CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  The two graphs below gives the crime statisti... Start Learning for Free
The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.


The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.
(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.
(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.
Q. In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?
  • a)
    1.1 x 1.06
  • b)
    1.1 x 103
  • c)
    3.9
  • d)
    3.9 x 103
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 giv...
Total number of two-wheelers sold in 5 months = 300 + 350 + 250 + 400 + 200 = 1,500
Number of black two-wheelers sold in 5 months = 15% of 1,500
= 0.15 × 1,500
= 225
Average number of black two-wheelers sold in each month = 225 ÷ 5
= 45
Number of blue two-wheelers sold in 5 months = 12% of 1,500
= 0.12 × 1,500
= 180
Average number of blue two-wheelers sold in each month = 180 ÷ 5
= 36
Required difference = 45 – 36
= 9
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

In simple terms, TRPs represent how many people, from which socio-economic categories, watched which channels for how much time during a particular period. This could be for an hour, a day, or even a week; India follows the international standard of one minute. The data is usually made public every week. BARC has installed “BAR-O-meters” in over 45,000 empanelled households. While watching a show, members of the household register their presence by pressing their viewer ID button — every person in household has a separate ID — thus capturing the duration for which the channel was watched and by whom, and providing data on viewership habits across age and socio-economic groups. The panel chosen to capture TRPs must be representative of the country’s population, and the methodology must be economically viable for the industry. If broadcasters can find the households where devices are installed, they can either bribe them to watch their channels, or ask cable operators or multi-system operators to ensure their channel is available as the “landing page” when the TV is switched on. For TRPs, it does not matter what the entire country is watching, but essentially what the 45,000-odd households supposed to represent TV viewership of the country have watched. Broadcasters can target these households to fudge actual viewership data. TRAI mentioned “panel infiltration has a significant impact when the panel size is smaller” and “with the increase in panel size, infiltration of panel homes becomes challenging”. When the sample is smaller, “manipulation becomes easier”. In a genre like English news, “because fewer homes will have larger weightage, change in behaviour of one home gets amplified at a much larger scale nationwide”. Additionally, as each channel tries to project itself as a market leader in a particular segment, it slices the data into socio-economic brackets on the basis of NCCS, age, gender, time slots (primetim e) etc to find the perfect data slice. This too increases relative error in the data, because of the small sample size.Q. As per author, which of the following opens up, if the sample size of the panel for TRP is not adequately large?

In simple terms, TRPs represent how many people, from which socio-economic categories, watched which channels for how much time during a particular period. This could be for an hour, a day, or even a week; India follows the international standard of one minute. The data is usually made public every week. BARC has installed “BAR-O-meters” in over 45,000 empanelled households. While watching a show, members of the household register their presence by pressing their viewer ID button — every person in household has a separate ID — thus capturing the duration for which the channel was watched and by whom, and providing data on viewership habits across age and socio-economic groups. The panel chosen to capture TRPs must be representative of the country’s population, and the methodology must be economically viable for the industry. If broadcasters can find the households where devices are installed, they can either bribe them to watch their channels, or ask cable operators or multi-system operators to ensure their channel is available as the “landing page” when the TV is switched on. For TRPs, it does not matter what the entire country is watching, but essentially what the 45,000-odd households supposed to represent TV viewership of the country have watched. Broadcasters can target these households to fudge actual viewership data. TRAI mentioned “panel infiltration has a significant impact when the panel size is smaller” and “with the increase in panel size, infiltration of panel homes becomes challenging”. When the sample is smaller, “manipulation becomes easier”. In a genre like English news, “because fewer homes will have larger weightage, change in behaviour of one home gets amplified at a much larger scale nationwide”. Additionally, as each channel tries to project itself as a market leader in a particular segment, it slices the data into socio-economic brackets on the basis of NCCS, age, gender, time slots (primetim e) etc to find the perfect data slice. This too increases relative error in the data, because of the small sample size.Q. Which of the following statements, most aptly tells the criticism of the TRP system?

Top Courses for CLAT

The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.Q.In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?a)1.1 x 1.06b)1.1 x 103c)3.9d)3.9 x 103Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.Q.In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?a)1.1 x 1.06b)1.1 x 103c)3.9d)3.9 x 103Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.Q.In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?a)1.1 x 1.06b)1.1 x 103c)3.9d)3.9 x 103Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.Q.In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?a)1.1 x 1.06b)1.1 x 103c)3.9d)3.9 x 103Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.Q.In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?a)1.1 x 1.06b)1.1 x 103c)3.9d)3.9 x 103Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.Q.In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?a)1.1 x 1.06b)1.1 x 103c)3.9d)3.9 x 103Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.Q.In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?a)1.1 x 1.06b)1.1 x 103c)3.9d)3.9 x 103Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.Q.In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?a)1.1 x 1.06b)1.1 x 103c)3.9d)3.9 x 103Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.Q.In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?a)1.1 x 1.06b)1.1 x 103c)3.9d)3.9 x 103Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The two graphs below gives the crime statistics for the USA. Fig 1 give the variation of the number of property crimes per 1000 households with time. Property crimes consist of motor vehicle theft, theft and burglary. Fig 2 gives the number of violent crimes per 1000 population with time. Violent following can be divisible into three categories – aggravated assault, simple assault and robbery.The following facts are also given and may be used in answering the questions that follow.(1) The population of the USA between 1975 and 2050 is by the equation P = 2.3 (T - 1950) + 157, where P is the population in millions in the year T.(2) The number of persons per household can assumed to remain constant for the period 1975 to 2050.Q.In 2000, the number of aggravated assaults/1000 population was greater the number of robberies/1000 population by 1.8 and the number of simple assaults was three time the number of aggravated assaults. What was the total number of robberies in 2000?a)1.1 x 1.06b)1.1 x 103c)3.9d)3.9 x 103Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev