UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Notes  >  History Optional for UPSC (Notes)  >  Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy

Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes) PDF Download

Introduction

  • Before the 1830s, the Orientalists were in charge of the General Committee of Public Instruction (CGPI), established in 1823 to oversee education in Bengal.
  • The CGPI had ten members, divided into two groups:
  • The Orientalist group, led by H. T. Prinsep, supported Oriental literature.
  • The Anglicist group, or English Party, advocated for English as the medium of instruction.
  • The equal division made it hard for the committee to function smoothly.
  • With Charles Trevelyan’s appointment, resistance to Orientalist policies grew, leading to conflicts over fund allocation.
  • The committee often reached stalemates and had to refer disputes to the Governor General in Council.
  • T. B. Macaulay, Trevelyan’s future brother-in-law, was brought in to resolve these stalemates.
  • The debate involved comparing different viewpoints:
  • Intellectual improvement of natives through Western knowledge (Macaulay) vs. traditional knowledge (Wilson).
  • Patriarchal notions of what was best for natives.
  • Economic considerations of printing books in English or Oriental languages.
  • Perspective of liberty and access to superior knowledge.
  • As a member of the Executive Council, Macaulay presented his Minute on educational policy on February 2, 1835, supporting the Anglicist view.
  • Macaulay expressed disdain for Indian customs, claiming that European libraries outweighed native literature.
  • He emphasized the utility and importance of the English language, linking it to access to vast intellectual wealth.
  • Macaulay drew on examples from the European Renaissance and Russia to illustrate the benefits of knowledge diffusion and societal improvement.
  • He aimed to create a class of “brown Englishmen” to serve in the Company’s administration.
  • The Macaulay system focused on educating the upper classes in English, not the masses.
  • Macaulay believed in the “infiltration theory”, where English-educated individuals would enrich vernacular languages and literature.
  • This led to the development of vernacular languages alongside English education.

Macaulay's Arguments

  • Macaulay's arguments were largely an extension of Trevelyan's ideas.
  • He emphasized the need to use funds not only for 'reviving literature in India' but also for 'introducing and promoting knowledge of sciences'.
  • He believed that the initiative for sciences was being neglected due to excessive focus on literature.
  • He argued that the government's goal of 'intellectual improvement' for the natives could not be achieved through vernacular languages.
  • Macaulay deemed the natives as 'barbarous, superstitious and irrational'.
  • He considered vernacular languages to have little intrinsic value.
  • Macaulay pointed out the impracticality of translating works into numerous dialects.
  • He positioned English as the natural choice due to its 'ready access to vast intellectual wealth'.
  • Macaulay challenged the Orientalist approach of seeking native cooperation through the teaching of Sanskrit and Arabic.
  • He contended that natives were more interested in learning English.
  • Macaulay cited the willingness of natives to pay for English education.
  • He emphasized the economic value of Western learning in providing employment opportunities.
  • In contrast, he noted that Sanskrit and Arabic lacked such practical benefits.
  • Macaulay criticized the Orientalist policy for misleading students.
  • He highlighted the case of Sanskrit college students who complained about the lack of job prospects.
  • He concluded that English should be the language of knowledge dissemination.
  • Macaulay advocated for the removal of scholarships for traditional languages.
  • His vision was to create a class of intermediaries to bridge the gap between the British and the local population.
  • He aimed to promote English knowledge, virtue and ideals.

Question for Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy
Try yourself:
Which language did Macaulay advocate for as the medium of instruction in education?
View Solution

H.H. Wilson's Counterargument to Macaulay

  • Withdrawal of Funding: Wilson criticized the withdrawal of scholarships for colleges teaching native knowledge, viewing it as a breach of trust with Indians. He believed it undermined the goal of improving India intellectually, morally and religiously.
  • Anglicist Assumption: Wilson rejected the idea that natives were uninterested in their own language. He pointed out that Macaulay's minute led to a petition from 8,000 Muslims advocating for the continuation of the Madrassa.
  • Need for Stipends: Stipends were essential in India, where they were often the only means of livelihood for students. Wilson argued for their necessity, similar to practices in Britain.
  • Language of Instruction: Wilson believed English was too foreign for effective knowledge transfer. He advocated for instruction in familiar forms, allowing learned natives to gradually appreciate Western culture and learning.
  • Right to Demand Funding: Wilson contended that natives had the right to demand funding for studies they deemed important, as they were contributing revenue to the British.
  • Cultural Adoption: He envisioned a scenario where able pundits and maulvis would integrate English with Sanskrit and Arabic, critiquing their own systems and promoting European knowledge. This approach would lead to profound changes, surpassing a mere understanding of the English language.
  • Policy Adoption: A month after its circulation, Macaulay’s Minute became official policy when Governor General William Bentinck signed the resolution.
  • Resolution of 7 March 1835: Accepted Macaulay's viewpoint that the Company's Government should promote European literature and sciences in English. All funds were to be spent for this purpose.
  • Macaulay's Victory: This decision was a win for Macaulay against his opponents, particularly the Orientalists who favored instruction in Sanskrit, Arabic and Persian.
  • Impact on English Education: Bentinck's resolution led to measures that accelerated English education in India.
  • Freedom of Press Act (1825): Encouraged printing and publication of English books at low costs.
  • Abolition of Persian: Persian was replaced by English and Indian languages as the language of record in courts, disappointing the Muslim community.
  • Vernacular Development: The government made limited efforts to develop vernacular languages, leaving literature development to the needs of the local people.
  • James Thomason's Efforts (1843-53): In the North West Provinces (modern U.P.), Thomason promoted village education in vernacular languages.
  • Thomason abolished smaller English schools, confined English education to colleges, and taught subjects like mensuration and agricultural science in vernaculars.
  • Department of Education: Established for the inspection and improvement of indigenous schools, aiming to train personnel for the new Revenue and Public Works Departments.

Question for Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy
Try yourself:
What was the impact of Governor General William Bentinck's resolution of 7 March 1835 on education in India?
View Solution

The document Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes) is a part of the UPSC Course History Optional for UPSC (Notes).
All you need of UPSC at this link: UPSC
70 videos|815 docs

Top Courses for UPSC

FAQs on Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy - History Optional for UPSC (Notes)

1. What was the main issue at the heart of the Orientalist-Anglicist controversy?
Ans. The Orientalist-Anglicist controversy primarily revolved around the debate over educational policies in India during British colonial rule. Orientalists advocated for the promotion of traditional Indian knowledge and languages, emphasizing the importance of Indian culture and education. In contrast, Anglicists favored the introduction of Western education, particularly the English language and Western scientific knowledge, arguing that it would modernize and uplift Indian society.
2. Who were some prominent figures involved in the Orientalist-Anglicist controversy?
Ans. Key figures in the Orientalist-Anglicist controversy included William Jones and Sir William Macaulay. William Jones was a prominent Orientalist known for his work in Sanskrit and Indian literature. On the other hand, Sir William Macaulay was a leading Anglicist who significantly influenced educational policies with his infamous Minute on Indian Education in 1835, advocating for English as the medium of instruction.
3. What were the implications of the Orientalist-Anglicist debate on Indian society?
Ans. The implications of the Orientalist-Anglicist debate were profound for Indian society. The Anglicist approach led to the establishment of English as the medium of instruction, which resulted in a class of educated Indians who were more aligned with Western ideals. This created a cultural shift, leading to the rise of a new elite while alienating traditional scholars and practitioners of Indian knowledge systems. The controversy also influenced nationalist movements by fostering a renewed interest in Indian culture and literature.
4. How did the British government respond to the arguments of Orientalists and Anglicists?
Ans. The British government took a pragmatic approach to the arguments of Orientalists and Anglicists. Initially, it showed interest in promoting Oriental studies to better understand Indian culture and governance. However, as the need for administrative efficiency grew, the government gradually aligned more with Anglicist views, culminating in policies that favored English education and the introduction of Western sciences, ultimately shaping the educational landscape of colonial India.
5. What role did the Orientalist-Anglicist controversy play in the emergence of Indian nationalism?
Ans. The Orientalist-Anglicist controversy played a significant role in the emergence of Indian nationalism by highlighting the cultural and intellectual divide within Indian society. The conflict between promoting indigenous knowledge versus Western education stirred debates about identity and cultural pride. As educated Indians began to critique colonial policies, the revival of interest in Indian languages and traditions became a rallying point for nationalist movements, contributing to the broader struggle for independence from British rule.
70 videos|815 docs
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

Sample Paper

,

Objective type Questions

,

video lectures

,

Semester Notes

,

practice quizzes

,

Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes)

,

Summary

,

study material

,

MCQs

,

mock tests for examination

,

past year papers

,

Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes)

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy | History Optional for UPSC (Notes)

,

Viva Questions

,

pdf

,

Free

,

Extra Questions

,

Important questions

,

ppt

,

Exam

;