Question Description
It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?a)The presence of robust machinery at the local level is a measure of the health of democracy and people’s participation is extremely important.b)The local administration bodies and their elections can be overridden by court since their role is to protect local bodies.c)At this juncture, lack of election of local bodies is bound to have no effect.d)Local body elections neither serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures nor enables them to stay closely connected with the voters.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?a)The presence of robust machinery at the local level is a measure of the health of democracy and people’s participation is extremely important.b)The local administration bodies and their elections can be overridden by court since their role is to protect local bodies.c)At this juncture, lack of election of local bodies is bound to have no effect.d)Local body elections neither serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures nor enables them to stay closely connected with the voters.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?a)The presence of robust machinery at the local level is a measure of the health of democracy and people’s participation is extremely important.b)The local administration bodies and their elections can be overridden by court since their role is to protect local bodies.c)At this juncture, lack of election of local bodies is bound to have no effect.d)Local body elections neither serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures nor enables them to stay closely connected with the voters.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?a)The presence of robust machinery at the local level is a measure of the health of democracy and people’s participation is extremely important.b)The local administration bodies and their elections can be overridden by court since their role is to protect local bodies.c)At this juncture, lack of election of local bodies is bound to have no effect.d)Local body elections neither serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures nor enables them to stay closely connected with the voters.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?a)The presence of robust machinery at the local level is a measure of the health of democracy and people’s participation is extremely important.b)The local administration bodies and their elections can be overridden by court since their role is to protect local bodies.c)At this juncture, lack of election of local bodies is bound to have no effect.d)Local body elections neither serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures nor enables them to stay closely connected with the voters.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?a)The presence of robust machinery at the local level is a measure of the health of democracy and people’s participation is extremely important.b)The local administration bodies and their elections can be overridden by court since their role is to protect local bodies.c)At this juncture, lack of election of local bodies is bound to have no effect.d)Local body elections neither serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures nor enables them to stay closely connected with the voters.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?a)The presence of robust machinery at the local level is a measure of the health of democracy and people’s participation is extremely important.b)The local administration bodies and their elections can be overridden by court since their role is to protect local bodies.c)At this juncture, lack of election of local bodies is bound to have no effect.d)Local body elections neither serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures nor enables them to stay closely connected with the voters.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?a)The presence of robust machinery at the local level is a measure of the health of democracy and people’s participation is extremely important.b)The local administration bodies and their elections can be overridden by court since their role is to protect local bodies.c)At this juncture, lack of election of local bodies is bound to have no effect.d)Local body elections neither serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures nor enables them to stay closely connected with the voters.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?a)The presence of robust machinery at the local level is a measure of the health of democracy and people’s participation is extremely important.b)The local administration bodies and their elections can be overridden by court since their role is to protect local bodies.c)At this juncture, lack of election of local bodies is bound to have no effect.d)Local body elections neither serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures nor enables them to stay closely connected with the voters.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.