All questions of Independence and After for BPSC (Bihar) Exam

• 53 political parties were participating in the first general elections for the Lok Sabha seats. 
• These included the 14 national parties, according to the report by the Election Commission of India. Besides, there were independents. There were a total number of 1,874 candidates, including 533 independents.

Nationalists believed that the refugee problem could only be solved through a transfer of population and acquisition of certain territories from Pakistan rehabilitate the people who came into India.

Explanation:

The correct answer is option 'D', which means that all the given options are correct. Let's understand why.

1. Freedom of expression:
- The Constitution of India guarantees the fundamental right of freedom of expression to all its citizens.
- Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution states that all citizens have the right to freedom of speech and expression.
- This right allows citizens to express their opinions, ideas, and thoughts freely without fear of censorship or punishment.
- It is a crucial element of a democratic society as it enables citizens to participate in public discourse, criticize the government, and contribute to the development of the nation.

2. Right to inviolability of one's home:
- The Constitution of India recognizes the right to privacy and the inviolability of one's home.
- Article 21 of the Constitution guarantees the fundamental right to protection of life and personal liberty, which includes the right to privacy.
- This right ensures that individuals have control over their personal space and can live without unwarranted intrusion from the state or any other entity.
- It protects citizens from arbitrary searches, seizures, and surveillance, and establishes the importance of privacy as a fundamental human right.

3. Equality before the law:
- The Constitution of India ensures equality before the law and prohibits discrimination based on various grounds.
- Article 14 of the Constitution states that the state shall not deny any person equality before the law or equal protection of the laws.
- This principle ensures that all individuals, irrespective of their caste, religion, gender, or any other status, are treated equally by the law.
- It guarantees equal opportunities and protection to all citizens and promotes social justice and inclusivity.

In conclusion:
All the given options in the question - freedom of expression, right to inviolability of one's home, and equality before the law - are fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India. These rights are essential for the functioning of a democratic society and ensure that all citizens are treated with dignity and have the freedom to express themselves, protect their privacy, and receive equal treatment under the law. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D' - all of them.

The correct answer is option 'D', neither of them.

Explanation:
1. In the house of the people, 50% of the seats were reserved for the candidates belonging to the scheduled castes: This statement is incorrect. In the first general elections held in India in 1951-52, there were no reserved seats for candidates belonging to the scheduled castes. The reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes was introduced later through constitutional amendments.

2. Around 20% of the seats were reserved for the candidates belonging to the scheduled tribes: This statement is also incorrect. In the first general elections, there were no reserved seats for candidates belonging to the scheduled tribes. The reservation of seats for scheduled tribes was introduced later through constitutional amendments.

Reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes:
The reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes was introduced to ensure representation and political empowerment of these marginalized communities. The Constitution of India, through various amendments, provided for the reservation of seats in both the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the State Legislative Assemblies.

Reservation in the Lok Sabha:
Currently, the reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in the Lok Sabha is based on their proportion to the total population. As per the Constitution, 84 seats (out of 543) are reserved for scheduled castes and 47 seats (out of 543) are reserved for scheduled tribes. These reserved seats are distributed among different states and union territories based on their population.

Reservation in the State Legislative Assemblies:
Similar to the reservation in the Lok Sabha, the Constitution also provides for the reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in the State Legislative Assemblies. The number of reserved seats varies from state to state based on the proportion of the population of these communities.

Conclusion:
In summary, neither of the statements given in the question is correct. The reservation of seats for scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies was introduced through constitutional amendments after the first general elections.

Understanding the Boundary Commission
The Boundary Commission was a pivotal moment during the partition of India in 1947, tasked with demarcating the borders between India and Pakistan. Let's analyze the statements regarding the Commission.
Statement 1: The British government appointed the Boundary Commission under the chairmanship of Sir Radcliffe.
- This statement is correct.
- Sir Cyril Radcliffe was indeed appointed by the British government to chair the Boundary Commission.
- His role was critical in determining the borders based on religious demographics, land use, and other factors.
Statement 2: The Boundary Commission consisted of two Muslims and two non-Muslim judges in each case.
- This statement is correct.
- The Commission included members from various communities to ensure representation.
- However, the actual composition was predominantly British judges, with Radcliffe himself being the sole British member overseeing the entire process.
Conclusion
- Since both statements are accurate, the correct answer to the question is option 'D': Neither of them is incorrect.
- The Boundary Commission's decisions had lasting impacts on the subcontinent, leading to significant demographic and political changes.
In summary, both statements about the Boundary Commission are correct, confirming that option 'D' is the right choice.

Overview of the Linguistic Provinces Commission
The Linguistic Provinces Commission, appointed by the Constituent Assembly in 1948, played a significant role in the formation of states in India based on linguistic demographics.

Statement Analysis
1. **Opposition to Linguistic Reorganization**
- The commission indeed opposed the demands for the reorganization of provinces based on language. It held the view that such a division could lead to further fragmentation and regionalism, which might threaten national unity. Thus, this statement is correct.
2. **Inclusion of Linguistic Principle in the Constitution**
- Contrary to the first statement, the Constituent Assembly did not decide to include the linguistic principle in the Constitution due to the commission's recommendations. In fact, the linguistic principle was later implemented through the States Reorganisation Act of 1956, after considerable debate and discussion. Therefore, this statement is incorrect.

Conclusion
Given the analysis:
- Statement 1 is correct.
- Statement 2 is incorrect.
Thus, the correct answer is **option 'A': 1 Only**. The commission's reluctance towards linguistic reorganization played a pivotal role in shaping the early constitutional framework regarding state boundaries in India.

Explanation:

Statement 1: The Jain Commission report was indeed related to the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. The commission was set up to investigate the conspiracy behind the assassination and to identify those responsible for the tragic event.

Statement 2: The findings of the Jain Commission report did lead to the withdrawal of Congress support from I.K. Gujral's government. The Congress party decided to withdraw its support as the report implicated the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) party, which was a part of the ruling coalition led by Gujral.
Therefore, both statements are true as the Jain Commission report was linked to Rajiv Gandhi's assassination, and its findings resulted in the Congress party withdrawing its support from I.K. Gujral's government.

Ans is d is correct answer
neither of them

The first Council of Ministers of Independent India was as follows. 

BJP's Victory in 2014 General Elections:

- In the 2014 General Elections, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) secured a historic victory by winning 282 seats out of the 543 seats in the Lok Sabha.
- The BJP's victory marked the first time in over three decades that a single party had won a clear majority in the Indian parliament.
- This landslide victory allowed the BJP to form the government without the need for coalition partners.

Narendra Modi Elected as Prime Minister:

- Following the BJP's victory, Narendra Modi was elected as the Prime Minister of India.
- Modi's leadership and campaign focused on promises of economic development, good governance, and anti-corruption measures.
- His election as Prime Minister brought a significant shift in Indian politics, with a strong emphasis on economic reforms and infrastructure development.

Congress Party's Performance:

- In contrast to the BJP's success, the Indian National Congress, the main opposition party, faced a significant defeat in the 2014 elections.
- The Congress party only managed to win 44 seats, which was a drastic decline from its previous performance in the 2009 elections.
- The Congress party's poor showing in the elections led to a period of introspection and restructuring within the party to regain its political relevance.

Overall, the 2014 General Elections marked a significant turning point in Indian politics, with the BJP's victory under Narendra Modi's leadership reshaping the country's political landscape.

Explanation:

Lal Bahadur Shastri's Cabinet:
- Lal Bahadur Shastri served as the Prime Minister of India from 1964 to 1966.
- He had a talented team of ministers in his cabinet to assist him in governing the country.
- Some notable members of his cabinet included Indira Gandhi, Morarji Desai, L.K. Jha, and others.

Members of Lal Bahadur Shastri's Cabinet:
- Indira Gandhi: She was the Minister of Information and Broadcasting in Shastri's cabinet.
- Morarji Desai: He served as the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance in Shastri's cabinet.
- L.K. Jha: He was a prominent diplomat who served as the Ambassador of India to the United States and the United Nations. He also held various positions in the Government of India.
- I.G. Patel: He was not a part of Lal Bahadur Shastri's cabinet.
Therefore, the correct answer to the question is option 'D', I.G. Patel, as he was not a part of Lal Bahadur Shastri's cabinet.

Explanation:
Indira Gandhi's cautious approach towards economic liberalization during her second term can be attributed to her fear that multinational companies could undermine India's self-reliance. Let's break down the assertion and reason provided:

Indira Gandhi's Caution:
- Indira Gandhi, during her second term as Prime Minister of India, was indeed cautious about economic liberalization.
- She believed that a sudden opening up of the economy to multinational companies could have negative consequences for India's self-reliance.

Fear of Multinational Companies:
- Indira Gandhi's fear of multinational companies undermining India's self-reliance was a valid concern.
- She was wary of the potential influence and control that foreign companies could exert over India's economy, resources, and decision-making processes.

Correct Explanation:
- In this context, it is evident that the reason provided (fear of multinational companies undermining India's self-reliance) is the correct explanation for Indira Gandhi's cautious approach towards economic liberalization during her second term.
- Her concerns about maintaining India's independence, sovereignty, and self-reliance in the face of globalization and foreign influence shaped her policy decisions.
Therefore, option 'A' is the correct choice: Both the assertion (A) and reason (R) are true, and the reason (R) is the correct explanation of the assertion (A).

Explanation:

Statement 1:
- This statement is correct. Communists believed that a policy of class struggle and armed insurgency against the State-run by the Congress was necessary to divert the attention of the masses from the politics of communal hatred that was prevalent in the country post-partition.

Statement 2:
- This statement is correct. At the Third-Party Congress of the Communist Party of India (CPI), it was decided to withdraw the Telangana movement and instead focus on forging an inclusive front of peasants, workers, and the middle classes. This decision was aimed at building a broader coalition to address the socio-political issues of the time.

Statement 3:
- This statement is incorrect. Indian communists did participate in the general election of 1951-52. In fact, the CPI contested the elections and won a few seats in the legislative bodies. Despite facing challenges and repression, the Communists actively participated in the electoral process during this period.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' which includes statements 1 and 2 as correct.

Assertion (A): The 1977 general elections in India were a referendum on the Emergency imposed by Indira Gandhi.

Reason (R): The Janata Party campaigned heavily against the Emergency, focusing on civil liberties.

The correct answer is option 'A' - Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.

Explanation:
The 1977 general elections in India were indeed a referendum on the Emergency imposed by Indira Gandhi. The Emergency, which lasted from 1975 to 1977, was a period of authoritarian rule in India where civil liberties were curtailed, political opposition was suppressed, and media censorship was widespread.

The Janata Party, which was formed as a coalition of various opposition parties, campaigned heavily against the Emergency and focused on restoring civil liberties. Their campaign resonated with the public, who were disillusioned with the autocratic rule of Indira Gandhi and the Congress party. The Janata Party's opposition to the Emergency became a rallying point for the entire opposition and a symbol of the fight for democracy.

During the election campaign, the Janata Party highlighted the abuses of power during the Emergency, including forced sterilizations, arrests without trial, and press censorship. They promised to restore democratic rights and freedoms if elected to power. This resonated with the voters, who saw the elections as an opportunity to express their discontent with the Emergency and bring about a change in the political landscape of the country.

The election results were a clear indication of the public sentiment against the Emergency. The Janata Party and its allies won a landslide victory, winning 345 out of 542 seats in the Lok Sabha, the lower house of parliament. Indira Gandhi and the Congress party were reduced to a mere 154 seats.

The defeat of the Congress party in the 1977 elections marked the end of the Emergency era and a return to democracy in India. It was a significant moment in Indian political history and a clear verdict by the people against the authoritarian rule of Indira Gandhi.

In conclusion, the 1977 general elections in India were indeed a referendum on the Emergency imposed by Indira Gandhi, and the Janata Party's campaign against the Emergency and focus on civil liberties was a crucial factor in their victory.

Overview of Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale
Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was a prominent Sikh leader, whose influence marked a significant period in the history of Punjab during the 1980s. His actions and ideologies played a central role in the Sikh separatist movement.
Religious Leadership
- Bhindranwale was seen as a charismatic religious figure, leading the Damdami Taksal, a Sikh religious institution.
- He emphasized a return to the original teachings of Sikhism and sought to address the grievances of the Sikh community.
Sikh Militancy
- He became a symbol of Sikh militancy, advocating for the rights and autonomy of Sikhs in India.
- His rise coincided with growing discontent among Sikhs regarding perceived injustices and discrimination by the central government.
Operation Blue Star
- In June 1984, Bhindranwale and his followers took refuge in the Golden Temple complex in Amritsar.
- The Indian government launched Operation Blue Star to remove him and his armed supporters, leading to significant violence and casualties.
Legacy and Impact
- Bhindranwale's actions are often viewed as a catalyst for the Khalistan movement, which sought an independent Sikh state.
- His legacy remains controversial, with some viewing him as a martyr for Sikh rights, while others see him as a militant responsible for violence.
In summary, Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale was a Sikh militant and religious leader whose influence during the Punjab turmoil of the 1980s had lasting implications for Indian society and politics.

Introduction

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) was introduced by the Modi government in India with the aim of simplifying the existing tax structure and creating a unified tax system. The main purpose of implementing GST was to replace multiple central and state taxes with a single tax, bringing about a more efficient and transparent taxation system.

Explanation

1. Simplification of tax structure: One of the key objectives of introducing GST was to simplify the complex tax structure in India. Before the implementation of GST, there were multiple taxes levied by both the central and state governments, such as excise duty, service tax, value-added tax (VAT), etc. These taxes had different rates, exemptions, and procedures, leading to confusion and inefficiency. GST aimed to streamline this system by replacing all these taxes with a single tax, making compliance easier for businesses and taxpayers.

2. Creation of a unified market: Another important purpose of implementing GST was to create a unified market across the country. The previous tax structure resulted in fragmented markets due to barriers created by state borders. Different tax rates and procedures in each state made interstate trade cumbersome and increased the cost of doing business. GST aimed to eliminate these barriers by providing a uniform tax rate across the country and simplifying the compliance process. This resulted in the creation of a common market, promoting ease of doing business and fostering economic growth.

3. Transparency and accountability: GST brought about greater transparency and accountability in the tax system. The single tax rate and simplified procedures made it easier for businesses and taxpayers to understand and comply with the tax laws. The introduction of an online portal for registration, filing returns, and making payments made the entire process more transparent. This helped in reducing tax evasion and increasing tax compliance, leading to a broader tax base and improved revenue collection for the government.

4. Boost to the economy: By replacing multiple taxes with a single tax, GST eliminated the cascading effect of taxes, also known as the "tax on tax" system. This led to a reduction in the overall tax burden on businesses, making them more competitive. Lower tax costs and the ease of doing business resulting from GST implementation attracted investments and stimulated economic growth. GST also facilitated the free flow of goods and services across state borders, reducing logistics costs and improving overall efficiency in the supply chain.

Conclusion

The main purpose of introducing the Goods and Services Tax (GST) by the Modi government was to replace multiple central and state taxes with a single tax, simplifying the tax structure and creating a unified market. GST aimed to bring transparency, accountability, and efficiency to the tax system, boost the economy, and promote ease of doing business in India.

Withdrawal of Congress party support from United Front government:

Following are the key details related to the withdrawal of Congress party support from the United Front government in 1997:

- Congress party's decision: In 1997, the Congress party, led by Sonia Gandhi, withdrew its support from the United Front government. This move ultimately led to the fall of the government.

- Reasons for withdrawal: The Congress party cited various reasons for its decision to withdraw support. These reasons included disagreements over policy issues, lack of implementation of agreed-upon agendas, and concerns about the stability of the government.

- Impact on the United Front government: The withdrawal of support from the Congress party significantly weakened the United Front government. With the loss of a key ally, the government faced challenges in maintaining its majority in the Parliament.

- Subsequent events: Following the withdrawal of support, the United Front government was unable to survive a vote of confidence in the Parliament. As a result, the government collapsed, leading to political instability and the need for fresh elections.

- Significance: The withdrawal of support by the Congress party in 1997 had far-reaching implications for the political landscape of India. It highlighted the challenges of coalition governments and the importance of maintaining alliances to ensure the stability of the government.

In conclusion, the Congress party's decision to withdraw its support from the United Front government in 1997 was a significant development in Indian politics, leading to the fall of the government and subsequent political realignments.

Make in India.

Both statements are correct. Narendra Modi did become the Prime Minister of India on May 26, 2014, and his government did emphasize a development plan called Make in India.

Hyderabad
Hyderabad was the princely state that signed a Standstill Agreement with India in November 1947.

Standstill Agreement
- The Standstill Agreement was a pact between the princely states and the newly independent Dominion of India.
- It aimed to maintain the status quo in terms of communication, trade, and other essential services until a formal agreement could be reached.

Significance of the Agreement
- The Standstill Agreement was crucial in preventing disruptions in essential services in the princely states during the transition period.
- It allowed for a peaceful negotiation process between India and the princely states.

Hyderabad's Situation
- Hyderabad was a princely state located in the center of India, ruled by the Nizam.
- The Nizam was hesitant to join either India or Pakistan, leading to tensions and the eventual annexation of Hyderabad by India in 1948.

Outcome
- Despite the Standstill Agreement, Hyderabad's situation escalated into a military conflict known as the "Operation Polo" which resulted in the annexation of Hyderabad by India.
- The Standstill Agreement with Hyderabad ultimately did not prevent the integration of the princely state into the Indian Union.
In conclusion, the Standstill Agreement signed by Hyderabad in November 1947 was a significant event in the process of integrating the princely states into independent India.

The correct answer is option 'A' - 1 Only.

Explanation:

1. The Commonwealth of India Bill was rejected by the executive committee of the parliamentary labour party: This statement is correct. The Commonwealth of India Bill, also known as the Indian Statutory Commission, was introduced in 1930 by the British government to propose constitutional reforms in India. However, it faced strong opposition from various political groups, including the Indian National Congress. The executive committee of the parliamentary labour party, which consisted of members of the British Labour Party, rejected the bill due to concerns about its provisions and their impact on the rights and aspirations of the Indian people.

2. It had the support of extensive sections of Indian opinion: This statement is incorrect. The Commonwealth of India Bill did not have the support of extensive sections of Indian opinion. The bill was heavily criticized by various political parties and leaders in India, including the Indian National Congress. They argued that the proposed reforms were inadequate and did not address the demand for self-government and independence. The Congress called for the complete rejection of the bill and continued its struggle for full independence.

In conclusion, statement 1 is correct as the Commonwealth of India Bill was indeed rejected by the executive committee of the parliamentary labour party. However, statement 2 is incorrect as the bill did not have the support of extensive sections of Indian opinion.

Ans a ia correct

On the Palestine issue, the Congress lent support to the Palestinians. It expressed sympathy with the Jews but urged that the Palestinians not be displaced and that the issue be settled by direct dealing between the Jews and the Arabs without Western intervention. It also opposed the partition of Palestine.

Explanation:

First-Past-The-Post System:
- The first statement is correct. In the first general elections in India, the first-past-the-post system was used.
- Under this system, voters cast their vote for their preferred candidate in their constituency.
- The candidate who receives the highest number of votes, even if it is not an absolute majority, is declared the winner.

Majority Requirement:
- The second statement is incorrect. In the first-past-the-post system, the winning candidate does not necessarily need to have a majority of the votes.
- The candidate only needs to have more votes than any other candidate in the race to win the election.
- Therefore, the winning candidate could have won with a plurality of votes, not necessarily a majority.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A', which states that only the first statement is correct.

Explanation:
The correct answer is option 'B' - 2 Only. Let's examine each statement individually:

1. The Cripps Proposals of 1942 and the Cabinet Mission rejected by the Congress as unacceptable:
The Cripps Proposals were put forth by Sir Stafford Cripps, a member of the British Cabinet Mission, in March 1942. These proposals aimed to address the demand for Indian self-government and the involvement of Indians in the war effort during World War II. However, the proposals fell short of Congress' expectations as they did not provide for full independence or satisfy the demand for immediate transfer of power. Therefore, Congress rejected the proposals as unacceptable.

2. The Cabinet Mission recommended the forming of the Constituent Assembly and an interim government:
The Cabinet Mission, consisting of three British Cabinet members - Lord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, and A.V. Alexander - was sent to India in 1946 to find a solution to the Indian constitutional issue. The mission recommended the formation of a Constituent Assembly to draft a constitution for India and the establishment of an interim government. The Constituent Assembly would consist of representatives from various political parties and would be responsible for framing the constitution. The interim government would be formed during the transition period until the constitution was finalized.

Therefore, the correct statement is that the Cabinet Mission recommended the forming of the Constituent Assembly and an interim government (Statement 2). The first statement, on the other hand, is incorrect as the Congress rejected the Cripps Proposals of 1942 as unacceptable.

Key Points:
- The Cripps Proposals of 1942 were rejected by the Congress as unacceptable.
- The Cabinet Mission recommended the formation of the Constituent Assembly and an interim government.
- The Constituent Assembly was responsible for drafting the constitution for India.
- The interim government was established during the transition period until the constitution was finalized.
- The Cabinet Mission played a crucial role in the Indian constitutional process.

The correct answer is option 'B' - 3 Only. Let's break down the points made in Attlee's statement and explain why option 'B' is the correct choice:

1. Mountbatten would replace Linlithgow as the Viceroy:
This statement is not mentioned in Attlee's statement. There is no mention of the replacement of the Viceroy in his statement.

2. British powers vis-a-vis the princely states would lapse with the transfer of power, and this would be transferred to the successor government in British India:
This statement is not mentioned in Attlee's statement either. There is no explicit mention of the transfer of power from the British to the successor government in British India.

3. The British would relinquish power either to the Central Government or in some areas to the existing provincial governments:
This point is the main essence of Attlee's statement. He mentions that the British would relinquish power either to the Central Government or in some areas to the existing provincial governments. This indicates that the transfer of power would take place to either the central or provincial governments, depending on the circumstances.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'B' - 3 Only, as only the third point is mentioned in Attlee's statement. The other two points are not supported by his statement.

---

Incorrect Statement Explanation:




Plan Balkan was a proposal put forward by the British Cabinet Mission in 1946 as a way to solve the deadlock between the Indian National Congress and the All India Muslim League over the issue of Indian independence and the creation of Pakistan. Here is an explanation of the incorrect statement:




Statement 2: Initially it was supported by Congress, but later it was abandoned

- The statement is incorrect because Congress never supported Plan Balkan.
- In fact, Congress vehemently opposed the plan as it saw the proposal to divide Punjab and Bengal along communal lines as unacceptable.
- The Congress leadership believed in a united India and was not in favor of partitioning provinces based on religion.
- Thus, the statement that Congress initially supported Plan Balkan is not correct.

Therefore, the correct answer is option 'B' - 2 Only. The first statement about Plan Balkan's proposal to transfer power to separate provinces with the option to vote for partition in Punjab and Bengal is correct, but the second statement about Congress supporting the plan is not accurate.