Introduction:
The politics of social division refers to the practice of political leaders creating divisions within society based on various social, cultural, religious, or ethnic identities. This strategy is often employed to gain support from specific communities and consolidate political power. The outcome of such politics depends on how political leaders raise the demands of these communities.

Key Factors:
Several key factors influence the outcome of politics of social division:

1. Leadership: The role of political leaders is crucial in determining the outcome of such politics. Their ability to effectively raise the demands of a community and address their concerns can either lead to unity or further divisions within society. Strong and inclusive leadership can bridge gaps and promote harmony, while divisive leadership can exacerbate tensions and perpetuate social divisions.

2. Rhetoric: The language and rhetoric used by political leaders play a significant role in shaping public opinion and mobilizing communities. If leaders use inflammatory or divisive language, it can fuel animosity and deepen social divisions. On the other hand, leaders who promote inclusive and empathetic rhetoric can foster unity and social cohesion.

3. Policy Implementation: The actual implementation of policies and measures that address the demands of specific communities is crucial in determining the outcome of politics of social division. If political leaders genuinely work towards fulfilling the demands of marginalized communities, it can lead to empowerment, social integration, and overall development. However, if promises are not fulfilled, it can breed disillusionment and further deepen divisions.

4. Media Influence: The role of media in shaping public perception and opinion cannot be underestimated. Media platforms can either amplify the voices of marginalized communities and promote understanding or perpetuate stereotypes and stoke tensions. The way media covers issues related to social divisions can significantly impact the outcome of politics in this context.

5. Public Engagement: The level of public engagement and participation in the political process also influences the outcome of politics of social division. If citizens actively participate in discussions, debates, and decision-making processes, it can lead to a more inclusive and representative political system. Conversely, if communities feel excluded or marginalized, it can lead to further polarization and division.

Conclusion:
The outcome of politics of social division is contingent upon various factors, including leadership, rhetoric, policy implementation, media influence, and public engagement. Political leaders who prioritize inclusive leadership, address community concerns, and foster unity have a higher likelihood of achieving positive outcomes. Conversely, divisive rhetoric, unfulfilled promises, and exclusionary policies can deepen social divisions and have negative consequences for society as a whole. It is imperative for political leaders to prioritize the well-being and unity of all communities to foster a more harmonious and inclusive society.