GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Opponents of laws that require automobile dri...
Start Learning for Free
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?
- a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.
- b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.
- c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.
- d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.
- e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to we...
The principle that people are entitled to risk injury provided they do not thereby harm others fails to justify the individual's right to decide not to wear seat belts if it can be shown, as B shows, that that decision does harm others. Therefore, B is the best answer. A suggests that the law may be irrelevant in some cases, but it does not address the issue of the law's legitimacy. C cites a requirement analogous to the one at issue, but its existence alone does not bear on the legitimacy of the one at issue. The argument implicitly concedes that individuals take risks by not wearing seat belts; therefore, D and E, which simply confirm this concession, do not weaken the conclusion.
Most Upvoted Answer
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to we...
Explanation:
Impact of Automobile Insurance Rates:
- The argument is based on the premise that individuals should have the freedom to take risks without harming others.
- However, when individuals choose not to wear seat belts, they are more likely to sustain severe injuries or die in automobile accidents.
- This leads to increased costs for automobile insurance companies, which are then passed on to all automobile owners in the form of higher insurance rates.
- Therefore, the decision not to wear a seat belt can indirectly harm others by contributing to higher insurance costs.
This weakens the argument that individuals should have the sole decision-making power regarding seat belt usage, as it demonstrates a broader societal impact beyond individual choice.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to we...
Who the answer is when a driver of a vehicle jumps in the driver seat and has passengers I suggest put them In a seat belt no matter what because the driver is the responsible one obligations to there life's of the road of cars and trucks and such being held responsible for there life's is on them just like when they pump in the gasoline in there car or eg cars there got life's there responsible for only after they get out of car truck ect so it ways heavily yes but I know insurance on cloth idk about that one
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as the people do not harm other as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup