Question Description
Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Theorists are divided concerning the origin of the Moon. Some hypothesize that the Moon was formed in the same way as were the planets in the inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth)—from planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula. But, unlike the cores of the inner planets, the Moon’s core contains little or no iron, while the typical planet-forming materials were quite rich in iron. Other theorists propose that the Moon was ripped out of the Earth’s rocky mantle by the Earth’s collision with another large celestial body after much of the Earth’s iron fell to its core. One problem with the collision hypothesis is the question of how a satelliteformed in this way could have settled into the nearly circular orbit that the Moon has today. Fortunately, the collision hypothesis is testable. If it is true, the mantle rocks of the Moon and the Earth should be the same geochemically.Q.The primary purpose of the passageis toa)present two hypotheses concerning the origin of the Moonb)discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the collision hypothesis concerning the origin of the Moonc)propose that hypotheses concerning the Moon’s origin be testedd)argue that the Moon could not have been formed out of the typical planet-forming materials of the presolar nebulaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Theorists are divided concerning the origin of the Moon. Some hypothesize that the Moon was formed in the same way as were the planets in the inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth)—from planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula. But, unlike the cores of the inner planets, the Moon’s core contains little or no iron, while the typical planet-forming materials were quite rich in iron. Other theorists propose that the Moon was ripped out of the Earth’s rocky mantle by the Earth’s collision with another large celestial body after much of the Earth’s iron fell to its core. One problem with the collision hypothesis is the question of how a satelliteformed in this way could have settled into the nearly circular orbit that the Moon has today. Fortunately, the collision hypothesis is testable. If it is true, the mantle rocks of the Moon and the Earth should be the same geochemically.Q.The primary purpose of the passageis toa)present two hypotheses concerning the origin of the Moonb)discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the collision hypothesis concerning the origin of the Moonc)propose that hypotheses concerning the Moon’s origin be testedd)argue that the Moon could not have been formed out of the typical planet-forming materials of the presolar nebulaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Theorists are divided concerning the origin of the Moon. Some hypothesize that the Moon was formed in the same way as were the planets in the inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth)—from planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula. But, unlike the cores of the inner planets, the Moon’s core contains little or no iron, while the typical planet-forming materials were quite rich in iron. Other theorists propose that the Moon was ripped out of the Earth’s rocky mantle by the Earth’s collision with another large celestial body after much of the Earth’s iron fell to its core. One problem with the collision hypothesis is the question of how a satelliteformed in this way could have settled into the nearly circular orbit that the Moon has today. Fortunately, the collision hypothesis is testable. If it is true, the mantle rocks of the Moon and the Earth should be the same geochemically.Q.The primary purpose of the passageis toa)present two hypotheses concerning the origin of the Moonb)discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the collision hypothesis concerning the origin of the Moonc)propose that hypotheses concerning the Moon’s origin be testedd)argue that the Moon could not have been formed out of the typical planet-forming materials of the presolar nebulaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Theorists are divided concerning the origin of the Moon. Some hypothesize that the Moon was formed in the same way as were the planets in the inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth)—from planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula. But, unlike the cores of the inner planets, the Moon’s core contains little or no iron, while the typical planet-forming materials were quite rich in iron. Other theorists propose that the Moon was ripped out of the Earth’s rocky mantle by the Earth’s collision with another large celestial body after much of the Earth’s iron fell to its core. One problem with the collision hypothesis is the question of how a satelliteformed in this way could have settled into the nearly circular orbit that the Moon has today. Fortunately, the collision hypothesis is testable. If it is true, the mantle rocks of the Moon and the Earth should be the same geochemically.Q.The primary purpose of the passageis toa)present two hypotheses concerning the origin of the Moonb)discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the collision hypothesis concerning the origin of the Moonc)propose that hypotheses concerning the Moon’s origin be testedd)argue that the Moon could not have been formed out of the typical planet-forming materials of the presolar nebulaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Theorists are divided concerning the origin of the Moon. Some hypothesize that the Moon was formed in the same way as were the planets in the inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth)—from planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula. But, unlike the cores of the inner planets, the Moon’s core contains little or no iron, while the typical planet-forming materials were quite rich in iron. Other theorists propose that the Moon was ripped out of the Earth’s rocky mantle by the Earth’s collision with another large celestial body after much of the Earth’s iron fell to its core. One problem with the collision hypothesis is the question of how a satelliteformed in this way could have settled into the nearly circular orbit that the Moon has today. Fortunately, the collision hypothesis is testable. If it is true, the mantle rocks of the Moon and the Earth should be the same geochemically.Q.The primary purpose of the passageis toa)present two hypotheses concerning the origin of the Moonb)discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the collision hypothesis concerning the origin of the Moonc)propose that hypotheses concerning the Moon’s origin be testedd)argue that the Moon could not have been formed out of the typical planet-forming materials of the presolar nebulaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Theorists are divided concerning the origin of the Moon. Some hypothesize that the Moon was formed in the same way as were the planets in the inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth)—from planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula. But, unlike the cores of the inner planets, the Moon’s core contains little or no iron, while the typical planet-forming materials were quite rich in iron. Other theorists propose that the Moon was ripped out of the Earth’s rocky mantle by the Earth’s collision with another large celestial body after much of the Earth’s iron fell to its core. One problem with the collision hypothesis is the question of how a satelliteformed in this way could have settled into the nearly circular orbit that the Moon has today. Fortunately, the collision hypothesis is testable. If it is true, the mantle rocks of the Moon and the Earth should be the same geochemically.Q.The primary purpose of the passageis toa)present two hypotheses concerning the origin of the Moonb)discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the collision hypothesis concerning the origin of the Moonc)propose that hypotheses concerning the Moon’s origin be testedd)argue that the Moon could not have been formed out of the typical planet-forming materials of the presolar nebulaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Theorists are divided concerning the origin of the Moon. Some hypothesize that the Moon was formed in the same way as were the planets in the inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth)—from planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula. But, unlike the cores of the inner planets, the Moon’s core contains little or no iron, while the typical planet-forming materials were quite rich in iron. Other theorists propose that the Moon was ripped out of the Earth’s rocky mantle by the Earth’s collision with another large celestial body after much of the Earth’s iron fell to its core. One problem with the collision hypothesis is the question of how a satelliteformed in this way could have settled into the nearly circular orbit that the Moon has today. Fortunately, the collision hypothesis is testable. If it is true, the mantle rocks of the Moon and the Earth should be the same geochemically.Q.The primary purpose of the passageis toa)present two hypotheses concerning the origin of the Moonb)discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the collision hypothesis concerning the origin of the Moonc)propose that hypotheses concerning the Moon’s origin be testedd)argue that the Moon could not have been formed out of the typical planet-forming materials of the presolar nebulaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Theorists are divided concerning the origin of the Moon. Some hypothesize that the Moon was formed in the same way as were the planets in the inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth)—from planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula. But, unlike the cores of the inner planets, the Moon’s core contains little or no iron, while the typical planet-forming materials were quite rich in iron. Other theorists propose that the Moon was ripped out of the Earth’s rocky mantle by the Earth’s collision with another large celestial body after much of the Earth’s iron fell to its core. One problem with the collision hypothesis is the question of how a satelliteformed in this way could have settled into the nearly circular orbit that the Moon has today. Fortunately, the collision hypothesis is testable. If it is true, the mantle rocks of the Moon and the Earth should be the same geochemically.Q.The primary purpose of the passageis toa)present two hypotheses concerning the origin of the Moonb)discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the collision hypothesis concerning the origin of the Moonc)propose that hypotheses concerning the Moon’s origin be testedd)argue that the Moon could not have been formed out of the typical planet-forming materials of the presolar nebulaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.Theorists are divided concerning the origin of the Moon. Some hypothesize that the Moon was formed in the same way as were the planets in the inner solar system (Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Earth)—from planet-forming materials in the presolar nebula. But, unlike the cores of the inner planets, the Moon’s core contains little or no iron, while the typical planet-forming materials were quite rich in iron. Other theorists propose that the Moon was ripped out of the Earth’s rocky mantle by the Earth’s collision with another large celestial body after much of the Earth’s iron fell to its core. One problem with the collision hypothesis is the question of how a satelliteformed in this way could have settled into the nearly circular orbit that the Moon has today. Fortunately, the collision hypothesis is testable. If it is true, the mantle rocks of the Moon and the Earth should be the same geochemically.Q.The primary purpose of the passageis toa)present two hypotheses concerning the origin of the Moonb)discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the collision hypothesis concerning the origin of the Moonc)propose that hypotheses concerning the Moon’s origin be testedd)argue that the Moon could not have been formed out of the typical planet-forming materials of the presolar nebulaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.