Question Description
Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. Let us say the present government facing extreme wrath and violence on the part of the group demanding separate country for local Tamil population. Now would the government be then justified to not conduct election?a)Yes; without controlling the antisocial element how can government function.b)No; the Government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was occurrence of any kind of separatist or naxal movement.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development but as per the given question it can be delayed when the government is facing naxal or any separatist movement.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.