GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > In the United States, injuries to passengers ...
Start Learning for Free
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
- a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
- b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
- c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
- d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
- e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile ac...
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
Incorrect. This option weakens the argument by presenting an alternate explanation for the difference in the severity of the injuries. If Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts, naturally they are expected to have less severe injuries in accidents. Does the ‘kind of seat belt’ have a role to play in the difference in the severity of the injuries? We are not sure now. Thus, the conclusion suggesting changes in the standards for safety belt design comes into question.
Incorrect. This option weakens the argument by presenting an alternate explanation for the difference in the severity of the injuries. If Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts, naturally they are expected to have less severe injuries in accidents. Does the ‘kind of seat belt’ have a role to play in the difference in the severity of the injuries? We are not sure now. Thus, the conclusion suggesting changes in the standards for safety belt design comes into question.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
Incorrect. This option weakens the argument by presenting an alternate explanation for the difference in the severity of the injuries. If European drivers and not US drivers are trained in the way mentioned, naturally Europeans are expected to have less severe injuries in accidents. This casts doubt on whether safety seat belts have any role to play in the difference in the severity of the injuries.
Incorrect. This option weakens the argument by presenting an alternate explanation for the difference in the severity of the injuries. If European drivers and not US drivers are trained in the way mentioned, naturally Europeans are expected to have less severe injuries in accidents. This casts doubt on whether safety seat belts have any role to play in the difference in the severity of the injuries.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
Incorrect. This option weakens the argument by presenting an alternate explanation for the difference in the severity of the injuries. If European cars are sturdier than the US cars, naturally Europeans are expected to have less severe injuries in accidents since the cars will be able to protect the passengers better. This option too casts doubt on whether safety seat belts have any role to play in the difference in the severity of the injuries.
Incorrect. This option weakens the argument by presenting an alternate explanation for the difference in the severity of the injuries. If European cars are sturdier than the US cars, naturally Europeans are expected to have less severe injuries in accidents since the cars will be able to protect the passengers better. This option too casts doubt on whether safety seat belts have any role to play in the difference in the severity of the injuries.
The first three options highlight a very common way of weakening such an argument – presenting an alternate cause that probably leads to the effect.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
Correct. This option has no impact on the argument. The option suggests that on average, automobile passengers in the US get involved in more accidents than do passengers in Europe. However, regardless of the number of accidents passengers get involved in, the difference in the ‘severity of the injuries’ still stands. And from the argument, it does seem that difference in the kinds of safety belts has a role to play here. Thus, the argument stands as is.
Correct. This option has no impact on the argument. The option suggests that on average, automobile passengers in the US get involved in more accidents than do passengers in Europe. However, regardless of the number of accidents passengers get involved in, the difference in the ‘severity of the injuries’ still stands. And from the argument, it does seem that difference in the kinds of safety belts has a role to play here. Thus, the argument stands as is.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
Incorrect. This option weakens the argument by presenting a situation in which the suggestion presented in the conclusion hasn’t worked. If the states that have started using European safety belts have not experienced any benefit from the shift, we become doubtful whether any changes in the safety seat belt design will help the US.
Incorrect. This option weakens the argument by presenting a situation in which the suggestion presented in the conclusion hasn’t worked. If the states that have started using European safety belts have not experienced any benefit from the shift, we become doubtful whether any changes in the safety seat belt design will help the US.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:a)Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.b)Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.c)Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.d)Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.e)States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup