Question Description
Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument.Q.Statement: Should doctors and engineers be banned from civil services examination?Arguments: I. No, banning engineers and medicos from joining civil services means denying the best talent in the land to work for the welfare of the society.II. Yes, taxpayers money is being used to finance the studies of doctors and engineers, particularly in government institutes. The money spent on them goes down the drain once a medico or engineer shifts tracks to civil services.a)If both I and II are “strong”.b)If only argument II is “strong”.c)If neither I nor II is “strong”.d)If only argument I is “strong”.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument.Q.Statement: Should doctors and engineers be banned from civil services examination?Arguments: I. No, banning engineers and medicos from joining civil services means denying the best talent in the land to work for the welfare of the society.II. Yes, taxpayers money is being used to finance the studies of doctors and engineers, particularly in government institutes. The money spent on them goes down the drain once a medico or engineer shifts tracks to civil services.a)If both I and II are “strong”.b)If only argument II is “strong”.c)If neither I nor II is “strong”.d)If only argument I is “strong”.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument.Q.Statement: Should doctors and engineers be banned from civil services examination?Arguments: I. No, banning engineers and medicos from joining civil services means denying the best talent in the land to work for the welfare of the society.II. Yes, taxpayers money is being used to finance the studies of doctors and engineers, particularly in government institutes. The money spent on them goes down the drain once a medico or engineer shifts tracks to civil services.a)If both I and II are “strong”.b)If only argument II is “strong”.c)If neither I nor II is “strong”.d)If only argument I is “strong”.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument.Q.Statement: Should doctors and engineers be banned from civil services examination?Arguments: I. No, banning engineers and medicos from joining civil services means denying the best talent in the land to work for the welfare of the society.II. Yes, taxpayers money is being used to finance the studies of doctors and engineers, particularly in government institutes. The money spent on them goes down the drain once a medico or engineer shifts tracks to civil services.a)If both I and II are “strong”.b)If only argument II is “strong”.c)If neither I nor II is “strong”.d)If only argument I is “strong”.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument.Q.Statement: Should doctors and engineers be banned from civil services examination?Arguments: I. No, banning engineers and medicos from joining civil services means denying the best talent in the land to work for the welfare of the society.II. Yes, taxpayers money is being used to finance the studies of doctors and engineers, particularly in government institutes. The money spent on them goes down the drain once a medico or engineer shifts tracks to civil services.a)If both I and II are “strong”.b)If only argument II is “strong”.c)If neither I nor II is “strong”.d)If only argument I is “strong”.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument.Q.Statement: Should doctors and engineers be banned from civil services examination?Arguments: I. No, banning engineers and medicos from joining civil services means denying the best talent in the land to work for the welfare of the society.II. Yes, taxpayers money is being used to finance the studies of doctors and engineers, particularly in government institutes. The money spent on them goes down the drain once a medico or engineer shifts tracks to civil services.a)If both I and II are “strong”.b)If only argument II is “strong”.c)If neither I nor II is “strong”.d)If only argument I is “strong”.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument.Q.Statement: Should doctors and engineers be banned from civil services examination?Arguments: I. No, banning engineers and medicos from joining civil services means denying the best talent in the land to work for the welfare of the society.II. Yes, taxpayers money is being used to finance the studies of doctors and engineers, particularly in government institutes. The money spent on them goes down the drain once a medico or engineer shifts tracks to civil services.a)If both I and II are “strong”.b)If only argument II is “strong”.c)If neither I nor II is “strong”.d)If only argument I is “strong”.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument.Q.Statement: Should doctors and engineers be banned from civil services examination?Arguments: I. No, banning engineers and medicos from joining civil services means denying the best talent in the land to work for the welfare of the society.II. Yes, taxpayers money is being used to finance the studies of doctors and engineers, particularly in government institutes. The money spent on them goes down the drain once a medico or engineer shifts tracks to civil services.a)If both I and II are “strong”.b)If only argument II is “strong”.c)If neither I nor II is “strong”.d)If only argument I is “strong”.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions : In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a “strong” argument is and which is a “weak” argument.Q.Statement: Should doctors and engineers be banned from civil services examination?Arguments: I. No, banning engineers and medicos from joining civil services means denying the best talent in the land to work for the welfare of the society.II. Yes, taxpayers money is being used to finance the studies of doctors and engineers, particularly in government institutes. The money spent on them goes down the drain once a medico or engineer shifts tracks to civil services.a)If both I and II are “strong”.b)If only argument II is “strong”.c)If neither I nor II is “strong”.d)If only argument I is “strong”.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.