The Civil Disobedience Movement was different from the Non-Cooperation Movement :

Non-Cooperation Movement :
(a) The people were asked not to cooperate with the government
(b) Foreign goods were boycotted.
(c) Liquor shops were picketed.
(d) Foreign clothes were burnt in heape.
(e) In many places merchants and traders refused to trade on foreign goods or finance foreign traders.
(f) Students left the government owned schools and college.
(g) Lawyers gave up legal practices.

Civil Disobedience Movement :
(a) People were asked to break colonial laws.
(b) The countrymen broke the salt law.
(c) Peasants refused to pay revenue and chaukidari tax.
(d) Village officials resigned from their jobs.
(e) Forest people violated forest rules and laws.

The Civil Disobedience Movement vs Non-Cooperation Movement

The Indian independence movement witnessed various methods of protests and resistance against British colonial rule. Two significant movements during this period were the Civil Disobedience Movement and the Non-Cooperation Movement. Although both aimed to challenge British authority, they differed in their objectives, strategies, and outcomes.

Non-Cooperation Movement:

1. Objective: The Non-Cooperation Movement, led by Mahatma Gandhi in 1920-1922, aimed to withdraw the cooperation of Indians from British institutions, including educational institutions, law courts, and government services.

2. Methods: The movement advocated non-violent protests, such as strikes, boycotts, and peaceful demonstrations. Indians were encouraged to refuse to pay taxes and boycott British goods.

3. Key Events: The movement gained momentum with the boycott of the Simon Commission, which was seen as a symbol of British oppression. The movement also witnessed the Chauri Chaura incident, where a violent clash between protestors and police led to Gandhi calling off the movement.

4. Impact: The Non-Cooperation Movement brought millions of Indians together in a united struggle against British rule. It highlighted the power of non-violence and civil disobedience as effective tools for resistance. However, the movement faced challenges in maintaining discipline and was prematurely called off after the Chauri Chaura incident.

Civil Disobedience Movement:

1. Objective: The Civil Disobedience Movement, launched by Mahatma Gandhi in 1930, aimed to challenge specific British laws and policies, particularly the salt tax.

2. Methods: The movement involved acts of civil disobedience, such as the Salt March, where Gandhi and his followers walked over 240 miles to produce salt from seawater in defiance of the British monopoly. Indians also boycotted British goods and refused to pay taxes.

3. Key Events: The Salt March became a defining moment of the movement, capturing international attention and inspiring millions of Indians to join the resistance. Numerous acts of civil disobedience, including the making and selling of illegal salt, disrupted British administration across the country.

4. Impact: The Civil Disobedience Movement further mobilized Indian masses and demonstrated their determination to challenge British authority. It led to the Round Table Conferences in London, where Indian leaders demanded greater self-rule. However, the movement faced significant repression from the British authorities, resulting in mass arrests and violence.

Differences:

1. Objective: The Non-Cooperation Movement aimed to withdraw cooperation from British institutions, while the Civil Disobedience Movement targeted specific British laws and policies.

2. Methods: The Non-Cooperation Movement focused on boycotts and strikes, while the Civil Disobedience Movement emphasized acts of civil disobedience and non-violent protests.

3. Key Events: The Non-Cooperation Movement boycotted the Simon Commission, while the Civil Disobedience Movement gained prominence through the Salt March.

4. Impact: The Non-Cooperation Movement highlighted the power of non-violence and unity, while the Civil Disobedience Movement further mobilized Indian masses and led to international attention