Simplifying tax rates should fix flaws in tobacco taxes while balancing the needs of the economy and public health.
As India marks eight years of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) since its introduction on July 1, 2017, it's an opportune moment to assess this significant reform. GST replaced various indirect taxes like VAT, excise duty, and service tax, consolidating them into a single system. This move facilitated the creation of a unified national market under the principle of “One Nation, One Tax.” The reform ensured uniform tax rates across states, simplified business operations, and strengthened economic connectivity among different regions of the country. Moreover, GST has proven to be a reliable source of revenue for the government, with gross collections reaching a record ₹22.08 lakh crore in 2024–25, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 9.4%.
Public Health Impact
Tobacco Revenue from GST
Tobacco Use in India
Role of Taxation
Pre-GST Tax Trend
Post-GST Situation
WHO Recommendation
Current Tax Burden in India
These rates are all below the standards recommended by the WHO.
Suggested Measures | Expected Impact |
Raise GST rate on tobacco to 40% | Matches the statutory maximum and helps reduce consumption |
Increase specific excise duties significantly | Adds a fixed charge per unit—more effective at reducing use and raising revenue |
Continue Compensation Cess or restructure it | Prevents a drop in overall tax burden post-2026 |
Implement WHO illicit trade protocolfully | Strengthens enforcement and compliance |
The world is undergoing significant changes that may not align with India’s traditional policies. It would be prudent for New Delhi to prepare for various scenarios and adapt to new global realities.
India’s foreign policy is currently facing a significant challenge. The anticipated return of the Trump administration, which was initially seen as beneficial for India, has disrupted the country’s diplomatic strategy. The recent conflict between India and Pakistan should serve as a wake-up call. With increasing evidence of military collaboration between China and Pakistan, including equipment transfers, India needs to be vigilant.
In addition to the China-Pakistan alliance, India’s stance on West Asia, particularly regarding the Israel-Iran conflict, requires serious reconsideration.
Until now, India has attempted to maintain a neutral position, but this approach has proven to be ineffective. With the United States taking a more active role in the region, the situation has escalated. The U.S. recently employed its GBU-57 bunker buster bomb for the first time to target Iran’s nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, and other underground sites.
Given this new reality, India’s neutrality may no longer be a viable option. Despite the announcement of a ceasefire, the possibility of a full-scale war remains high. India must reevaluate its position and prioritize its national interests.
The recent use of GBU-57 bunker buster bombs signifies a serious escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict. The previously sensitive topic of Iran's nuclear capabilities is now being openly discussed, raising concerns about global security. India's attempt to maintain neutrality in such a volatile situation is increasingly being questioned. This is not merely a wake-up call; it is a pressing global security challenge that requires immediate attention.
Issue | Impact on India |
---|---|
Neutral stance on Israel-Iran conflict | Makes India look like an outlier, not an active global player |
Global South leadership | Has brought little support during recent crises |
India-Pakistan conflict | Showed how India stood alone, despite past regional efforts |
China-Pakistan nuclear threat | Both neighbours are hostile nuclear powers, with no moral restraint |
Moral diplomacy | India's equidistance policy has made its moral voice weaker |
It is crucial for India to reassess the effectiveness of its neutrality in serving national interests. With diminishing benefits, a shift in foreign policy approach is necessary.
Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) policies are now affecting India negatively, extending beyond just trade and economic issues. After the India-Pakistan conflict in May, Trump claimed credit for facilitating a ceasefire, a narrative India disputes. This has created a diplomatic imbalance, as Pakistan’s Field Marshal Munir supports Trump’s role, contrasting with Modi’s silence on a US visit.
This situation risks driving India and the US towards conflicting paths, particularly in global diplomacy.
India’s attempt to balance its position in the Israel-Iran conflict has left it feeling isolated. Support for Israel has not yielded positive outcomes and is becoming a burden, while Iran, once an ally, is not receiving strong backing. This middle-ground approach is proving ineffective in the current geopolitical landscape.
Event | Key Message |
---|---|
Shangri-La Dialogue, Singapore | The world is shifting from soft power diplomacy to hard power politics. |
US Defence Secretary’s Speech | Emphasized a free Indo-Pacific and warned China against military aggression. |
Chinese Reaction | Asserted US non-interference in Taiwan and warned against provocation. |
The trend is moving away from consensus building towards military posturing. India needs to align its policies with this strategic realism and adapt to the changing global mood.
India’s neutrality is increasingly perceived as weakness, reflecting indecision rather than strength. The global landscape is less forgiving, with real-time conflicts testing alliances. A review of foreign policy is essential to navigate a more polarised and high-risk world. To remain relevant, India needs a clear stance, strategic partnerships, and firm diplomatic decisions.
India must prepare for various future conflicts, particularly after the May India-Pakistan clash, which was only a temporary pause. A thorough analysis of the strengthening and complex China-Pakistan military alliance is essential.
Focus Area
Similar to the UK, which recently evaluated its defence readiness, India should also review its capability to sustain prolonged conflicts. The UK's review underscored:
Prepare for a Two-Front War involving China and Pakistan.
Learn from the Russia-Ukraine war, focusing on supply chains, stockpiles, and modern warfare strategies.
Emphasize Artificial Intelligence (AI) in strategic decision-making and battlefield management.
Strengthen capabilities in:
While focusing on Pakistan, India should also analyze China’s recent white paper on “National Security in the ‘New Era’.” This document outlines China’s strategic thinking, emphasizing the close link between development and security, the need to protect scientific and technological security, and the importance of stable supply chains. It also highlights potential threats in China’s neighbouring regions.
China’s strategic partnership with Pakistan poses a significant challenge for India, especially given China’s nuclear superiority. With a nuclear warhead advantage of over 3:1, and nearly 5:1 when combining Chinese and Pakistani nuclear capabilities, India must take this threat seriously.
38 videos|5288 docs|1117 tests
|
1. What is the significance of GST reforms in relation to tobacco control? | ![]() |
2. How do higher taxes on tobacco products impact public health? | ![]() |
3. What are some challenges faced in implementing effective tobacco control measures? | ![]() |
4. How does the implementation of GST affect the pricing of tobacco products? | ![]() |
5. What role does public awareness play in tobacco control initiatives? | ![]() |