Which of the following statements correct the linguistic province's C...
- Due to continuous demands, the Constituent Assembly, in June 1948, appointed the Linguistic Provinces Commission, headed by Justice S.K. Dhar, to enquire into the need of linguistic provinces.
- The Dhar Commission, however, opposed such a move in the interest of national integration. Consequently, the Constituent Assembly decided not to include the linguistic principle in the constitution.
Which of the following statements correct the linguistic province's C...
Overview of the Linguistic Provinces Commission
The Linguistic Provinces Commission, appointed by the Constituent Assembly in 1948, played a significant role in the formation of states in India based on linguistic demographics.
Statement Analysis
1. **Opposition to Linguistic Reorganization**
- The commission indeed opposed the demands for the reorganization of provinces based on language. It held the view that such a division could lead to further fragmentation and regionalism, which might threaten national unity. Thus, this statement is correct.
2. **Inclusion of Linguistic Principle in the Constitution**
- Contrary to the first statement, the Constituent Assembly did not decide to include the linguistic principle in the Constitution due to the commission's recommendations. In fact, the linguistic principle was later implemented through the States Reorganisation Act of 1956, after considerable debate and discussion. Therefore, this statement is incorrect.
Conclusion
Given the analysis:
- Statement 1 is correct.
- Statement 2 is incorrect.
Thus, the correct answer is **option 'A': 1 Only**. The commission's reluctance towards linguistic reorganization played a pivotal role in shaping the early constitutional framework regarding state boundaries in India.