Emergency and India's System

In times of emergency, India's system shifts from a unitary system to a quasi-federal system. This means that in an emergency situation, the central government gains more power and authority over the state governments while still maintaining a federal structure.

Unitary System

A unitary system is a form of government where power is concentrated at the national or central level. In a unitary system, the central government has the ultimate authority, and the state or local governments are subordinate to the central government. India is a federal system, which means that power is divided between the central government and the state governments.

Quasi-Federal System

In a quasi-federal system, the central government gains more power and authority during an emergency. This means that the central government has more control over the state governments and can take actions that would normally be the state's responsibility. However, the state governments still have some power and authority.

Examples of Emergency

The Indian Constitution provides for three types of emergency: national emergency, state emergency, and financial emergency. During a national emergency, the central government has the power to take actions that would normally be the state's responsibility, such as suspending fundamental rights, taking over the administration of the state, and passing laws that would normally require the state's approval.

Conclusion

In conclusion, during an emergency, India's system shifts from a unitary system to a quasi-federal system. This means that the central government gains more power and authority over the state governments while still maintaining a federal structure. This is necessary to ensure that the country can handle emergencies effectively and efficiently.