Question Description
Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Right of entry to education, an ample teaching-learning environment, a suitable curriculum and an empowered and allencompassing faculty are four essential prerequisites of an education system that seeks to enable social transformation. While educational reform since the 1980s was strongly focused on the first two elements, the late 1990s brought the role of the curriculum into national focus. The critical link that binds these four critical elements together-the activity of the facultycontinues to be cast aside, by political ideologies of most hues, contemporary curriculum reform efforts and the professional practices of the faculty. In many instances this has led to extreme politicization of the college faculty. In others it has led to the education of a generation of students in half-truths underpinned by the personal beliefs, sectarian concerns andfolk pedagogy of faculties who have had little access themselves to education and training in related areas. Over the last decade or so, educational reform has included, apart from access, a focus on developing alternative text materials, and the training of faculty to handle these materials, without directly engaging with the issue of curriculum revamp. The subsequent change of national government in 2004 led to the curriculum review in 2005, underlining a new political interest in the role of education in national development, its role in social mobilization and transformation directed specifically at questions of caste and gender asymmetry and minority empowerment. Deeper than these politically driven initiatives, however, the professional need for curriculum review emerges from the long ossification of a national education system that continues to view faculty as "dispensers of information" and students as "passive recipients" of an "education" sought to be "delivered" in fourwalled classrooms with little scope to develop critical thinking and understanding.Q.Prior to 1990 what was NOT on the agenda of the educational reforms?1. An appropriate curriculum2. Well-managed admission processa)Only 1b)Only 2c)Both 1 and 2d)Either 1 or 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Right of entry to education, an ample teaching-learning environment, a suitable curriculum and an empowered and allencompassing faculty are four essential prerequisites of an education system that seeks to enable social transformation. While educational reform since the 1980s was strongly focused on the first two elements, the late 1990s brought the role of the curriculum into national focus. The critical link that binds these four critical elements together-the activity of the facultycontinues to be cast aside, by political ideologies of most hues, contemporary curriculum reform efforts and the professional practices of the faculty. In many instances this has led to extreme politicization of the college faculty. In others it has led to the education of a generation of students in half-truths underpinned by the personal beliefs, sectarian concerns andfolk pedagogy of faculties who have had little access themselves to education and training in related areas. Over the last decade or so, educational reform has included, apart from access, a focus on developing alternative text materials, and the training of faculty to handle these materials, without directly engaging with the issue of curriculum revamp. The subsequent change of national government in 2004 led to the curriculum review in 2005, underlining a new political interest in the role of education in national development, its role in social mobilization and transformation directed specifically at questions of caste and gender asymmetry and minority empowerment. Deeper than these politically driven initiatives, however, the professional need for curriculum review emerges from the long ossification of a national education system that continues to view faculty as "dispensers of information" and students as "passive recipients" of an "education" sought to be "delivered" in fourwalled classrooms with little scope to develop critical thinking and understanding.Q.Prior to 1990 what was NOT on the agenda of the educational reforms?1. An appropriate curriculum2. Well-managed admission processa)Only 1b)Only 2c)Both 1 and 2d)Either 1 or 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Right of entry to education, an ample teaching-learning environment, a suitable curriculum and an empowered and allencompassing faculty are four essential prerequisites of an education system that seeks to enable social transformation. While educational reform since the 1980s was strongly focused on the first two elements, the late 1990s brought the role of the curriculum into national focus. The critical link that binds these four critical elements together-the activity of the facultycontinues to be cast aside, by political ideologies of most hues, contemporary curriculum reform efforts and the professional practices of the faculty. In many instances this has led to extreme politicization of the college faculty. In others it has led to the education of a generation of students in half-truths underpinned by the personal beliefs, sectarian concerns andfolk pedagogy of faculties who have had little access themselves to education and training in related areas. Over the last decade or so, educational reform has included, apart from access, a focus on developing alternative text materials, and the training of faculty to handle these materials, without directly engaging with the issue of curriculum revamp. The subsequent change of national government in 2004 led to the curriculum review in 2005, underlining a new political interest in the role of education in national development, its role in social mobilization and transformation directed specifically at questions of caste and gender asymmetry and minority empowerment. Deeper than these politically driven initiatives, however, the professional need for curriculum review emerges from the long ossification of a national education system that continues to view faculty as "dispensers of information" and students as "passive recipients" of an "education" sought to be "delivered" in fourwalled classrooms with little scope to develop critical thinking and understanding.Q.Prior to 1990 what was NOT on the agenda of the educational reforms?1. An appropriate curriculum2. Well-managed admission processa)Only 1b)Only 2c)Both 1 and 2d)Either 1 or 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Right of entry to education, an ample teaching-learning environment, a suitable curriculum and an empowered and allencompassing faculty are four essential prerequisites of an education system that seeks to enable social transformation. While educational reform since the 1980s was strongly focused on the first two elements, the late 1990s brought the role of the curriculum into national focus. The critical link that binds these four critical elements together-the activity of the facultycontinues to be cast aside, by political ideologies of most hues, contemporary curriculum reform efforts and the professional practices of the faculty. In many instances this has led to extreme politicization of the college faculty. In others it has led to the education of a generation of students in half-truths underpinned by the personal beliefs, sectarian concerns andfolk pedagogy of faculties who have had little access themselves to education and training in related areas. Over the last decade or so, educational reform has included, apart from access, a focus on developing alternative text materials, and the training of faculty to handle these materials, without directly engaging with the issue of curriculum revamp. The subsequent change of national government in 2004 led to the curriculum review in 2005, underlining a new political interest in the role of education in national development, its role in social mobilization and transformation directed specifically at questions of caste and gender asymmetry and minority empowerment. Deeper than these politically driven initiatives, however, the professional need for curriculum review emerges from the long ossification of a national education system that continues to view faculty as "dispensers of information" and students as "passive recipients" of an "education" sought to be "delivered" in fourwalled classrooms with little scope to develop critical thinking and understanding.Q.Prior to 1990 what was NOT on the agenda of the educational reforms?1. An appropriate curriculum2. Well-managed admission processa)Only 1b)Only 2c)Both 1 and 2d)Either 1 or 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Right of entry to education, an ample teaching-learning environment, a suitable curriculum and an empowered and allencompassing faculty are four essential prerequisites of an education system that seeks to enable social transformation. While educational reform since the 1980s was strongly focused on the first two elements, the late 1990s brought the role of the curriculum into national focus. The critical link that binds these four critical elements together-the activity of the facultycontinues to be cast aside, by political ideologies of most hues, contemporary curriculum reform efforts and the professional practices of the faculty. In many instances this has led to extreme politicization of the college faculty. In others it has led to the education of a generation of students in half-truths underpinned by the personal beliefs, sectarian concerns andfolk pedagogy of faculties who have had little access themselves to education and training in related areas. Over the last decade or so, educational reform has included, apart from access, a focus on developing alternative text materials, and the training of faculty to handle these materials, without directly engaging with the issue of curriculum revamp. The subsequent change of national government in 2004 led to the curriculum review in 2005, underlining a new political interest in the role of education in national development, its role in social mobilization and transformation directed specifically at questions of caste and gender asymmetry and minority empowerment. Deeper than these politically driven initiatives, however, the professional need for curriculum review emerges from the long ossification of a national education system that continues to view faculty as "dispensers of information" and students as "passive recipients" of an "education" sought to be "delivered" in fourwalled classrooms with little scope to develop critical thinking and understanding.Q.Prior to 1990 what was NOT on the agenda of the educational reforms?1. An appropriate curriculum2. Well-managed admission processa)Only 1b)Only 2c)Both 1 and 2d)Either 1 or 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Right of entry to education, an ample teaching-learning environment, a suitable curriculum and an empowered and allencompassing faculty are four essential prerequisites of an education system that seeks to enable social transformation. While educational reform since the 1980s was strongly focused on the first two elements, the late 1990s brought the role of the curriculum into national focus. The critical link that binds these four critical elements together-the activity of the facultycontinues to be cast aside, by political ideologies of most hues, contemporary curriculum reform efforts and the professional practices of the faculty. In many instances this has led to extreme politicization of the college faculty. In others it has led to the education of a generation of students in half-truths underpinned by the personal beliefs, sectarian concerns andfolk pedagogy of faculties who have had little access themselves to education and training in related areas. Over the last decade or so, educational reform has included, apart from access, a focus on developing alternative text materials, and the training of faculty to handle these materials, without directly engaging with the issue of curriculum revamp. The subsequent change of national government in 2004 led to the curriculum review in 2005, underlining a new political interest in the role of education in national development, its role in social mobilization and transformation directed specifically at questions of caste and gender asymmetry and minority empowerment. Deeper than these politically driven initiatives, however, the professional need for curriculum review emerges from the long ossification of a national education system that continues to view faculty as "dispensers of information" and students as "passive recipients" of an "education" sought to be "delivered" in fourwalled classrooms with little scope to develop critical thinking and understanding.Q.Prior to 1990 what was NOT on the agenda of the educational reforms?1. An appropriate curriculum2. Well-managed admission processa)Only 1b)Only 2c)Both 1 and 2d)Either 1 or 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Right of entry to education, an ample teaching-learning environment, a suitable curriculum and an empowered and allencompassing faculty are four essential prerequisites of an education system that seeks to enable social transformation. While educational reform since the 1980s was strongly focused on the first two elements, the late 1990s brought the role of the curriculum into national focus. The critical link that binds these four critical elements together-the activity of the facultycontinues to be cast aside, by political ideologies of most hues, contemporary curriculum reform efforts and the professional practices of the faculty. In many instances this has led to extreme politicization of the college faculty. In others it has led to the education of a generation of students in half-truths underpinned by the personal beliefs, sectarian concerns andfolk pedagogy of faculties who have had little access themselves to education and training in related areas. Over the last decade or so, educational reform has included, apart from access, a focus on developing alternative text materials, and the training of faculty to handle these materials, without directly engaging with the issue of curriculum revamp. The subsequent change of national government in 2004 led to the curriculum review in 2005, underlining a new political interest in the role of education in national development, its role in social mobilization and transformation directed specifically at questions of caste and gender asymmetry and minority empowerment. Deeper than these politically driven initiatives, however, the professional need for curriculum review emerges from the long ossification of a national education system that continues to view faculty as "dispensers of information" and students as "passive recipients" of an "education" sought to be "delivered" in fourwalled classrooms with little scope to develop critical thinking and understanding.Q.Prior to 1990 what was NOT on the agenda of the educational reforms?1. An appropriate curriculum2. Well-managed admission processa)Only 1b)Only 2c)Both 1 and 2d)Either 1 or 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Right of entry to education, an ample teaching-learning environment, a suitable curriculum and an empowered and allencompassing faculty are four essential prerequisites of an education system that seeks to enable social transformation. While educational reform since the 1980s was strongly focused on the first two elements, the late 1990s brought the role of the curriculum into national focus. The critical link that binds these four critical elements together-the activity of the facultycontinues to be cast aside, by political ideologies of most hues, contemporary curriculum reform efforts and the professional practices of the faculty. In many instances this has led to extreme politicization of the college faculty. In others it has led to the education of a generation of students in half-truths underpinned by the personal beliefs, sectarian concerns andfolk pedagogy of faculties who have had little access themselves to education and training in related areas. Over the last decade or so, educational reform has included, apart from access, a focus on developing alternative text materials, and the training of faculty to handle these materials, without directly engaging with the issue of curriculum revamp. The subsequent change of national government in 2004 led to the curriculum review in 2005, underlining a new political interest in the role of education in national development, its role in social mobilization and transformation directed specifically at questions of caste and gender asymmetry and minority empowerment. Deeper than these politically driven initiatives, however, the professional need for curriculum review emerges from the long ossification of a national education system that continues to view faculty as "dispensers of information" and students as "passive recipients" of an "education" sought to be "delivered" in fourwalled classrooms with little scope to develop critical thinking and understanding.Q.Prior to 1990 what was NOT on the agenda of the educational reforms?1. An appropriate curriculum2. Well-managed admission processa)Only 1b)Only 2c)Both 1 and 2d)Either 1 or 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Right of entry to education, an ample teaching-learning environment, a suitable curriculum and an empowered and allencompassing faculty are four essential prerequisites of an education system that seeks to enable social transformation. While educational reform since the 1980s was strongly focused on the first two elements, the late 1990s brought the role of the curriculum into national focus. The critical link that binds these four critical elements together-the activity of the facultycontinues to be cast aside, by political ideologies of most hues, contemporary curriculum reform efforts and the professional practices of the faculty. In many instances this has led to extreme politicization of the college faculty. In others it has led to the education of a generation of students in half-truths underpinned by the personal beliefs, sectarian concerns andfolk pedagogy of faculties who have had little access themselves to education and training in related areas. Over the last decade or so, educational reform has included, apart from access, a focus on developing alternative text materials, and the training of faculty to handle these materials, without directly engaging with the issue of curriculum revamp. The subsequent change of national government in 2004 led to the curriculum review in 2005, underlining a new political interest in the role of education in national development, its role in social mobilization and transformation directed specifically at questions of caste and gender asymmetry and minority empowerment. Deeper than these politically driven initiatives, however, the professional need for curriculum review emerges from the long ossification of a national education system that continues to view faculty as "dispensers of information" and students as "passive recipients" of an "education" sought to be "delivered" in fourwalled classrooms with little scope to develop critical thinking and understanding.Q.Prior to 1990 what was NOT on the agenda of the educational reforms?1. An appropriate curriculum2. Well-managed admission processa)Only 1b)Only 2c)Both 1 and 2d)Either 1 or 2Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.