All Exams >
Super TET >
Environment & Social Studies for Super TET >
All Questions
All questions of Amendment of the Constitution for Super TET Exam
A constitutional amendment bill must be passed in each house by a combination of which of these conditions?
1. Two-thirds of the total membership of each house
2. Majority of those present and voting in each house
3. Two-thirds of those present and voting in each house
4. Majority of the total membership of each house
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
- a)1 only
- b)None of the above
- c)4 only
- d)3 and 4
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
A constitutional amendment bill must be passed in each house by a combination of which of these conditions?
1. Two-thirds of the total membership of each house
2. Majority of those present and voting in each house
3. Two-thirds of those present and voting in each house
4. Majority of the total membership of each house
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a)
1 only
b)
None of the above
c)
4 only
d)
3 and 4
|
Sanjay Rana answered |
The correct conditions for passing a constitutional amendment bill in India are:
1. Two-thirds of those present and voting in each house (Option 3)
2. Majority of the total membership of each house (Option 4)
Explanation:
In India, the process of constitutional amendment is governed by Article 368 of the Indian Constitution. According to this article, an amendment bill must be passed in each house (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) by a majority of the total membership of that house and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
This means that both the conditions mentioned above must be met for the successful passage of a constitutional amendment bill in each house of the Indian Parliament.
1. Two-thirds of those present and voting in each house (Option 3)
2. Majority of the total membership of each house (Option 4)
Explanation:
In India, the process of constitutional amendment is governed by Article 368 of the Indian Constitution. According to this article, an amendment bill must be passed in each house (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) by a majority of the total membership of that house and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
This means that both the conditions mentioned above must be met for the successful passage of a constitutional amendment bill in each house of the Indian Parliament.
Article 368 provides for the procedure for amendment of the Constitution. About amendment, consider the following: 1. All amendments to the Constitution are initiated only in the Parliament. 2. The Constitution Commission is required to amend the Constitution. 3. After the passage of the amendment bill in the Parliament and, in some cases, in State legislatures, the referendum is required for ratification of the amendment. 4. Sovereignty of elected representatives is the basis of the amendment procedure.Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct? - a) 1 and 4 Only
- b) 1 and 2 Only
- c) 2 and 3 Only
- d) 1, 2 and 4 Only
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Article 368 provides for the procedure for amendment of the Constitution. About amendment, consider the following:
1. All amendments to the Constitution are initiated only in the Parliament.
2. The Constitution Commission is required to amend the Constitution.
3. After the passage of the amendment bill in the Parliament and, in some cases, in State legislatures, the referendum is required for ratification of the amendment.
4. Sovereignty of elected representatives is the basis of the amendment procedure.
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a)
1 and 4 Only
b)
1 and 2 Only
c)
2 and 3 Only
d)
1, 2 and 4 Only
|
Amit Kumar answered |
There are two methods of amending the Constitution and they apply to two different sets of articles of the Constitution:
1. A special majority can amend the two houses of the Parliament.
2. It requires a special majority of the Parliament and consent of half of the State legislatures. This method is more difficult.
Note:
- All amendments to the Constitution are initiated only in the Parliament. Besides the special majority in the Parliament no outside agency - like a constitution commission or a separate body - is required for amending the Constitution.
- Similarly, after the passage in the Parliament and, in some cases, in State legislatures, no referendum is required for ratification of the amendment.
- Only elected representatives of the people are empowered to consider and take final decisions on the question of amendments. Thus, the sovereignty of elected representatives (parliamentary sovereignty) is the basis of the amendment procedure.
Consider the following statements about the Constitutional amendment in India.
1. A private member of the Parliament cannot introduce a constitutional amendment bill
2. The prior permission of the President is required for the introduction of every constitutional amendment bill
3. Special days are reserved for introducing constitutional amendment bills
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
- a)1 and 2 only
- b)2 only
- c)1 and 3 only
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements about the Constitutional amendment in India.
1. A private member of the Parliament cannot introduce a constitutional amendment bill
2. The prior permission of the President is required for the introduction of every constitutional amendment bill
3. Special days are reserved for introducing constitutional amendment bills
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
None of the above
|
Ishita Kulkarni answered |
-
A private member of the Parliament cannot introduce a constitutional amendment bill: This statement is incorrect. A private member (a Member of Parliament who is not a minister) can introduce a constitutional amendment bill.
-
The prior permission of the President is required for the introduction of every constitutional amendment bill: This statement is incorrect. The prior permission of the President is not required for the introduction of a constitutional amendment bill.
-
Special days are reserved for introducing constitutional amendment bills: This statement is incorrect. There are no special days reserved specifically for introducing constitutional amendment bills; they can be introduced on any working day of the Parliament.
Given the above analysis, none of the statements are correct.
So, the correct answer is: None of the above
When a constitutional amendment bill is produced before the President, what are the options available to him? 1. Withhold the bill 2. Return the bill for reconsideration of the Parliament 3. End the bill Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct? - a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 2 only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) None of the above
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
When a constitutional amendment bill is produced before the President, what are the options available to him?
1. Withhold the bill
2. Return the bill for reconsideration of the Parliament
3. End the bill
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
None of the above
|
Mihir Chavan answered |
Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy: The First Unanimous President of India
Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy was the sixth President of India who served from 1977 to 1982. He was born on May 19, 1913, in Andhra Pradesh. He was a prominent leader of the Indian National Congress and played a vital role in the Indian Independence Movement.
Election as President
In 1977, after the emergency period, the Congress government led by Indira Gandhi was defeated in the general elections. In the presidential election held in July 1977, Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy was nominated as the presidential candidate by the opposition parties.
The Congress Party, which was in opposition at that time, also supported Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy's nomination. Due to the overwhelming support of all major political parties, he became the first President of India to be elected unanimously.
Contribution as President
As President of India, Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy made significant contributions to the country. He was known for his simplicity and down-to-earth nature. During his tenure, he emphasized the need for education, health, and rural development. He also advocated for the upliftment of marginalized communities and the promotion of national integration.
Conclusion
Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy was a visionary leader who played a significant role in shaping India's political landscape. His election as the first unanimously elected President of India showed that he was a leader who enjoyed the trust and support of all major political parties. His contributions to the country will always be remembered and cherished.
Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy was the sixth President of India who served from 1977 to 1982. He was born on May 19, 1913, in Andhra Pradesh. He was a prominent leader of the Indian National Congress and played a vital role in the Indian Independence Movement.
Election as President
In 1977, after the emergency period, the Congress government led by Indira Gandhi was defeated in the general elections. In the presidential election held in July 1977, Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy was nominated as the presidential candidate by the opposition parties.
The Congress Party, which was in opposition at that time, also supported Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy's nomination. Due to the overwhelming support of all major political parties, he became the first President of India to be elected unanimously.
Contribution as President
As President of India, Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy made significant contributions to the country. He was known for his simplicity and down-to-earth nature. During his tenure, he emphasized the need for education, health, and rural development. He also advocated for the upliftment of marginalized communities and the promotion of national integration.
Conclusion
Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy was a visionary leader who played a significant role in shaping India's political landscape. His election as the first unanimously elected President of India showed that he was a leader who enjoyed the trust and support of all major political parties. His contributions to the country will always be remembered and cherished.
If a bill seeks to amend the federal provisions of the Constitution - a) It must also be ratified by the legislatures of at least two-thirds of the states by a special majority
- b) It must be introduced in the Parliament with prior consent from the President
- c) It must receive the approval of a constitutional bench of Supreme Court under Article 143 before introduction in the Parliament
- d) None of the above is correct in this regard
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
If a bill seeks to amend the federal provisions of the Constitution
a)
It must also be ratified by the legislatures of at least two-thirds of the states by a special majority
b)
It must be introduced in the Parliament with prior consent from the President
c)
It must receive the approval of a constitutional bench of Supreme Court under Article 143 before introduction in the Parliament
d)
None of the above is correct in this regard
|
|
Sanvi Kapoor answered |
- It should be ratified by the legislatures of half of the states by a simple majority, that is, a majority of the members of the House present and voting. No special majority or two-thirds states are needed. So, A is incorrect.
- After duly passed by both the Houses of Parliament and ratified by the state legislatures, where necessary, the bill is presented to the President for assent. No prior consent is required.
- The power to initiate an amendment to the Constitution lies with the Parliament.
Several provisions in the Constitution can be amended by a simple majority of the two Houses of Parliament outside the scope of Article 368. These provisions include, inter alia 1. Citizenship clauses 2. Abolition or creation of legislative councils in states 3. Election of the President and its manner Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct? - a) 1 and 2 only
- b) 2 only
- c) 1 and 3 only
- d) None of the above
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Several provisions in the Constitution can be amended by a simple majority of the two Houses of Parliament outside the scope of Article 368. These provisions include, inter alia
1. Citizenship clauses
2. Abolition or creation of legislative councils in states
3. Election of the President and its manner
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a)
1 and 2 only
b)
2 only
c)
1 and 3 only
d)
None of the above
|
Ojasvi Mehta answered |
These matters include:
- Admission or establishment of new states.
- Formation of new states and alteration of areas, boundaries or names of existing states.
- Abolition or creation of legislative councils in states.
- Second Schedule - emoluments, allowances, privileges and so on of the President, the Governors, the Speakers, judges, etc.
- Quorum in Parliament.
- Salaries and allowances of the members of Parliament.
- Rules of procedure in Parliament.
- Privileges of the Parliament, its members and its committees.
- Use of English language in Parliament.
- Several puisne judges in the Supreme Court.
- Conferment of more jurisdictions on the Supreme Court.
- Use of official language.
- Citizenship - acquisition and termination.
- Elections to Parliament and state legislatures.
- Delimitation of constituencies.
- Union territories.
- Fifth Schedule - administration of scheduled areas and scheduled tribes.
- Sixth Schedule - administration of tribal areas.
Consider the following statements about the position of states concerning constitutional amendments:
1. The states can initiate a constitutional amendment bill in the USA, unlike in India.
2. The constitution does not provide a time limit for getting the required amendment cleared by the states in India.
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
- a)Only 1
- b) Both
- c)Only 2
- d)None
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements about the position of states concerning constitutional amendments:
1. The states can initiate a constitutional amendment bill in the USA, unlike in India.
2. The constitution does not provide a time limit for getting the required amendment cleared by the states in India.
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a)
Only 1
b)
Both
c)
Only 2
d)
None
|
Meera Kapoor answered |
The USA is a truly federal nation, gives power to its states to initiate amendments to the constitution. It is not the case in India, which is a quasi-federal nation.
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R):
Assertion (A): The reservation of 33% of seats for women in Parliament and state Legislature does not require constitutional Amendment.
Reason (R): Political parties contesting elections can allocate 33% of seats they contest to women candidates without any constitutional amendment.
Q. In the context of the above two statements, which one of the following is correct?
- a)Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
- b)Both A and R are true, but R is not a correct explanation of A.
- c)A is true, but R is false
- d)A is false, but R is true
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R):
Assertion (A): The reservation of 33% of seats for women in Parliament and state Legislature does not require constitutional Amendment.
Reason (R): Political parties contesting elections can allocate 33% of seats they contest to women candidates without any constitutional amendment.
Q. In the context of the above two statements, which one of the following is correct?
a)
Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A.
b)
Both A and R are true, but R is not a correct explanation of A.
c)
A is true, but R is false
d)
A is false, but R is true
|
|
Meera Singh answered |
- This is to encourage women to not underestimate them.
- As Many women politicians are in a very low minority in the respective parties and may feel marginalised.
- It is an 108th amendment bill, popularly called reservation for women and the major step taken to boost and encourage women's in the society and other areas.
Additional Information
- The Constitution (106th Amendment) Act, 2023, reserves one-third of all seats for women in Lok Sabha, State legislative assemblies, and the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi, including those reserved for SCs and STs.
Consider the following statements about the procedure to amend the Indian constitution: 1. A constitutional amendment bill requires the prior permission of the President. 2. It can only be introduced in the' Lok Sabha first as it is the house of the people from which the constitution derives its authority.Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct? - a) Only 1
- b) Only 2
- c) Both
- d) None
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements about the procedure to amend the Indian constitution:
1. A constitutional amendment bill requires the prior permission of the President.
2. It can only be introduced in the' Lok Sabha first as it is the house of the people from which the constitution derives its authority.
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a)
Only 1
b)
Only 2
c)
Both
d)
None
|
|
Ritika Choudhury answered |
The prior permission of the President is required only in the case of money bills and other bills like the one which seeks to divide a state. It can be introduced in any House.
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:
Amendment Process Similar to Legislation: Except for the special majority, the process of amending the Constitution is similar to passing regular bills in Parliament.Statement-II:
Balancing Flexibility and Rigidity: Despite some drawbacks, the amendment process strikes a balance between flexibility and rigidity. It's not so flexible that it can be changed easily by ruling parties, nor is it so rigid that it can't adapt to changing needs.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?- a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- b)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- c)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- d)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
Amendment Process Similar to Legislation: Except for the special majority, the process of amending the Constitution is similar to passing regular bills in Parliament.
Amendment Process Similar to Legislation: Except for the special majority, the process of amending the Constitution is similar to passing regular bills in Parliament.
Statement-II:
Balancing Flexibility and Rigidity: Despite some drawbacks, the amendment process strikes a balance between flexibility and rigidity. It's not so flexible that it can be changed easily by ruling parties, nor is it so rigid that it can't adapt to changing needs.
Balancing Flexibility and Rigidity: Despite some drawbacks, the amendment process strikes a balance between flexibility and rigidity. It's not so flexible that it can be changed easily by ruling parties, nor is it so rigid that it can't adapt to changing needs.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
a)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
b)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
c)
Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
d)
Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
|
Talent Triumphacademy answered |
Statement-I accurately compares the amendment process to passing regular bills in Parliament, emphasizing the similarity with the exception of the special majority requirement. Statement-II correctly points out the balance between flexibility and rigidity in the amendment process, ensuring it can adapt to changing needs while not being easily altered by ruling parties. While both statements are correct, they discuss different aspects of the amendment process without one explaining the other.
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:
No Time Frame for State Consent: The Constitution doesn't set a time limit for state legislatures to approve or reject an amendment. It also doesn't clarify if states can change their approval.Statement-II:
Facile Procedure for Amendments: The Constitution provides a relatively easy process for amending itself, allowing changes to meet evolving needs. This approach is different from some other countries like Canada, the USA, or Australia.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?- a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- b)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- c)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- d)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
No Time Frame for State Consent: The Constitution doesn't set a time limit for state legislatures to approve or reject an amendment. It also doesn't clarify if states can change their approval.
No Time Frame for State Consent: The Constitution doesn't set a time limit for state legislatures to approve or reject an amendment. It also doesn't clarify if states can change their approval.
Statement-II:
Facile Procedure for Amendments: The Constitution provides a relatively easy process for amending itself, allowing changes to meet evolving needs. This approach is different from some other countries like Canada, the USA, or Australia.
Facile Procedure for Amendments: The Constitution provides a relatively easy process for amending itself, allowing changes to meet evolving needs. This approach is different from some other countries like Canada, the USA, or Australia.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
a)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
b)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
c)
Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
d)
Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
|
Luminary Institute answered |
Statement-I correctly highlights the absence of a time frame for state consent in the Indian Constitution regarding amendments, indicating a crucial aspect of the amendment process. However, Statement-II is incorrect as it discusses the ease of amending the Constitution, which is not the focus of the first statement and can be misleading. While the Indian Constitution does provide a procedure for amendments, it is not necessarily facile in all respects, as indicated by the complexities and provisions discussed in the text.
Consider the following statements:Statement-I:
Sketchy Amendment Provisions: The details about the amendment procedure are not very clear, leaving room for legal interpretation. This might lead to matters being taken to the judiciary.Statement-II:
In simpler terms, while India's amendment process may have some complexities, it allows for necessary changes without being too rigid or too flexible. The aim is to balance stability with the ability to adapt to the nation's growth and changing circumstances.Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?- a)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
- b)Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
- c)Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
- d)Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
Statement-I:
Sketchy Amendment Provisions: The details about the amendment procedure are not very clear, leaving room for legal interpretation. This might lead to matters being taken to the judiciary.
Sketchy Amendment Provisions: The details about the amendment procedure are not very clear, leaving room for legal interpretation. This might lead to matters being taken to the judiciary.
Statement-II:
In simpler terms, while India's amendment process may have some complexities, it allows for necessary changes without being too rigid or too flexible. The aim is to balance stability with the ability to adapt to the nation's growth and changing circumstances.
In simpler terms, while India's amendment process may have some complexities, it allows for necessary changes without being too rigid or too flexible. The aim is to balance stability with the ability to adapt to the nation's growth and changing circumstances.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
a)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II explains Statement-I
b)
Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct, but Statement-II does not explain Statement-I
c)
Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect
d)
Statement-I is incorrect, but Statement-II is correct
|
|
Luminary Institute answered |
Statement-I correctly points out the lack of clarity in the details of the amendment procedure, highlighting the potential for legal interpretation and disputes that may necessitate judicial intervention. Statement-II further explains the complexities of the Indian amendment process, indicating that despite the ambiguities, it effectively balances stability with adaptability, ensuring necessary changes can be made without being excessively rigid or flexible.
What is the primary body responsible for initiating a Constitution amendment in India?- a)President
- b)Judiciary
- c)State Legislatures
- d)Parliament
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
What is the primary body responsible for initiating a Constitution amendment in India?
a)
President
b)
Judiciary
c)
State Legislatures
d)
Parliament
|
|
Aparna Joshi answered |
Parliament as the Primary Body for Initiating Constitution Amendment in India
The primary body responsible for initiating a Constitution amendment in India is the Parliament. Here's how the process works:
Initiation of Amendment
- A Constitution amendment can be initiated in either House of Parliament by introducing a Bill.
- The Bill can be introduced by a Minister or any member of Parliament.
Passage in Parliament
- The Bill must be passed by a special majority in both Houses of Parliament, i.e., a majority of the total membership of each House and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
- If the Bill is passed in both Houses, it is sent to the President for his/her assent.
President's Assent
- The President can either give his/her assent to the Bill or withhold it.
- If the President gives his/her assent, the Bill becomes a Constitution amendment and is included in the Constitution.
Importance of Parliament
- Parliament plays a crucial role in the amendment process as it represents the will of the people.
- Parliamentarians debate and deliberate on the proposed amendments, ensuring that they reflect the changing needs and aspirations of the nation.
In conclusion, the Parliament is the primary body responsible for initiating a Constitution amendment in India. Its role in the process highlights the importance of democratic deliberation and consensus-building in shaping the country's foundational document.
The primary body responsible for initiating a Constitution amendment in India is the Parliament. Here's how the process works:
Initiation of Amendment
- A Constitution amendment can be initiated in either House of Parliament by introducing a Bill.
- The Bill can be introduced by a Minister or any member of Parliament.
Passage in Parliament
- The Bill must be passed by a special majority in both Houses of Parliament, i.e., a majority of the total membership of each House and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting.
- If the Bill is passed in both Houses, it is sent to the President for his/her assent.
President's Assent
- The President can either give his/her assent to the Bill or withhold it.
- If the President gives his/her assent, the Bill becomes a Constitution amendment and is included in the Constitution.
Importance of Parliament
- Parliament plays a crucial role in the amendment process as it represents the will of the people.
- Parliamentarians debate and deliberate on the proposed amendments, ensuring that they reflect the changing needs and aspirations of the nation.
In conclusion, the Parliament is the primary body responsible for initiating a Constitution amendment in India. Its role in the process highlights the importance of democratic deliberation and consensus-building in shaping the country's foundational document.
Consider the following statements:1. Article 368 of the Indian Constitution deals with the procedure for amending the Constitution.2. Amendments related to the federal structure require a special majority in Parliament and ratification by at least half of the state legislatures.3. All amendments to the Constitution require the involvement of the state legislatures.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a)1 Only
- b)1 and 2 Only
- c)3 Only
- d)1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. Article 368 of the Indian Constitution deals with the procedure for amending the Constitution.
2. Amendments related to the federal structure require a special majority in Parliament and ratification by at least half of the state legislatures.
3. All amendments to the Constitution require the involvement of the state legislatures.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
1 and 2 Only
c)
3 Only
d)
1, 2 and 3
|
|
Talent Triumphacademy answered |
- Statement 1 is correct. Article 368 outlines the procedures for amending the Constitution.
- Statement 2 is correct. Amendments affecting the federal structure need a special majority in Parliament and ratification by at least half of the state legislatures.
- Statement 3 is incorrect. Not all amendments require the involvement of state legislatures; some can be passed by simple or special majority in Parliament alone.
Consider the following pairs regarding provisions that require a special majority in Parliament and consent of states for constitutional amendments:1. Directive Principles of State Policy - Special Majority in Parliament only2. Election of the President - Consent required from half of the state legislatures3. Creation or Abolition of Legislative Councils - Consent required from half of the state legislatures4. Parliament's Power to Amend the Constitution - Special Majority in Parliament and Consent of StatesHow many pairs given above are correctly matched?- a)Only one pair
- b)Only three pairs
- c)Only two pairs
- d)All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following pairs regarding provisions that require a special majority in Parliament and consent of states for constitutional amendments:
1. Directive Principles of State Policy - Special Majority in Parliament only
2. Election of the President - Consent required from half of the state legislatures
3. Creation or Abolition of Legislative Councils - Consent required from half of the state legislatures
4. Parliament's Power to Amend the Constitution - Special Majority in Parliament and Consent of States
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
a)
Only one pair
b)
Only three pairs
c)
Only two pairs
d)
All four pairs
|
|
Rajveer Chaudhary answered |
Analysis of the Pairs
To determine how many pairs regarding constitutional amendments are correctly matched, let's analyze each statement individually.
1. Directive Principles of State Policy - Special Majority in Parliament only
- Correctness: This is incorrect. Amendments relating to Directive Principles require a special majority in Parliament and, in certain cases, the consent of states as well.
2. Election of the President - Consent required from half of the state legislatures
- Correctness: This is correct. The election of the President involves amendments that require the consent of at least half of the state legislatures.
3. Creation or Abolition of Legislative Councils - Consent required from half of the state legislatures
- Correctness: This is also correct. The process of creating or abolishing a legislative council necessitates the consent of the majority of states.
4. Parliament's Power to Amend the Constitution - Special Majority in Parliament and Consent of States
- Correctness: This is incorrect. Not all amendments require the consent of states; only certain types do. A special majority in Parliament is essential, but state consent is not universally needed.
Summary of Correct Matches
- Pairs 2 and 3 are correctly matched.
- Pairs 1 and 4 are incorrect.
Conclusion
Thus, only two pairs are correctly matched. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'B' - only three pairs.
To determine how many pairs regarding constitutional amendments are correctly matched, let's analyze each statement individually.
1. Directive Principles of State Policy - Special Majority in Parliament only
- Correctness: This is incorrect. Amendments relating to Directive Principles require a special majority in Parliament and, in certain cases, the consent of states as well.
2. Election of the President - Consent required from half of the state legislatures
- Correctness: This is correct. The election of the President involves amendments that require the consent of at least half of the state legislatures.
3. Creation or Abolition of Legislative Councils - Consent required from half of the state legislatures
- Correctness: This is also correct. The process of creating or abolishing a legislative council necessitates the consent of the majority of states.
4. Parliament's Power to Amend the Constitution - Special Majority in Parliament and Consent of States
- Correctness: This is incorrect. Not all amendments require the consent of states; only certain types do. A special majority in Parliament is essential, but state consent is not universally needed.
Summary of Correct Matches
- Pairs 2 and 3 are correctly matched.
- Pairs 1 and 4 are incorrect.
Conclusion
Thus, only two pairs are correctly matched. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'B' - only three pairs.
Consider the following statements:1. The Constitution can be amended by a simple majority for changes related to the quorum in Parliament and the salaries of its members. 2. Amendments affecting the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the states require ratification by state legislatures.3. The abolition or creation of legislative councils in states requires only simple majority in Parliament.Which of the statements given above is/are correct?- a)1 Only
- b)1 and 2 Only
- c)3 Only
- d)1, 2 and 3
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements:
1. The Constitution can be amended by a simple majority for changes related to the quorum in Parliament and the salaries of its members.
2. Amendments affecting the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the states require ratification by state legislatures.
3. The abolition or creation of legislative councils in states requires only simple majority in Parliament.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
a)
1 Only
b)
1 and 2 Only
c)
3 Only
d)
1, 2 and 3
|
Lakshya Ias answered |
- The Constitution can be amended by a simple majority for changes related to the quorum in Parliament and the salaries of its members : Correct. Amendments related to quorum in Parliament and salaries of its members can indeed be made by a simple majority in both Houses of Parliament. These are not considered major constitutional amendments that require a special majority or ratification by states.
- Amendments affecting the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the states require ratification by state legislatures : Correct
Amendments affecting the distribution of powers between the Union and the states (such as changes in the federal structure) require ratification by the legislatures of at least half of the states as per Article 368. - The abolition or creation of legislative councils in states requires a simple majority in Parliament : Incorrect
According to Article 169, the abolition or creation of legislative councils in states requires a simple majority in Parliament, but it also requires a resolution by the state legislature. The process involves more than just a simple majority in Parliament; the state legislature must also pass a resolution to either create or abolish its legislative council.
Therefore,Correct Answer- Option B
Consider the following pairs regarding provisions that require a special majority in Parliament and consent of states for constitutional amendments:1. Distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States.- Consent required from more than half of the state legislatures2. Seventh Schedule Lists - Consent required from half of the state legislatures3. Representation of States in Parliament - Consent required from half of the state legislatures4. Fundamental Rights - Consent required from all state legislaturesHow many pairs given above are correctly matched?- a)Only one pair
- b)Only two pairs
- c)Only three pairs
- d)All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following pairs regarding provisions that require a special majority in Parliament and consent of states for constitutional amendments:
1. Distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States.- Consent required from more than half of the state legislatures
2. Seventh Schedule Lists - Consent required from half of the state legislatures
3. Representation of States in Parliament - Consent required from half of the state legislatures
4. Fundamental Rights - Consent required from all state legislatures
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
a)
Only one pair
b)
Only two pairs
c)
Only three pairs
d)
All four pairs
|
S.S Career Academy answered |
- Distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States.- Consent required from more than half of the state legislatures:Correct
Amendments that affect the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the states, such as changes in the Seventh Schedule (which deals with the Union List, State List, and Concurrent List), require ratification by the legislatures of at least half of the states. - Seventh Schedule Lists - Consent required from half of the state legislatures :Correct.
Amendments related to the Seventh Schedule (which divides powers and responsibilities between the Union and the states) require ratification by the legislatures of at least half of the states. - Representation of States in Parliament - Consent required from half of the state legislatures :Correct
Any amendment affecting the representation of states in Parliament (for example, changing the allocation of seats in the Rajya Sabha or Lok Sabha) requires ratification by the legislatures of at least half of the states. - Fundamental Rights - Consent required from all state legislatures :Incorrect
Amendments to Fundamental Rights do not require ratification by all state legislatures. Only amendments that affect the federal structure (e.g., the distribution of legislative powers or the representation of states in Parliament) require state ratification. Fundamental Rights can be amended by Parliament with the required special majority, but no state ratification is necessary for these amendments.
Therefore,Correct Answer- Option C
Consider the following pairs regarding provisions that require a special majority in Parliament and consent of states for constitutional amendments:1. Election of the President - Consent required from all states2. Executive Power - Consent required from half of the state legislatures3. Supreme Court and High Courts - Consent required from half of the state legislatures4. Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council - Consent required from all statesHow many pairs given above are correctly matched?- a)Only one pair
- b)Only two pairs
- c)Only three pairs
- d)All four pairs
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following pairs regarding provisions that require a special majority in Parliament and consent of states for constitutional amendments:
1. Election of the President - Consent required from all states
2. Executive Power - Consent required from half of the state legislatures
3. Supreme Court and High Courts - Consent required from half of the state legislatures
4. Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council - Consent required from all states
How many pairs given above are correctly matched?
a)
Only one pair
b)
Only two pairs
c)
Only three pairs
d)
All four pairs
|
|
Luminary Institute answered |
1. Incorrect. Consent required from half of the state legislatures, not all states.
2. Correct. Consent required from half of the state legislatures.
3. Correct. Consent required from half of the state legislatures.
4. Incorrect. Consent required from half of the state legislatures, not all states.
Consider the following statements. 1. The President cannot send back a constitutional amendment bill for reconsideration to the Parliament.2. Elected representatives alone have the power to amend the Constitution.3. The judiciary cannot initiate the process of Constitutional Amendment but can effectively change the Constitution by interpreting it differently.4. The Parliament can amend any section of the Constitution.Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct? - a)1, 2 and 4 only
- b)1, 2 and 3 only
- c)1 and 4 only
- d)All of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Consider the following statements.
1. The President cannot send back a constitutional amendment bill for reconsideration to the Parliament.
2. Elected representatives alone have the power to amend the Constitution.
3. The judiciary cannot initiate the process of Constitutional Amendment but can effectively change the Constitution by interpreting it differently.
4. The Parliament can amend any section of the Constitution.
Q. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
a)
1, 2 and 4 only
b)
1, 2 and 3 only
c)
1 and 4 only
d)
All of the above
|
Master Training Institute answered |
- Statement 1 is fully accurate, as the President has no role in sending a constitutional amendment bill back to Parliament.
- Statement 4 is also correct, with the caveat that certain provisions require additional processes (such as ratification by states) or are protected from amendment under the basic structure doctrine.
Correct answer: C: 1 and 4 only.
Chapter doubts & questions for Amendment of the Constitution - Environment & Social Studies for Super TET 2025 is part of Super TET exam preparation. The chapters have been prepared according to the Super TET exam syllabus. The Chapter doubts & questions, notes, tests & MCQs are made for Super TET 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, notes, meanings, examples, exercises, MCQs and online tests here.
Chapter doubts & questions of Amendment of the Constitution - Environment & Social Studies for Super TET in English & Hindi are available as part of Super TET exam.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Super TET Exam by signing up for free.
Environment & Social Studies for Super TET
233 videos|312 docs|72 tests
|
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup on EduRev and stay on top of your study goals
10M+ students crushing their study goals daily