Comparison between the account of Francois Barnier and earlier travellers in Through the eyes of travellers, Class 12, History


Francois Barnier was a Frenchman who travelled to India in the late 17th century. His account of India is different from the accounts of earlier travellers like Marco Polo, Ibn Battuta, and Nicolo Conti.


Barnier's account of India is different because he came from a different cultural background. He was a European who came to India during the colonial period. He was influenced by European ideas and values which were different from the ideas and values of the earlier travellers.


Unlike earlier travellers who were interested in exploring India's culture and traditions, Barnier's focus was on trade and commerce. He was interested in the economic potential of India and wrote extensively about the country's markets, resources, and industries.


The accounts of Barnier and the earlier travellers differ in their interest and focus. The earlier travellers were interested in exploring the culture and traditions of India, while Barnier was more interested in the country's economic potential. The earlier travellers wrote about the customs, traditions, and religions of India, while Barnier focused on the country's resources, markets, and industries.


In conclusion, Francois Barnier's account of India is different from the accounts of earlier travellers because he came from a different cultural background and had a different focus. His account is important because it provides valuable information about India's economic potential during the colonial period.

Other travelers wrote impressive and positive things about india like Ibn Battuta explained about the postal system of that time he also described about the "paan" and "coconut".But Francois mentioned weakness and negative things of the Indian society he compare all the things to Europe and considered mughal India inferior to Europe society..so his accounts are different from other travelers....
(I wish this is helpful for you)..