UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Now India's children have a right to rece...
Start Learning for Free
Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.
Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?
- a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.
- b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.
- c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.
- d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years ...
Solution: d) Since (a) is mentioned in the passage, it is not an inference. Look at the keywords carefully while solving such questions.(b) and (c) are generalizations. Hence (d) can be inferred from the discussion about child education rights from the passage.
Most Upvoted Answer
Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years ...
Explanation:
D. There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.
Education received in childhood is irreplaceable and cannot be compensated for later in life. This is particularly crucial for girls who are often denied education due to societal prejudices. Let's break down the key points:
- Childhood Education is Irreplaceable: The passage highlights that the opportunity for education missed during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This is emphasized as childhood is a critical period for learning and development.
- Compensation is Inadequate: Even if a legal battle is fought and won on behalf of a child whose right to education was denied, any compensation offered later may not be sufficient or relevant. This is because the essence and impact of education received in childhood cannot be replicated.
- Significance for Girls: The passage mentions that this fact is particularly true for girls in a society where they are often denied education. Girls are given a limited childhood, making it imperative to ensure their access to education during this crucial period.
- Deep-rooted Prejudices: The societal prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls further exacerbates the challenge of ensuring their right to education. This bias hampers efforts to provide girls with equal opportunities for learning.
In conclusion, the passage underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing the unique significance of childhood education, especially for girls who face additional barriers. It emphasizes that there is no adequate substitute for the education received during childhood, making it essential to ensure that every child, regardless of gender, has access to quality education.
D. There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.
Education received in childhood is irreplaceable and cannot be compensated for later in life. This is particularly crucial for girls who are often denied education due to societal prejudices. Let's break down the key points:
- Childhood Education is Irreplaceable: The passage highlights that the opportunity for education missed during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This is emphasized as childhood is a critical period for learning and development.
- Compensation is Inadequate: Even if a legal battle is fought and won on behalf of a child whose right to education was denied, any compensation offered later may not be sufficient or relevant. This is because the essence and impact of education received in childhood cannot be replicated.
- Significance for Girls: The passage mentions that this fact is particularly true for girls in a society where they are often denied education. Girls are given a limited childhood, making it imperative to ensure their access to education during this crucial period.
- Deep-rooted Prejudices: The societal prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls further exacerbates the challenge of ensuring their right to education. This bias hampers efforts to provide girls with equal opportunities for learning.
In conclusion, the passage underscores the importance of recognizing and addressing the unique significance of childhood education, especially for girls who face additional barriers. It emphasizes that there is no adequate substitute for the education received during childhood, making it essential to ensure that every child, regardless of gender, has access to quality education.
Attention UPSC Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Now India's children have a right to receive at least eight years of education, the gnawing question is whether' it will remain 'on paper' or 'become a reality. One hardly needs a reminder that this right is different from the others enshrined in the Constitution, that the beneficiary - a six year old child cannot demand it, nor can she or he fight a legal battle when the right is denied or violated. In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child. In another peculiarity, where a child's right to education is denied, no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant. This is so because childhood does not last if a legal battle fought on behalf of a child is eventually won, it may be of little use to the boy or girl because the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life. This may be painfully true for girls because our society permits them only a short childhood, if at all. The Right to Education (RTE) has become law at a point in India's history when the ghastly practice of female infanticide has resurfaced in the form of foeticide. This is "symptomatic of a deeper turmoil" in society which compounding the traditional obstacles to the education of girls. "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity and the system of education has not been able to address it.Q. Which one of the following statements conveys the inference of the passage?a)The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls.b)Adults cannot be relied upon to fight on behalf of children for their Right to Education.c)The legal fight to get education for children is often protracted and prohibitive.d)There is no sufficient substitute for education received in childhood.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup