CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural l... Start Learning for Free
Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.
As introduced by 73rd and 74th amendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.
On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.
Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.
Q. Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?
  • a)
    Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.
  • b)
    No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.
  • c)
    No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.
  • d)
    Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due ...
The circumstances of the facts make it clear that if the producer did not comply with the demands of Anand, he could be harmed or injured by him. As Anand is a well-known don, it becomes certain as to the consequences of not obliging to his demands.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. As far as the above paragraph is concerend would the government be then justified to not conduct election?

Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly attributed to the author of the above passage?

Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.According to the passage, what 73rdand 74thamendment deals with

It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?

Passage:Management is a set of processesthat can keep a complicated system of people and technology running smoothly. The most important aspects of management include planning, budgeting, organizing, staffing, controlling, and problem-solving. Leadership is a set of processes that creates organisations in the first place or adapts them to significantly changing circumstances. Leadership defines what the future should look like, aligns people with that vision, and inspires them to make it happen despite the obstacles. This distinction is absolutely crucial for our purposes here: Successful transformation is 70 to 90 per cent leadership and only 10 to 30 per cent management. Yet for historical reasons, many organisations today don‘t have much leadership. And almost everyone thinks about the problems here as one of managing change. For most of this century, as we created thousands and thousands of large organizations for the first time in human history, we didn‘t have enough good managers to keep all those burrreaucracies functioning. So many companies and universities developed management programmes, and hundreds and thousands of people were encouraged to learn management on the job. And they did. But, people were taught little about leadership. To some degree, management was emphasized because it‘s easier to teach than leadership. But even more so, management was the main item on the twentieth-century agenda because that‘s what was needed. For every entrepreneur or business builder who was a leader, we needed hundreds of managers to run their ever growing enterprises. Unfortunately for us today, this emphasis on management has often been institutionalized in corporate cultures that discourage employees from learning how to lead. Ironically, past success is usually the key ingredient in producing this outcome.The syndrome, as I have observed it on many occasions, goes like this: success creates some degree of market dominance, which in turn produces much growth. After a while keeping the ever larger organizations under control becomes the primary challenge. So attention turns inward, and managerial competencies are nurtured. With a strong emphasis on management but not on leadership, bureaucracy and an inward focus take over. But with continued success, the result mostly of market dominance, the problem often goes unaddressed and an unhealthy arrogance begins to evolve. All of these characteristics then make any transformation effort much more difficult. Arrogant managers can over- evaluate their current performance and competitive position, listen poorly, and learn slowly. Inwardly focused employees can have difficulty seeing the very forces that present threats and opportunities.Bureaucratic cultures an smother those who want to respond to shifting conditions. And the lack of leadership leaves no fore inside these organizations to break out of the morass.Q.In the passage, management is equated with

Top Courses for CLAT

Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev