Question Description
The two construction periods at Aztec, New Mexico, as indicated by the modern tree-ring dating, are corroborated nicely by other evidence found by archaeologist Earl H. Morris in the 1920’s that Aztec actually was built by one group of people, abandoned, and then reoccupied at a later date by a slightly different group of people. Throughout all the rooms he dug during his early 20th century excavations, he found sterile layers of windblown sand and ruined debris from falling walls and ceilings. In this debris and under the sand, he found Chaco-like pottery and artifacts. In addition, there were surprisingly few burial sites. Even today, archeologists have located few Chaco-type burials in Chaco Canyon itself. Whatever the burial customs of the Chaco people may have been, they have eluded archeologists for many decades. The absence of burials of this period at Aztec is a clue that probably a group of Chaco-like people, bearing the distinctive Chaco culture, may actually have moved into the Aztec area.Granting that the local sandstone was not quite as easily worked as that at Chaco, the large-size rooms, the high ceilings, the banded-veneer masonry walls, the large doorways, and other techniques used were very similar to the architectural techniques of the Chaco area. Overlying the Chaco debris and sterile sand layers, Morris found pottery, household utensils, and burials characteristic of the classic Mesa Verde Period—a period which occurred later than the great Chaco Period. In addition, there were obvious architectural signs of rebuilding and remodeling within the pueblo. Large Chaco-type rooms had been made smaller by wattle-and-daub partition walls, while doorways had been shortened and narrowed more like the ones at Mesa Verde. Thus there were two definite periods of occupation at Aztec, one by a Chaco-like people and one by a Mesa Verde-type people.The author is primarily concerned witha)Refuting a misconception with specific supportb)Describing the findings of an archaeologist with whom the author partially agreesc)Stating a theory and providing support for itd)Reframing the timeline for the habitation of a historical sitee)Arguing for the existence of different culturesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about The two construction periods at Aztec, New Mexico, as indicated by the modern tree-ring dating, are corroborated nicely by other evidence found by archaeologist Earl H. Morris in the 1920’s that Aztec actually was built by one group of people, abandoned, and then reoccupied at a later date by a slightly different group of people. Throughout all the rooms he dug during his early 20th century excavations, he found sterile layers of windblown sand and ruined debris from falling walls and ceilings. In this debris and under the sand, he found Chaco-like pottery and artifacts. In addition, there were surprisingly few burial sites. Even today, archeologists have located few Chaco-type burials in Chaco Canyon itself. Whatever the burial customs of the Chaco people may have been, they have eluded archeologists for many decades. The absence of burials of this period at Aztec is a clue that probably a group of Chaco-like people, bearing the distinctive Chaco culture, may actually have moved into the Aztec area.Granting that the local sandstone was not quite as easily worked as that at Chaco, the large-size rooms, the high ceilings, the banded-veneer masonry walls, the large doorways, and other techniques used were very similar to the architectural techniques of the Chaco area. Overlying the Chaco debris and sterile sand layers, Morris found pottery, household utensils, and burials characteristic of the classic Mesa Verde Period—a period which occurred later than the great Chaco Period. In addition, there were obvious architectural signs of rebuilding and remodeling within the pueblo. Large Chaco-type rooms had been made smaller by wattle-and-daub partition walls, while doorways had been shortened and narrowed more like the ones at Mesa Verde. Thus there were two definite periods of occupation at Aztec, one by a Chaco-like people and one by a Mesa Verde-type people.The author is primarily concerned witha)Refuting a misconception with specific supportb)Describing the findings of an archaeologist with whom the author partially agreesc)Stating a theory and providing support for itd)Reframing the timeline for the habitation of a historical sitee)Arguing for the existence of different culturesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The two construction periods at Aztec, New Mexico, as indicated by the modern tree-ring dating, are corroborated nicely by other evidence found by archaeologist Earl H. Morris in the 1920’s that Aztec actually was built by one group of people, abandoned, and then reoccupied at a later date by a slightly different group of people. Throughout all the rooms he dug during his early 20th century excavations, he found sterile layers of windblown sand and ruined debris from falling walls and ceilings. In this debris and under the sand, he found Chaco-like pottery and artifacts. In addition, there were surprisingly few burial sites. Even today, archeologists have located few Chaco-type burials in Chaco Canyon itself. Whatever the burial customs of the Chaco people may have been, they have eluded archeologists for many decades. The absence of burials of this period at Aztec is a clue that probably a group of Chaco-like people, bearing the distinctive Chaco culture, may actually have moved into the Aztec area.Granting that the local sandstone was not quite as easily worked as that at Chaco, the large-size rooms, the high ceilings, the banded-veneer masonry walls, the large doorways, and other techniques used were very similar to the architectural techniques of the Chaco area. Overlying the Chaco debris and sterile sand layers, Morris found pottery, household utensils, and burials characteristic of the classic Mesa Verde Period—a period which occurred later than the great Chaco Period. In addition, there were obvious architectural signs of rebuilding and remodeling within the pueblo. Large Chaco-type rooms had been made smaller by wattle-and-daub partition walls, while doorways had been shortened and narrowed more like the ones at Mesa Verde. Thus there were two definite periods of occupation at Aztec, one by a Chaco-like people and one by a Mesa Verde-type people.The author is primarily concerned witha)Refuting a misconception with specific supportb)Describing the findings of an archaeologist with whom the author partially agreesc)Stating a theory and providing support for itd)Reframing the timeline for the habitation of a historical sitee)Arguing for the existence of different culturesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The two construction periods at Aztec, New Mexico, as indicated by the modern tree-ring dating, are corroborated nicely by other evidence found by archaeologist Earl H. Morris in the 1920’s that Aztec actually was built by one group of people, abandoned, and then reoccupied at a later date by a slightly different group of people. Throughout all the rooms he dug during his early 20th century excavations, he found sterile layers of windblown sand and ruined debris from falling walls and ceilings. In this debris and under the sand, he found Chaco-like pottery and artifacts. In addition, there were surprisingly few burial sites. Even today, archeologists have located few Chaco-type burials in Chaco Canyon itself. Whatever the burial customs of the Chaco people may have been, they have eluded archeologists for many decades. The absence of burials of this period at Aztec is a clue that probably a group of Chaco-like people, bearing the distinctive Chaco culture, may actually have moved into the Aztec area.Granting that the local sandstone was not quite as easily worked as that at Chaco, the large-size rooms, the high ceilings, the banded-veneer masonry walls, the large doorways, and other techniques used were very similar to the architectural techniques of the Chaco area. Overlying the Chaco debris and sterile sand layers, Morris found pottery, household utensils, and burials characteristic of the classic Mesa Verde Period—a period which occurred later than the great Chaco Period. In addition, there were obvious architectural signs of rebuilding and remodeling within the pueblo. Large Chaco-type rooms had been made smaller by wattle-and-daub partition walls, while doorways had been shortened and narrowed more like the ones at Mesa Verde. Thus there were two definite periods of occupation at Aztec, one by a Chaco-like people and one by a Mesa Verde-type people.The author is primarily concerned witha)Refuting a misconception with specific supportb)Describing the findings of an archaeologist with whom the author partially agreesc)Stating a theory and providing support for itd)Reframing the timeline for the habitation of a historical sitee)Arguing for the existence of different culturesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The two construction periods at Aztec, New Mexico, as indicated by the modern tree-ring dating, are corroborated nicely by other evidence found by archaeologist Earl H. Morris in the 1920’s that Aztec actually was built by one group of people, abandoned, and then reoccupied at a later date by a slightly different group of people. Throughout all the rooms he dug during his early 20th century excavations, he found sterile layers of windblown sand and ruined debris from falling walls and ceilings. In this debris and under the sand, he found Chaco-like pottery and artifacts. In addition, there were surprisingly few burial sites. Even today, archeologists have located few Chaco-type burials in Chaco Canyon itself. Whatever the burial customs of the Chaco people may have been, they have eluded archeologists for many decades. The absence of burials of this period at Aztec is a clue that probably a group of Chaco-like people, bearing the distinctive Chaco culture, may actually have moved into the Aztec area.Granting that the local sandstone was not quite as easily worked as that at Chaco, the large-size rooms, the high ceilings, the banded-veneer masonry walls, the large doorways, and other techniques used were very similar to the architectural techniques of the Chaco area. Overlying the Chaco debris and sterile sand layers, Morris found pottery, household utensils, and burials characteristic of the classic Mesa Verde Period—a period which occurred later than the great Chaco Period. In addition, there were obvious architectural signs of rebuilding and remodeling within the pueblo. Large Chaco-type rooms had been made smaller by wattle-and-daub partition walls, while doorways had been shortened and narrowed more like the ones at Mesa Verde. Thus there were two definite periods of occupation at Aztec, one by a Chaco-like people and one by a Mesa Verde-type people.The author is primarily concerned witha)Refuting a misconception with specific supportb)Describing the findings of an archaeologist with whom the author partially agreesc)Stating a theory and providing support for itd)Reframing the timeline for the habitation of a historical sitee)Arguing for the existence of different culturesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The two construction periods at Aztec, New Mexico, as indicated by the modern tree-ring dating, are corroborated nicely by other evidence found by archaeologist Earl H. Morris in the 1920’s that Aztec actually was built by one group of people, abandoned, and then reoccupied at a later date by a slightly different group of people. Throughout all the rooms he dug during his early 20th century excavations, he found sterile layers of windblown sand and ruined debris from falling walls and ceilings. In this debris and under the sand, he found Chaco-like pottery and artifacts. In addition, there were surprisingly few burial sites. Even today, archeologists have located few Chaco-type burials in Chaco Canyon itself. Whatever the burial customs of the Chaco people may have been, they have eluded archeologists for many decades. The absence of burials of this period at Aztec is a clue that probably a group of Chaco-like people, bearing the distinctive Chaco culture, may actually have moved into the Aztec area.Granting that the local sandstone was not quite as easily worked as that at Chaco, the large-size rooms, the high ceilings, the banded-veneer masonry walls, the large doorways, and other techniques used were very similar to the architectural techniques of the Chaco area. Overlying the Chaco debris and sterile sand layers, Morris found pottery, household utensils, and burials characteristic of the classic Mesa Verde Period—a period which occurred later than the great Chaco Period. In addition, there were obvious architectural signs of rebuilding and remodeling within the pueblo. Large Chaco-type rooms had been made smaller by wattle-and-daub partition walls, while doorways had been shortened and narrowed more like the ones at Mesa Verde. Thus there were two definite periods of occupation at Aztec, one by a Chaco-like people and one by a Mesa Verde-type people.The author is primarily concerned witha)Refuting a misconception with specific supportb)Describing the findings of an archaeologist with whom the author partially agreesc)Stating a theory and providing support for itd)Reframing the timeline for the habitation of a historical sitee)Arguing for the existence of different culturesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The two construction periods at Aztec, New Mexico, as indicated by the modern tree-ring dating, are corroborated nicely by other evidence found by archaeologist Earl H. Morris in the 1920’s that Aztec actually was built by one group of people, abandoned, and then reoccupied at a later date by a slightly different group of people. Throughout all the rooms he dug during his early 20th century excavations, he found sterile layers of windblown sand and ruined debris from falling walls and ceilings. In this debris and under the sand, he found Chaco-like pottery and artifacts. In addition, there were surprisingly few burial sites. Even today, archeologists have located few Chaco-type burials in Chaco Canyon itself. Whatever the burial customs of the Chaco people may have been, they have eluded archeologists for many decades. The absence of burials of this period at Aztec is a clue that probably a group of Chaco-like people, bearing the distinctive Chaco culture, may actually have moved into the Aztec area.Granting that the local sandstone was not quite as easily worked as that at Chaco, the large-size rooms, the high ceilings, the banded-veneer masonry walls, the large doorways, and other techniques used were very similar to the architectural techniques of the Chaco area. Overlying the Chaco debris and sterile sand layers, Morris found pottery, household utensils, and burials characteristic of the classic Mesa Verde Period—a period which occurred later than the great Chaco Period. In addition, there were obvious architectural signs of rebuilding and remodeling within the pueblo. Large Chaco-type rooms had been made smaller by wattle-and-daub partition walls, while doorways had been shortened and narrowed more like the ones at Mesa Verde. Thus there were two definite periods of occupation at Aztec, one by a Chaco-like people and one by a Mesa Verde-type people.The author is primarily concerned witha)Refuting a misconception with specific supportb)Describing the findings of an archaeologist with whom the author partially agreesc)Stating a theory and providing support for itd)Reframing the timeline for the habitation of a historical sitee)Arguing for the existence of different culturesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The two construction periods at Aztec, New Mexico, as indicated by the modern tree-ring dating, are corroborated nicely by other evidence found by archaeologist Earl H. Morris in the 1920’s that Aztec actually was built by one group of people, abandoned, and then reoccupied at a later date by a slightly different group of people. Throughout all the rooms he dug during his early 20th century excavations, he found sterile layers of windblown sand and ruined debris from falling walls and ceilings. In this debris and under the sand, he found Chaco-like pottery and artifacts. In addition, there were surprisingly few burial sites. Even today, archeologists have located few Chaco-type burials in Chaco Canyon itself. Whatever the burial customs of the Chaco people may have been, they have eluded archeologists for many decades. The absence of burials of this period at Aztec is a clue that probably a group of Chaco-like people, bearing the distinctive Chaco culture, may actually have moved into the Aztec area.Granting that the local sandstone was not quite as easily worked as that at Chaco, the large-size rooms, the high ceilings, the banded-veneer masonry walls, the large doorways, and other techniques used were very similar to the architectural techniques of the Chaco area. Overlying the Chaco debris and sterile sand layers, Morris found pottery, household utensils, and burials characteristic of the classic Mesa Verde Period—a period which occurred later than the great Chaco Period. In addition, there were obvious architectural signs of rebuilding and remodeling within the pueblo. Large Chaco-type rooms had been made smaller by wattle-and-daub partition walls, while doorways had been shortened and narrowed more like the ones at Mesa Verde. Thus there were two definite periods of occupation at Aztec, one by a Chaco-like people and one by a Mesa Verde-type people.The author is primarily concerned witha)Refuting a misconception with specific supportb)Describing the findings of an archaeologist with whom the author partially agreesc)Stating a theory and providing support for itd)Reframing the timeline for the habitation of a historical sitee)Arguing for the existence of different culturesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The two construction periods at Aztec, New Mexico, as indicated by the modern tree-ring dating, are corroborated nicely by other evidence found by archaeologist Earl H. Morris in the 1920’s that Aztec actually was built by one group of people, abandoned, and then reoccupied at a later date by a slightly different group of people. Throughout all the rooms he dug during his early 20th century excavations, he found sterile layers of windblown sand and ruined debris from falling walls and ceilings. In this debris and under the sand, he found Chaco-like pottery and artifacts. In addition, there were surprisingly few burial sites. Even today, archeologists have located few Chaco-type burials in Chaco Canyon itself. Whatever the burial customs of the Chaco people may have been, they have eluded archeologists for many decades. The absence of burials of this period at Aztec is a clue that probably a group of Chaco-like people, bearing the distinctive Chaco culture, may actually have moved into the Aztec area.Granting that the local sandstone was not quite as easily worked as that at Chaco, the large-size rooms, the high ceilings, the banded-veneer masonry walls, the large doorways, and other techniques used were very similar to the architectural techniques of the Chaco area. Overlying the Chaco debris and sterile sand layers, Morris found pottery, household utensils, and burials characteristic of the classic Mesa Verde Period—a period which occurred later than the great Chaco Period. In addition, there were obvious architectural signs of rebuilding and remodeling within the pueblo. Large Chaco-type rooms had been made smaller by wattle-and-daub partition walls, while doorways had been shortened and narrowed more like the ones at Mesa Verde. Thus there were two definite periods of occupation at Aztec, one by a Chaco-like people and one by a Mesa Verde-type people.The author is primarily concerned witha)Refuting a misconception with specific supportb)Describing the findings of an archaeologist with whom the author partially agreesc)Stating a theory and providing support for itd)Reframing the timeline for the habitation of a historical sitee)Arguing for the existence of different culturesCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.