CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Notes  >  Legal Reasoning for CLAT  >  Mnemomics: Contract Law

Mnemomics: Contract Law | Legal Reasoning for CLAT PDF Download

This document simplifies the essential elements and remedies of Contract Law using easy-to-remember memory tricks (mnemonics). Whether it’s understanding what makes a contract legally valid or knowing the remedies available when one is breached, these shortcuts are designed to help you grasp key concepts quickly and retain them effortlessly.
Mnemomics: Contract Law | Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Perfect for CLAT UG and other law entrance exams, this guide will boost your revision, improve recall, and make Contract Law feel much less intimidating. Use it alongside your regular study material to reinforce your learning and prepare smarter.

Essential Elements of a Valid Contract

Concept: A valid contract needs specific elements under Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act.

Mnemonic: “A COOL WOLF”

  • A – Agreement (offer + acceptance)
  • C – Consideration (something in return)
  • O – Object (lawful purpose)
  • O – Offeror/Offeree Competent (capacity: major, sound mind, not disqualified)
  • L – Lawful (not illegal or immoral)
  • W – Willing parties (free consent: no coercion, fraud, undue influence, misrepresentation, mistake)
  • F – Form (in writing/registration when law requires)

Explanation: For a contract to be valid, it must have a lawful offer and acceptance, consideration, competent parties (e.g., not minors), free consent (no coercion), a lawful object, clear terms, and an intention to create legal obligations. Some contracts need a specific form (e.g., written for property sales).

Remedies for Breach of Contract

Mnemonic:“DR SIP”

  • D - Damages: Get money for direct harm caused by the breach, not random issues.
    Example: Grumpy Gus gets money for being dropped off at the wrong spot, but not for his wife’s illness.
  • R - Rescission: Cancel the contract and claim compensation for losses.
    Example: Singer Aria skips her theatre performance, so manager Bouncy B cancels the contract and asks for money for losses.
  • S - Specific Performance: Court orders the breaching party to do what they promised, unless it’s personal, hard to supervise, or money is enough.
    Example: Landlord Larry must sell land as agreed, but not for personal or vague jobs.
  • I - Injunction: Court stops someone from breaking the contract, like working with others.
    Example: Gadget Gary is stopped from buying electricity from another company.
  • P - Quantum Meruit (Payment): Get paid for work done if the contract is broken or void.
    Example: Builder Betty gets money for half a stage she built.
The document Mnemomics: Contract Law | Legal Reasoning for CLAT is a part of the CLAT Course Legal Reasoning for CLAT.
All you need of CLAT at this link: CLAT
63 videos|172 docs|37 tests

FAQs on Mnemomics: Contract Law - Legal Reasoning for CLAT

1. What are the essential elements required for a contract to be considered valid?
Ans. A valid contract must have the following essential elements: offer, acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal relations, capacity to contract, and lawful object. An offer must be clear and specific, acceptance must be communicated clearly, consideration is the value exchanged, both parties must intend to enter a legal agreement, they must have the capacity to contract (age and mental competency), and the purpose of the contract must be legal.
2. What remedies are available for breach of contract?
Ans. Remedies for breach of contract include damages (compensatory, punitive, nominal), specific performance, rescission, and restitution. Compensatory damages aim to cover the loss incurred, punitive damages are meant to punish the breaching party, specific performance requires the breaching party to fulfill their contractual obligations, rescission cancels the contract, and restitution aims to restore the injured party to their original position before the contract.
3. How does consideration function in a contract?
Ans. Consideration is the value exchanged between parties in a contract. It can be in the form of money, services, goods, or a promise to do or refrain from doing something. For a contract to be enforceable, consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate, meaning that as long as something of value is exchanged, the contract can be valid.
4. Can a minor enter into a contract?
Ans. In most jurisdictions, a minor (under the age of 18) generally cannot enter into a legally binding contract. Contracts with minors are usually voidable at the minor's discretion. However, there are exceptions for necessities such as food, clothing, and shelter, where minors can be held liable.
5. What is the difference between void and voidable contracts?
Ans. A void contract is an agreement that is not legally enforceable from the moment it is created, often due to illegality or lack of essential elements. A voidable contract, on the other hand, is valid and enforceable until one party chooses to void it due to specific reasons such as misrepresentation or undue influence.
Related Searches

Sample Paper

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Semester Notes

,

mock tests for examination

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Mnemomics: Contract Law | Legal Reasoning for CLAT

,

Exam

,

Important questions

,

study material

,

Objective type Questions

,

Viva Questions

,

Extra Questions

,

Mnemomics: Contract Law | Legal Reasoning for CLAT

,

pdf

,

Summary

,

Free

,

MCQs

,

practice quizzes

,

Mnemomics: Contract Law | Legal Reasoning for CLAT

,

ppt

,

video lectures

,

past year papers

;