DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the persons guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katies archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katies reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best opt...

Join the Discussion on the App

DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option:

Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.
II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.
III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.
Facts: Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.

a)
Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claim
b)
Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the building
c)
Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it published
d)
Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got published

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Practice Test for AILET - 2

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A stat...

In an action for defamation the plaintiff has to prove the following essentials :
(i) the statement must be defamatory,
(ii) the statement must refer to the plaintiff, and
(iii) the statement must be published.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles:I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must have published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defense of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts: Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.

View answer

DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the persons guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katies archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Q. Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide

View answer

DIRECTIONS for the question: Mark the best option: Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must have published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defense of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts: Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.Applying Principle 1 to the facts of the question, decide

View answer

Direction: A principle principles and a fact situation are given in questions decide only on the basis of the principle(s).Principle A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a persons reputation and if the statement has been published The person must have published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the persons guilt.Facts Lakshmi accuses Malika of stealing her watch because she believes that Malika had certairrrnalicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Nastassia, Malikas arch enemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Malika, she publishes the paper in their monthly building review paper.Q. Applying Principle to the facts of the question

View answer

As anticipated, in yet another major ruling titled Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar vs Ramchandra Bhimrao Kondalkar, State of Maharashtra has once again reiterated what even the Supreme Court has time and again reiterated that if allegations of adultery are proved against the wife in a marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance. A wife is entitled to claim maintenance only if she is able to prove that all the allegations of adultery are wrong. A wife cannot maintain relation with some other man and yet claim maintenance from her husband. That's immoral on part of the woman to do so.In sum, the Bombay High Court has very rightly concluded in this latest, landmark and extremely laudable judgment that wife is not entitled to maintenance if allegations of adultery is proved against her. What is important to note here is that the Bombay High Court has also made it clear that just allegations of adultery by the husband are not enough. Those allegations must certainly be proved against her. If they are proved as have been proved in this noteworthy case only then the women will be denied maintenance as she will be held not entitled to do so as we have seen in this latest case also. The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo on the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under Sub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery is proved against such a women or inspite of the husband being ready to maintain her and she refuses to cohabit the women/wife can be refused payment of maintenance."Q. Any marriage may be dissolved (by decree of div or e) on the ground that the other party has, after the solemnization of the marriage had voluntary sexual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse. Nagesh is married to Sapna. Shashank is married to Rhea. Nagesh has sexual intercourse with Rhea. Shashank has sexual intercourse with Sapna.Choose the most appropriate option.

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice DIRECTIONS for the question:Mark the best option:Principles: I. A statement is defamatory in nature if it is injurious to a person s reputation and if the statement has been published.II. The person must ha ve published the defamatory statement himself, or intentionally made the circumstances such that such publication was inevitable.III. The exception to the tort of defamation could be the defence of genuine belief of the person's guilt.Facts:Karen accuses Katie of stealing her watch because she believes that Katie had certain malicious reasons to do so. She pens down her allegations and leaves it on the table. She subsequently forgets about the piece of paper. After a couple of days, Piggychops, Katie's archenemy chances upon the paper. Finding it to be the perfect opportunity to spite Katie, she publishes the paper in the gossip column of The Times of Bollywood.a)Karen is not liable for defamation since she did not doubt the veracity of her claimb)Karen is liable for the defamatory statement since she made the defamatory statement that ruined Katie's reputation in the buildingc)Karen is not liable for the defamatory statement since her act of leaving the paper lying around was negligent and was not intentional for having it publishedd)Karen is liable for defamation since her statement ultimately got publishedCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam