Table of contents |
|
Introduction |
|
The Struggle for Domination in North India: The Palas |
|
Pratiharas |
|
Rashtrakutas |
|
Political Ideas and Organization |
|
After Harsha’s empire declined in the 7th century, several large states emerged in northern India, the Deccan, and south India. Unlike the Gupta and Harsha empires, which controlled the Ganga valley and used its resources to dominate Gujarat and its trade, no northern kingdom fully united the Ganga valley after Harsha. In the south, the Cholas controlled the Krishna, Godavari, and Kaveri deltas, forming the basis of their power.
Between 750 and 1000 AD, three major empires arose: the Pala empire in eastern India, the Pratihara empire in western India and the upper Gangetic valley, and the Rashtrakuta empire in the Deccan. These empires often clashed but provided stability, extended agriculture, built ponds and canals, and supported arts and temples. The Rashtrakuta empire, the strongest and longest-lasting, acted as a bridge between north and south India in trade and culture.Age of Three Empires
(a) The Tripartite Struggle for Kanauj was between the Pratiharas of Central India, the Palas of Bengal and the Rashtrakutas from the Deccan.
(b) As all these three dynasties wanted to establish their supremacy over Kanauj and the fertile Gangetic Valley.
(c) The Tripartite Struggle lasted for 200 years and weakened all of them which enabled the Turks to overthrow them.
The Pala Empire emerged as a significant power in northern India following the decline of Harsha’s empire, marking a period of political instability in the region. This dynasty, originating in the 8th century, played a crucial role in shaping the history of eastern India through its military campaigns, cultural patronage, and trade connections.
1. Rulers of Pala Empire
2. Dominance in Eastern India: Palas ruled eastern India for about a century (mid-8th to mid-9th century), extending to Varanasi.
3. Military Strength: Arab merchant Sulaiman noted a large Pala army, possibly with 50,000 elephants (numbers may be exaggerated), though it’s unclear if it was a standing army or feudal levies.
4. Cultural Contributions:
5. Trade and Prosperity: Prosperous trade with Southeast Asia (Burma, Malaya, Java, Sumatra) brought gold and silver; the Buddhist Sailendra dynasty built a monastery at Nalanda with Devapala’s support, reflecting strong ties.
The Pratiharas were also called as Gurjara. They ruled between 8th and 11th century A.D. over I northern and western India. Pratiharas: A fortification-The Pratiharas stood as a fortification of India's defence against the hostility of the Muslims from the days of Junaid of Sind (725.A.D.) to Mahmud of Ghazni.
1. Rulers:
2. Dominance and Culture:
3. Decline of the Pratiharas
(a) Rajyapala was the last Pratihara king.
(b) Vast empire was reduced to Kanauj.
(c) The Pratihara power began to decline after Mahmud of Ghazni attacked the I kingdom in 1018 A.D.
(d) After the decline of the Prathiharas their feudatories Palas, Tomars, Chauhans, Rathors, Chandellas.
(e) Guhilas and Paramaras became independent rulers.
(f) There was complete anarchism in Bengal between 750-760 A.D.
4. Pratiharas were patrons of learning - Great poet Rajashekhar lived at court of Mahipala. Bhoja's grandson. Al-Masudi visited Gujarat from Baghdad in 915 and tells about Pratihara kingdom.
The Rashtrakutas were a remarkable dynasty that ruled the Deccan while the Palas and Pratiharas dominated northern India. Founded by Dantidurga, who established the capital at Manyakhet (Malkhed) near modern Sholapur, they controlled northern Maharashtra and engaged in conflicts with the Pratiharas over Gujarat and Malwa, and with the eastern Chalukyas, Pallavas, and Pandyas. Their rule lasted nearly 200 years until the 10th century.
1. Rulers of Rashtakutas Dynasty:
(i) Dantidurga: Founded the kingdom with capital at Malkhed (near Solapur). Dominated northern Maharashtra.
(ii) Govinda III annexed Kanauj, Malwa and turned South and defeated Lankan rulers.
(iii) Amoghvarsha: preferred pursuit of literature and religion than that of war. Wrote first Kannada book on poetics. Faced many rebellions in far-flung areas of empire. Empire weakened hereafter.
(iv) Indra III: amoghvarsha's grandson (915-927) re-established it. Fie was the most powerful ruler after death of Mahipala and sacking of Kanauj.
(v) Balhara or Vallabhraja: Al-Masudi says he was the greatest king of India and most Indian rulers accepted his suzerainty.
(v) Krishna III (934-963) was the last ruler.
2. Cultural and Religious Tolerance:
3. Art and Literature:
Administrative system was based on Gupta empire, Harsha's kingdom in the north and Chalukyas in the Deccan.
Palas and Pratiharas
Rashtrakuta Empire
Composition: Empires maintained large infantry, cavalry, and war-elephants, with Palas having the most elephants. Pratiharas and Rashtrakutas imported horses from Arabia, West Asia, Khurasan, and Central Asia, boasting the finest cavalry. War-chariots were obsolete.
Organization: Rashtrakutas had numerous forts with independent commanders. Infantry included regular, irregular, and vassal levies, with Palas recruiting from Malwa, Assam, south Gujarat, and Karnataka. Palas and possibly Rashtrakutas had navies, though details are scarce.
Structure: Empires included directly administered areas and vassal-ruled territories, where chiefs were autonomous internally but owed loyalty, tribute, and troops. Vassal sons might attend the overlord to prevent rebellion, and marriages with the overlord’s family were common.
Conflicts: Vassals often sought independence, leading to frequent wars, e.g., Rashtrakutas vs. Vengi and Karnataka chiefs, Pratiharas vs. Paramaras and Chandellas.
210 videos|853 docs|219 tests
|
1. What is the significance of the Old NCERT book by Satish Chandra in understanding the history of Northern India? | ![]() |
2. What is the difference between the Old NCERT book by Satish Chandra and the newer versions available in the market? | ![]() |
3. How can the Old NCERT book by Satish Chandra be useful for exam preparation? | ![]() |
4. Are there any limitations or drawbacks of relying solely on the Old NCERT book by Satish Chandra for studying Northern India's history? | ![]() |
5. Can the Old NCERT book by Satish Chandra be helpful for non-academic readers interested in Northern India's history? | ![]() |