Consider the following statements.1. The authors of tawarikh were usua...
Justification: Statement 1: The authors of Tawarikhs were usually
learned men: secretaries, administrators, poets and courtiers, who both
recounted events and advised rulers on governance, emphasising the
importance of just rule. So, 1 is wrong.
We must also note that:
• the authors of tawarikh lived in cities (mainly Delhi) and hardly
ever in villages.
• They often wrote their histories for Sultans in the hope of rich
rewards.
• These authors advised rulers on the need to preserve an “ideal”
social order based on birthright and gender distinctions. So, 2 is
wrong.
• Their ideas were not shared by everybody.
Q Source: Revision questions: Test 1-2 Syllabus
View all questions of this test
Consider the following statements.1. The authors of tawarikh were usua...
The correct answer is option 'D', None.
Explanation:
Statement 1: The authors of tawarikh were usually ordinary villagers who took the help of learned men to compile their personal experiences for the community's benefit.
- This statement is not entirely accurate. Tawarikh, which refers to historical chronicles or annals, were not usually written by ordinary villagers. In fact, tawarikh were often written by scholars or court historians who had access to official records and sources of information. These writers were usually well-educated and had the necessary skills to compile and document historical events.
- While it is possible that some tawarikh may have been influenced by the personal experiences of individuals from the community, the primary purpose of these chronicles was to provide a comprehensive account of historical events, rather than serving the immediate benefit of the community.
Statement 2: Tawarikhs usually argued about maintaining social equality based on the intrinsic worth of human beings.
- This statement is also not accurate. Tawarikh were primarily concerned with documenting historical events and were not focused on promoting social equality. In many cases, tawarikh were commissioned by rulers or elites to glorify their reign or dynasty. These chronicles often highlighted the achievements of rulers and their noble lineage rather than advocating for social equality.
In conclusion, both statements are incorrect. Tawarikh were not usually written by ordinary villagers, and their main purpose was to document historical events rather than promoting social equality. It is important to carefully evaluate the accuracy of statements and consider the historical context before accepting them as true.