into what countries worldwide are legally required to do to combat climate change and help vulnerable nations fight its devastating impact. After years of lobbying by island nations who fear they could simply disappear under rising sea waters, the UN General Assembly asked the International Court of Justice last year for an opinion on "the obligations of States in respect of climate change."
Any decision by the court would be non-binding advice and couldn't directly force wealthy nations into action to help struggling countries. Yet it would be more than just a powerful symbol since it could be the basis for other legal actions, including domestic lawsuits.
"We want the court to confirm that the conduct that has wrecked the climate is unlawful," Margaretha Wewerinke-Singh, who is leading the legal team for the Pacific island nation of Vanuatu, told The Associated Press.
In the decade up to 2023, sea levels have risen by a global average of around 4.3 centimeters (1.7 inches), with parts of the Pacific rising higher still. The world has also warmed 1.3 degrees Celsius (2.3 Fahrenheit) since preindustrial times because of the burning of fossil fuels.
Vanuatu is one of a group of small states pushing for international legal intervention in the climate crisis.
"We live on the front lines of climate change impact. We are witnesses to the destruction of our lands, our livelihoods, our culture and our human rights," Vanuatu's climate change envoy Ralph Regenvanu told reporters ahead of the hearing.
The Hague-based court will hear from 99 countries and more than a dozen intergovernmental organizations over two weeks. It's the largest lineup in the institution's nearly 80-year history.
Last month at the United Nations' annual climate meeting, countries cobbled together an agreement on how rich countries can support poor countries in the face of climate disasters. Wealthy countries have agreed to pool together at least $300 billion a year by 2035 but the total is short of the $1.3 trillion that experts, and threatened nations, said is needed.
"For our generation and for the Pacific Islands, the climate crisis is an existential threat. It is a matter of survival, and the world's biggest economies are not taking this crisis seriously. We need the ICJ to protect the rights of people at the front lines," said Vishal Prasad, of Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change.
Fifteen judges from around the world will seek to answer two questions: What are countries obliged to do under international law to protect the climate and environment from human-caused greenhouse gas emissions? And what are the legal consequences for governments where their acts, or lack of action, have significantly harmed the climate and environment?
The second question makes particular reference to "small island developing States" likely to be hardest hit by climate change and to "members of "the present and future generations affected by the adverse effects of climate change."
The judges were even briefed on the science behind rising global temperatures by the UN's climate change body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ahead of the hearings.
[Excerpt from TOI "Top UN Court Hears Landmark Climate Change Case" Dated 04/12/24]

Q1: Which nation spearheaded the initiative for the ICJ to provide an advisory opinion on climate change?
(a) Fiji
(b) Vanuatu
(c) Maldives
(d) Seychelles

  View Answer

Q2: What is the significance of the ICJ’s advisory opinions?
(a) They are legally binding for all nations.
(b) They set international penalties for non-compliance.
(c) They influence international law and guide national courts.
(d) They replace existing climate agreements.

  View Answer

Q3: What is a key argument presented by Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu’s climate envoy?
(a) The promotion of nuclear energy as an alternative.
(b) The legal recognition of historical emissions as illegal.
(c) The reduction of renewable energy usage.
(d) The withdrawal from international climate agreements.

  View Answer

Q4: Why are the ICJ hearings on climate change significant?
(a) They aim to finalize the Paris Agreement.
(b) They could set a global precedent for future climate lawsuits.
(c) They replace the outcomes of COP29.
(d) They create new climate treaties for small island nations.

  View Answer

Q5: Which major global stakeholders are participating in the ICJ hearings?
(a) ASEAN and the European Union
(b) NATO and the African Union
(c) The United States, China, and OPEC
(d) BRICS and G20 nations

  View Answer