Civil Engineering (CE) Exam  >  Civil Engineering (CE) Notes  >  Structural Analysis  >  The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE) PDF Download

Example 8.1 

Calculate the support reactions in the continuous beam ABC due to loading as shown in Fig. 8.2a. Assume EI to be constant throughout.

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

Select two reactions viz, at B(R1) and C(R2) as redundants, since the given beam is statically indeterminate to second degree. In this case the primary structure is a cantilever beam AC. The primary structure with a given loading is shown in Fig. 8.2b.

In the present case, the deflections (ΔL)1, and (ΔL)2  of the released structure at B and C can be readily calculated by moment-area method. Thus,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
and  The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

For the present problem the flexibility matrix is,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)                 (2)

In the actual problem the displacements at B and C are zero. Thus the compatibility conditions for the problem may be written as,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)               (3)

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)                (5)

Substituting the value of E and I in the above equation,

R1 =10.609kN and R2 = 3.620 kN

Using equations of static equilibrium,

R3 = 0.771 kN and R4 = −0.755 kN.m

Example 8.2 

A clamped beam AB of constant flexural rigidity is shown in Fig. 8.3a. The beam is subjected to a uniform distributed load of w kN/m and a central concentrated moment M = wL2 kN.m Draw shear force and bending moment diagrams by force method.

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

Select vertical reaction (R1) and the support moment (R2) at B as the redundants. The primary structure in this case is a cantilever beam which could be obtained by releasing the redundants R1 and R2. The R1 is assumed to be positive in the upward direction and R2 is is assumed to be positive in the counterclockwise direction. Now, calculate deflection at B due to only applied loading. Let (ΔL)1 be the transverse deflection at B and (ΔL)2 be the slope at B due to external loading. The positive directions of the selected redundants are shown in Fig. 8.3b.

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)
The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The deflection (ΔL)1 and (ΔL)2 of the released structure can be evaluated from unit load method. Thus,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)              (1)

and The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)              (2)

The negative sign indicates that (ΔL)1 is downwards and rotation (ΔL)2 is clockwise. Hence the vector {ΔL} is given by

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)              (3)

The flexibility matrix is evaluated by first applying unit load along redundant R1 and determining the deflections a11 and a21 corresponding to redundants Rand R2 respectively (see Fig. 8.3d). Thus,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)               (4)

Similarly, applying unit load in the direction of redundant R2,  one could evaluate flexibility coefficients a12 and a22 as as shown in Fig. 8.3c.

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE) (5)

Now the flexibility matrix is formulated as, 

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)            (6)

The inverse of flexibility matrix is formulated as,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The redundants are evaluated from equation (8.7). Hence,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)                       (7)

The other two reactions (R3 and R4) can be evaluated by equations of statics. Thus,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)       (8)

The bending moment and shear force diagrams are shown in Fig. 8.3g and Fig.8.3h respectively.

Summary

In this lesson, statically indeterminate beams of degree more than one is solved systematically using flexibility matrix method. Towards this end matrix notation is adopted. Few illustrative examples are solved to illustrate the procedure. After analyzing the continuous beam, reactions are calculated and bending moment diagrams are drawn.

The document The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE) is a part of the Civil Engineering (CE) Course Structural Analysis.
All you need of Civil Engineering (CE) at this link: Civil Engineering (CE)
34 videos|140 docs|31 tests

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

FAQs on The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 - Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

1. What is the Force Method of Analysis for beams and how does it work?
The Force Method of Analysis is a technique used to determine the internal forces and moments in a beam structure. It involves dividing the beam into smaller segments and applying equilibrium equations to determine the unknown forces at each section. By considering the compatibility conditions between adjacent segments, the method allows for the calculation of unknown forces and moments throughout the entire beam.
2. What are the advantages of using the Force Method of Analysis for beams?
There are several advantages to using the Force Method of Analysis for beams. Firstly, it is a versatile technique that can be applied to a wide range of beam structures, including those with varying cross-sections and supports. Additionally, it allows for the determination of internal forces and moments at any point along the beam, providing valuable insights into the structural behavior. Finally, the Force Method is often more efficient than other analysis methods for complex beam systems, as it reduces the number of unknowns and simplifies the calculations.
3. Are there any limitations or assumptions associated with the Force Method of Analysis for beams?
Yes, the Force Method of Analysis for beams has certain limitations and assumptions. Firstly, it assumes that the beam is linearly elastic and obeys Hooke's Law. It also assumes that the beam is subjected to static loading conditions, without considering dynamic effects such as vibrations. Additionally, the method assumes that the beam is initially straight and remains in the linear elastic range throughout the analysis. These assumptions may not be valid for all beam structures and loading scenarios, and should be carefully considered when applying the Force Method.
4. Can the Force Method of Analysis be used for indeterminate beams?
Yes, the Force Method of Analysis is particularly useful for analyzing indeterminate beams, i.e., beams with more unknowns than equilibrium equations. By introducing additional compatibility equations and considering the deformation compatibility between segments, the Force Method can solve for the unknown forces and moments in these complex beam systems. This makes it a powerful tool for analyzing structures with multiple supports and varying loading conditions.
5. Are there any software programs available for performing Force Method analysis on beams?
Yes, there are several software programs available that can assist in performing Force Method analysis on beams. These programs use numerical methods to solve the equilibrium and compatibility equations, allowing for quick and accurate determination of internal forces and moments. Some popular software options include SAP2000, ETABS, and STAAD.Pro. These programs often provide a user-friendly interface and graphical visualization of the results, making the analysis process more efficient and intuitive.
34 videos|140 docs|31 tests
Download as PDF
Explore Courses for Civil Engineering (CE) exam

Top Courses for Civil Engineering (CE)

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Related Searches

practice quizzes

,

Summary

,

video lectures

,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

past year papers

,

Previous Year Questions with Solutions

,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

Important questions

,

MCQs

,

Viva Questions

,

pdf

,

shortcuts and tricks

,

mock tests for examination

,

Exam

,

Extra Questions

,

Sample Paper

,

The Force Method of Analysis: Beams - 2 | Structural Analysis - Civil Engineering (CE)

,

study material

,

Objective type Questions

,

ppt

,

Free

,

Semester Notes

;