GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Opponents of laws that require automobile dri...
Start Learning for Free
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?
- a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.
- b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.
- c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.
- d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.
- e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to we...
The argument's conclusion is that it should be each person's decision whether or not to wear a seat belt, based on the premise that people have the right to take risks as long as they do not harm others.
Let's evaluate each answer choice:
(A) Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.
- This answer choice provides information about a feature in new cars but does not directly address the conclusion. It does not weaken the argument.
(B) Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.
This answer choice introduces the concept of increased insurance rates due to injuries or deaths of individuals not wearing seat belts. This information directly weakens the argument because it shows that not wearing seat belts can have financial consequences for others, thus harming them indirectly.
(C) Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.
- This answer choice introduces a comparison between seat belt requirements in airplanes and cars. However, it does not directly address the conclusion about individual rights and does not provide any information that weakens the argument.
(D) The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.
- This answer choice directly weakens the argument by providing evidence that states with mandatory seat belt laws have lower fatality rates. This suggests that wearing seat belts can significantly reduce the risk of fatalities and contradicts the argument's premise that individuals should have the right to take risks without causing harm to others.
(E) In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than passengers who do wear seat belts.
- This answer choice provides information about the likelihood of injury in automobile accidents based on seat belt usage. Although it suggests a correlation between seat belt usage and reduced injuries, it does not directly address the conclusion about individual rights and does not weaken the argument.
After evaluating each answer choice, it becomes clear that option (B) weakens the conclusion most effectively. It demonstrates that not wearing seat belts can lead to increased financial burdens on others through higher insurance rates. Therefore, (B) is the correct answer.
Community Answer
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to we...
Explanation:
Impact on Automobile Insurance Rates:
- Option B weakens the opponents' argument by pointing out that the decision not to wear a seat belt can have indirect consequences on others.
- When people choose not to wear seat belts, they are at a higher risk of injury or death in an accident.
- This leads to increased insurance claims and payouts, resulting in higher insurance rates for all automobile owners.
- Therefore, the argument that seat belt usage is solely a personal decision is weakened by the fact that it can have a broader impact on society through increased insurance costs.
Impact on Automobile Insurance Rates:
- Option B weakens the opponents' argument by pointing out that the decision not to wear a seat belt can have indirect consequences on others.
- When people choose not to wear seat belts, they are at a higher risk of injury or death in an accident.
- This leads to increased insurance claims and payouts, resulting in higher insurance rates for all automobile owners.
- Therefore, the argument that seat belt usage is solely a personal decision is weakened by the fact that it can have a broader impact on society through increased insurance costs.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Opponents of laws that require automobile drivers and passengers to wear seat belts argue that in a free society people have the right to take risks as long as people do not harm others as a result of taking the risks. As a result, they conclude that it should be each person’s decision whether or not to wear a seat belt.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion drawn above?a)Many new cars are built with seat belts that automatically fasten when someone sits in the front seat.b)Automobile insurance rates for all automobile owners are higher because of the need to pay for the increased injuries or deaths of people not wearing seat belts.c)Passengers in airplanes are required to wear seat belts during takeoffs and landings.d)The rate of automobile fatalities in states that do not have mandatory seat belt laws is greater than the rate of fatalities in states that do have such laws.e)In automobile accidents, a greater number of passengers who do not wear seat belts are injured than are passengers who do wear seat belts.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup