All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Which Articles of the Constitution invest ext... Start Learning for Free
Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?
  • a)
    Articles 32, 137 and 142
  • b)
    Articles 32, 136 and 142
  • c)
    Articles 136, 137 and 226
  • d)
    Articles 226, 137 and 142
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the S...
Articles of the Constitution that invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India is the highest judicial authority in the country. The Constitution of India grants the Supreme Court various powers and responsibilities to protect the rights of citizens and uphold the rule of law. Among the various Articles of the Constitution, the following three Articles invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court:

Article 32
This Article is considered as the heart and soul of the Indian Constitution. It provides individuals with the right to move to the Supreme Court for the enforcement of fundamental rights. This means that if an individual feels that his/her fundamental rights have been violated, he/she can approach the Supreme Court for relief. The Supreme Court can issue writs, including habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorari to protect the fundamental rights of citizens.

Article 136
This Article confers extraordinary power on the Supreme Court to grant special leave to appeal against any judgment or order passed by any court or tribunal in the country. This means that any aggrieved party can approach the Supreme Court for relief, even if the High Court has not granted permission to appeal. The Supreme Court has the discretion to grant or deny special leave to appeal.

Article 142
This Article empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order necessary to do complete justice in any case or matter pending before it. The Supreme Court can issue any order or direction to any person or authority, including the government, to ensure that justice is done. This Article gives the Supreme Court the power to pass orders that may not fall within the scope of its jurisdiction but are necessary to ensure complete justice.

Conclusion
In conclusion, Articles 32, 136 and 142 of the Constitution of India invest extraordinary powers in the Supreme Court. These powers have been granted to ensure that the Supreme Court can protect the fundamental rights of citizens, grant relief to aggrieved parties, and pass orders necessary to ensure complete justice.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the S...
Article 32 of Indian Constitution is the main piller to appeal in Supreme Court. If a party is not satisfied with the decision of any lower court or high court, it can move to supreme court to seek justice. The format to appeal in Supreme court is filing a case with the help of writs which are constitution remedies.

Article 136 is special leave to appeal by Supreme Court. Under this Article Supreme Court may grant leave to appeal against any judgement, decree, determination, order or sentence made by any court or tribunal under the territory of India, but it is not applicable to Armed Forces. This article holds prime place in the judiciary of India. This article is up to discretion of supreme court thus refusal to grant leave is also possible.

Article 142 deals with enforcement of any decree or order pending before it. It states that the Supreme Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction may pass such decree or make such order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it. By the help of this extraordinary power Supreme Court vests the advantage to interfere in the matters of states within the territory of India.

In this way it is clear that Articles 32, 136 and 142 are making the Judiciary more powerful by providing justice to the needy and to control the executive as well as command over state matters.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Article 142 allows the Supreme Court to pass any order necessary to do “complete justice” in any case. The Supreme Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction may pass such decree or make such order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it…” the Article states. The Supreme Court delivered a unanimous verdict Saturday in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case. The bench invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to hand over the disputed land to a trust to be formed by the central government in the next three months, under the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993.“In exercise of the powers vested in this Court under Article 142 of the Constitution, we direct that in the scheme to be framed by the central government, appropriate representation may be given in the trust or body, to the Nirmohi Akhara in such manner as the central government deems fit,” said the order given by the five-judge bench. “Subject to the provisions of any law made in this behalf by Parliament, the Supreme Court shall, as respects the whole of the territory of India, have all and every power to make any order for the purpose of securing the attendance of any person, the discovery or production of any documents, or the investigation or punishment of any contempt of itself,” the Article adds.Q. Which of these options strengthen the conclusion of Article 142?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part - III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.What is the correct meaning of the word ‘infringement’?

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part - III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights. However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.All of the following can be inferred from the passage except

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. All of the following can be inferred from the passage except

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?a)Articles 32, 137 and 142b)Articles 32, 136 and 142c)Articles 136, 137 and 226d)Articles 226, 137 and 142Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?a)Articles 32, 137 and 142b)Articles 32, 136 and 142c)Articles 136, 137 and 226d)Articles 226, 137 and 142Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?a)Articles 32, 137 and 142b)Articles 32, 136 and 142c)Articles 136, 137 and 226d)Articles 226, 137 and 142Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?a)Articles 32, 137 and 142b)Articles 32, 136 and 142c)Articles 136, 137 and 226d)Articles 226, 137 and 142Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?a)Articles 32, 137 and 142b)Articles 32, 136 and 142c)Articles 136, 137 and 226d)Articles 226, 137 and 142Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?a)Articles 32, 137 and 142b)Articles 32, 136 and 142c)Articles 136, 137 and 226d)Articles 226, 137 and 142Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?a)Articles 32, 137 and 142b)Articles 32, 136 and 142c)Articles 136, 137 and 226d)Articles 226, 137 and 142Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?a)Articles 32, 137 and 142b)Articles 32, 136 and 142c)Articles 136, 137 and 226d)Articles 226, 137 and 142Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?a)Articles 32, 137 and 142b)Articles 32, 136 and 142c)Articles 136, 137 and 226d)Articles 226, 137 and 142Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which Articles of the Constitution invest extraordinary power in the Supreme Court?a)Articles 32, 137 and 142b)Articles 32, 136 and 142c)Articles 136, 137 and 226d)Articles 226, 137 and 142Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup