Itandrsquo;s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and peopleandrsquo;s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening peopleandrsquo;s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > It’s been more than two decades since t...

It’s been more than two decades since the 73^rd and 74^th constitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.

After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.

Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.

Q. Suppose the 73^rd and 74^th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:

a)
The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.
b)
No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.
c)
No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.
d)
Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstituti...

The question is would the government be then justified to not conduct election under the changed provision and fact. Answer would be (A). (D) and (C) are irrelevant to the question. (B) is direct contradiction to the given question.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Would the situation be applicable in above situation of delay in election?

View answer

It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Which of the following views can be correctly inferred from the above passage?

View answer

In 2015, the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000, as unconstitutional. That decision, Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, was heaped with praise by domestic and foreign media alike. But none of this stopped the police in Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, from arresting and detaining 18-year-old Tyagi in October 2017, for allegedly committing a crime under Section 66A - for posting some comments on Facebook. Mr. Tyagi's case is not alone.Media outlets have reported other instances where Section 66A has been invoked by the police, all of which points to an obvious, and serious, concern: what is the point of that landmark decision if the police still jail persons under unconstitutional laws?From police stations, to trial courts, and all the way up to the High Courts, we found Section 66A was still in vogue throughout the legal system. Equally disturbing was the discovery that this issue of applying unconstitutional penal laws long preceded Shreya Singhal and Section 66A. Before the recent decisions that held provisions in the Indian Penal Code as unconstitutional (in whole or in part), the Supreme Court had famously done this, in 1983, by striking down Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code in Mithu v. State of Punjab.In 2012, years after Section 303 had been struck down, the Rajasthan High Court intervened to save a person from being hanged for being convicted under that offence.We argue that a primary reason for poor enforcement of judicial declarations of unconstitutionality is signal failures between different branches of government. Commonly, in this context one thinks of active non-compliance that can undermine the work of courts - for instance, the aftermath of the Sabarimala verdict. But these publicised acts of defiance have hidden what is a systemic problem within the Indian legal system: there exists no official method for sharing information about such decisions, even those of constitutional import such as Shreya Singhal. We found that there is no formal system on information sharing in the hierarchical set-up of the Indian judiciary.Thus, enforcing unconstitutional laws is sheer wastage of public money. But more importantly, until this basic flaw within is addressed, certain persons will remain exposed to denial of their right to life and personal liberty in the worst possible way imaginable. They will suffer the indignity of lawless arrest and detention, for no reason other than their poverty and ignorance, and inability to demand their rights.Q. Which of the following views can be correctly attributed to the author of the above passage?

View answer

In 2015, the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000, as unconstitutional. That decision, Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, was heaped with praise by domestic and foreign media alike. But none of this stopped the police in Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, from arresting and detaining 18-year-old Tyagi in October 2017, for allegedly committing a crime under Section 66A - for posting some comments on Facebook. Mr. Tyagi's case is not alone.Media outlets have reported other instances where Section 66A has been invoked by the police, all of which points to an obvious, and serious, concern: what is the point of that landmark decision if the police still jail persons under unconstitutional laws?From police stations, to trial courts, and all the way up to the High Courts, we found Section 66A was still in vogue throughout the legal system. Equally disturbing was the discovery that this issue of applying unconstitutional penal laws long preceded Shreya Singhal and Section 66A. Before the recent decisions that held provisions in the Indian Penal Code as unconstitutional (in whole or in part), the Supreme Court had famously done this, in 1983, by striking down Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code in Mithu v. State of Punjab.In 2012, years after Section 303 had been struck down, the Rajasthan High Court intervened to save a person from being hanged for being convicted under that offence.We argue that a primary reason for poor enforcement of judicial declarations of unconstitutionality is signal failures between different branches of government. Commonly, in this context one thinks of active non-compliance that can undermine the work of courts - for instance, the aftermath of the Sabarimala verdict. But these publicised acts of defiance have hidden what is a systemic problem within the Indian legal system: there exists no official method for sharing information about such decisions, even those of constitutional import such as Shreya Singhal. We found that there is no formal system on information sharing in the hierarchical set-up of the Indian judiciary.Thus, enforcing unconstitutional laws is sheer wastage of public money. But more importantly, until this basic flaw within is addressed, certain persons will remain exposed to denial of their right to life and personal liberty in the worst possible way imaginable. They will suffer the indignity of lawless arrest and detention, for no reason other than their poverty and ignorance, and inability to demand their rights.Q. A Bill is introduced in the Parliament obliging the Constitutional Courts and the Superior Judiciary to issue circulars to subordinate courts apprising about the recent orders and judgments. In such a situation, according to the author

View answer

In 2015, the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000, as unconstitutional. That decision, Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, was heaped with praise by domestic and foreign media alike. But none of this stopped the police in Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, from arresting and detaining 18-year-old Tyagi in October 2017, for allegedly committing a crime under Section 66A - for posting some comments on Facebook. Mr. Tyagi's case is not alone.Media outlets have reported other instances where Section 66A has been invoked by the police, all of which points to an obvious, and serious, concern: what is the point of that landmark decision if the police still jail persons under unconstitutional laws?From police stations, to trial courts, and all the way up to the High Courts, we found Section 66A was still in vogue throughout the legal system. Equally disturbing was the discovery that this issue of applying unconstitutional penal laws long preceded Shreya Singhal and Section 66A. Before the recent decisions that held provisions in the Indian Penal Code as unconstitutional (in whole or in part), the Supreme Court had famously done this, in 1983, by striking down Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code in Mithu v. State of Punjab.In 2012, years after Section 303 had been struck down, the Rajasthan High Court intervened to save a person from being hanged for being convicted under that offence.We argue that a primary reason for poor enforcement of judicial declarations of unconstitutionality is signal failures between different branches of government. Commonly, in this context one thinks of active non-compliance that can undermine the work of courts - for instance, the aftermath of the Sabarimala verdict. But these publicised acts of defiance have hidden what is a systemic problem within the Indian legal system: there exists no official method for sharing information about such decisions, even those of constitutional import such as Shreya Singhal. We found that there is no formal system on information sharing in the hierarchical set-up of the Indian judiciary.Thus, enforcing unconstitutional laws is sheer wastage of public money. But more importantly, until this basic flaw within is addressed, certain persons will remain exposed to denial of their right to life and personal liberty in the worst possible way imaginable. They will suffer the indignity of lawless arrest and detention, for no reason other than their poverty and ignorance, and inability to demand their rights.Q. It is commonly observed that even after a law is declared unconstitutional, law remains a part of statute repository published on India Code. Based on the author's reasoning, which of the following would be most correct

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice It’s been more than two decades since the 73rdand 74thconstitutional amendments were passed by parliament, which accorded constitutional status to local administration bodies across India. Yet, the Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. This unconstitutional delay started when the madras high court cancelled the notification put forward by the state government citing irregularities in it. The reasons cited for subsequent postponements revolved around delimitation and carving out new districts.After resorting to the infamous ordinance route to extend the tenure of the special officers of local bodies and some back and forth on the means of electing mayors and municipal chairmen, the state will now see elections being held for rural local bodies alone in two phases on December 27 and 30. The elections to urban local bodies are expected to be notified soon, which in itself raises questions on the constitutional and moral validity of the time gap between rural and urban local body elections. This piece attempts to situate the implications of the delay in the conduct of elections to make a case for the significance of local bodies in the domains of efficacy, inclusiveness, participation and strength of political party structures.Criticisms of bureaucratic hassles and delays apart, the importance of local bodies cannot be discounted, especially in the context of their role in the public delivery of services such as the public distribution system, pension schemes, and mitigation of disease outbreaks and disasters. While the ranks secured by the state are signifiers of the outcomes, primarily highlighting the efficacy in delivery of services to the public today, scholars argue that decentralization and people’s participation increased in the state since the 1970s, thanks to the sociopolitical movements in the state. Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the 73rd and 74th provided for exceptional cases where a delay in election of local bodies was justified in case of force majure meaning a situation where the election is delayed due to an act of god or natural disaster. Presume government had to delay the election of local bodies for a month because the continuously faced extreme events like earthquake followed by tsunami and volcano. In such a situation, according to the author:a)The delay would be justified as per the exception provided in the amendment.b)No; the government should not have delayed the election of local bodies as nothing in passage shows that there was no occurrence of any kind of natural disaster.c)No; conducting election on time no matter what is essential for government.d)Yes; election conducted on time provides opportunities for strengthening people’s participation in decision making and speed up the pace of rural development.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam