CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere w...
Start Learning for Free
Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.
Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.
Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.
- a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his house
- b)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate nature
- c)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rights
- d)None of the above
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or...
Actually we hv to just follow the principle. Now as Pawan is not interfering wid Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rights jst by sound of tabla classes (which is reasonable).
So ans is option C.
So ans is option C.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or...
Answer:
Principle:
Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.
Facts:
Jeevan and Pavan were neighbors in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabla class in a part of his house and the sound disturbed Jeevan, who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.
Reasoning:
The principle states that nobody should unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or any right associated with it. In this case, Jeevan claims that the sound from Pavan's tabla class is interfering with his use or enjoyment of his land or some right connected with it. To determine whether Pavan is liable, we need to consider the following points:
- Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land: The principle does not specify the exact nature of the interference with the use or enjoyment of land. However, it does state that the use or enjoyment should be normal and reasonable, taking into account the surrounding situations.
- Pavan's tabla class: Pavan has started a tabla class in his house, which is a normal activity and not inherently illegal or unreasonable.
- Interference with Jeevan's use or enjoyment: Jeevan claims that the sound from Pavan's tabla class is disturbing and he cannot tolerate continuous noise. However, it is important to assess whether the noise is normal and reasonable given the residential locality and the surrounding situations.
Conclusion:
Based on the given facts and the principle, Pavan is not liable for unlawfully interfering with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any right over it. The interference caused by the sound from Pavan's tabla class needs to be evaluated in terms of normality and reasonableness, taking into account the residential locality and surrounding situations. Therefore, option C is the correct answer.
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Similar CLAT Doubts
Top Courses for CLATView all
Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Principle Nobody shall unlawfully interfere with a person's use or enjoyment of land or some right over, or in connection with it. The use or enjoyment, envisaged herein, should be normal and reasonable taking into account surrounding situations.Facts Jeevan and Pavan were neighbours in a residential locality. Pavan started a tabia class in a part of his house and the sound, disturbed Jeevan who could not put up with any kind of continuous noise. He filed a suit against Pavan.a)Pavan is liable, because he should not have started tabala class in his houseb)Pavan is liable, because as neighbours, he should have realised Jeean's delicate naturec)Pavan is not liable, because the sound does not interfere with Jeevan's use or enjoyment of land or any of his rightsd)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for CLAT exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup