Question Description
Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.It could well be said that the principle that is most foundational to correct ecological thinking is homeostasis. Homeostasis can best be defined as a model for all ecological activity, in terms of how a species interacts with its environment. Not discussing here, the complex origins and scientific validity of the term, it can simply be described as the principle of non-interference by a species, into its environment. Almost all species as observed by humans are in adherence to this principle, and it is humans who are most prominently responsible for its violation.This understanding of homeostasis, academically, gives us an axiom to place anthropogenic activities and their consequences. The logical question that follows from this is, how far human activity, even if disastrous for human life, can be accounted as a natural activity, and what standards do we adopt to demarcate artificial or unnatural actions of humans from the natural actions of humans? The best test for this demarcation is the harm that humans inflict not on its own kind, but on other species co-habiting the ecosystem. Only thus can we truly arrive at ecology as a scientific category, which is not confounded with sociology, politics, economics and other human sciences.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a valid assumption about the human activity?a)All human activities are a part of natureb)No human activity is a part of naturec)Some human activities are a part of natured)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.It could well be said that the principle that is most foundational to correct ecological thinking is homeostasis. Homeostasis can best be defined as a model for all ecological activity, in terms of how a species interacts with its environment. Not discussing here, the complex origins and scientific validity of the term, it can simply be described as the principle of non-interference by a species, into its environment. Almost all species as observed by humans are in adherence to this principle, and it is humans who are most prominently responsible for its violation.This understanding of homeostasis, academically, gives us an axiom to place anthropogenic activities and their consequences. The logical question that follows from this is, how far human activity, even if disastrous for human life, can be accounted as a natural activity, and what standards do we adopt to demarcate artificial or unnatural actions of humans from the natural actions of humans? The best test for this demarcation is the harm that humans inflict not on its own kind, but on other species co-habiting the ecosystem. Only thus can we truly arrive at ecology as a scientific category, which is not confounded with sociology, politics, economics and other human sciences.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a valid assumption about the human activity?a)All human activities are a part of natureb)No human activity is a part of naturec)Some human activities are a part of natured)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.It could well be said that the principle that is most foundational to correct ecological thinking is homeostasis. Homeostasis can best be defined as a model for all ecological activity, in terms of how a species interacts with its environment. Not discussing here, the complex origins and scientific validity of the term, it can simply be described as the principle of non-interference by a species, into its environment. Almost all species as observed by humans are in adherence to this principle, and it is humans who are most prominently responsible for its violation.This understanding of homeostasis, academically, gives us an axiom to place anthropogenic activities and their consequences. The logical question that follows from this is, how far human activity, even if disastrous for human life, can be accounted as a natural activity, and what standards do we adopt to demarcate artificial or unnatural actions of humans from the natural actions of humans? The best test for this demarcation is the harm that humans inflict not on its own kind, but on other species co-habiting the ecosystem. Only thus can we truly arrive at ecology as a scientific category, which is not confounded with sociology, politics, economics and other human sciences.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a valid assumption about the human activity?a)All human activities are a part of natureb)No human activity is a part of naturec)Some human activities are a part of natured)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.It could well be said that the principle that is most foundational to correct ecological thinking is homeostasis. Homeostasis can best be defined as a model for all ecological activity, in terms of how a species interacts with its environment. Not discussing here, the complex origins and scientific validity of the term, it can simply be described as the principle of non-interference by a species, into its environment. Almost all species as observed by humans are in adherence to this principle, and it is humans who are most prominently responsible for its violation.This understanding of homeostasis, academically, gives us an axiom to place anthropogenic activities and their consequences. The logical question that follows from this is, how far human activity, even if disastrous for human life, can be accounted as a natural activity, and what standards do we adopt to demarcate artificial or unnatural actions of humans from the natural actions of humans? The best test for this demarcation is the harm that humans inflict not on its own kind, but on other species co-habiting the ecosystem. Only thus can we truly arrive at ecology as a scientific category, which is not confounded with sociology, politics, economics and other human sciences.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a valid assumption about the human activity?a)All human activities are a part of natureb)No human activity is a part of naturec)Some human activities are a part of natured)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.It could well be said that the principle that is most foundational to correct ecological thinking is homeostasis. Homeostasis can best be defined as a model for all ecological activity, in terms of how a species interacts with its environment. Not discussing here, the complex origins and scientific validity of the term, it can simply be described as the principle of non-interference by a species, into its environment. Almost all species as observed by humans are in adherence to this principle, and it is humans who are most prominently responsible for its violation.This understanding of homeostasis, academically, gives us an axiom to place anthropogenic activities and their consequences. The logical question that follows from this is, how far human activity, even if disastrous for human life, can be accounted as a natural activity, and what standards do we adopt to demarcate artificial or unnatural actions of humans from the natural actions of humans? The best test for this demarcation is the harm that humans inflict not on its own kind, but on other species co-habiting the ecosystem. Only thus can we truly arrive at ecology as a scientific category, which is not confounded with sociology, politics, economics and other human sciences.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a valid assumption about the human activity?a)All human activities are a part of natureb)No human activity is a part of naturec)Some human activities are a part of natured)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.It could well be said that the principle that is most foundational to correct ecological thinking is homeostasis. Homeostasis can best be defined as a model for all ecological activity, in terms of how a species interacts with its environment. Not discussing here, the complex origins and scientific validity of the term, it can simply be described as the principle of non-interference by a species, into its environment. Almost all species as observed by humans are in adherence to this principle, and it is humans who are most prominently responsible for its violation.This understanding of homeostasis, academically, gives us an axiom to place anthropogenic activities and their consequences. The logical question that follows from this is, how far human activity, even if disastrous for human life, can be accounted as a natural activity, and what standards do we adopt to demarcate artificial or unnatural actions of humans from the natural actions of humans? The best test for this demarcation is the harm that humans inflict not on its own kind, but on other species co-habiting the ecosystem. Only thus can we truly arrive at ecology as a scientific category, which is not confounded with sociology, politics, economics and other human sciences.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a valid assumption about the human activity?a)All human activities are a part of natureb)No human activity is a part of naturec)Some human activities are a part of natured)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.It could well be said that the principle that is most foundational to correct ecological thinking is homeostasis. Homeostasis can best be defined as a model for all ecological activity, in terms of how a species interacts with its environment. Not discussing here, the complex origins and scientific validity of the term, it can simply be described as the principle of non-interference by a species, into its environment. Almost all species as observed by humans are in adherence to this principle, and it is humans who are most prominently responsible for its violation.This understanding of homeostasis, academically, gives us an axiom to place anthropogenic activities and their consequences. The logical question that follows from this is, how far human activity, even if disastrous for human life, can be accounted as a natural activity, and what standards do we adopt to demarcate artificial or unnatural actions of humans from the natural actions of humans? The best test for this demarcation is the harm that humans inflict not on its own kind, but on other species co-habiting the ecosystem. Only thus can we truly arrive at ecology as a scientific category, which is not confounded with sociology, politics, economics and other human sciences.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a valid assumption about the human activity?a)All human activities are a part of natureb)No human activity is a part of naturec)Some human activities are a part of natured)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.It could well be said that the principle that is most foundational to correct ecological thinking is homeostasis. Homeostasis can best be defined as a model for all ecological activity, in terms of how a species interacts with its environment. Not discussing here, the complex origins and scientific validity of the term, it can simply be described as the principle of non-interference by a species, into its environment. Almost all species as observed by humans are in adherence to this principle, and it is humans who are most prominently responsible for its violation.This understanding of homeostasis, academically, gives us an axiom to place anthropogenic activities and their consequences. The logical question that follows from this is, how far human activity, even if disastrous for human life, can be accounted as a natural activity, and what standards do we adopt to demarcate artificial or unnatural actions of humans from the natural actions of humans? The best test for this demarcation is the harm that humans inflict not on its own kind, but on other species co-habiting the ecosystem. Only thus can we truly arrive at ecology as a scientific category, which is not confounded with sociology, politics, economics and other human sciences.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a valid assumption about the human activity?a)All human activities are a part of natureb)No human activity is a part of naturec)Some human activities are a part of natured)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the information given below carefully and answer the following question.It could well be said that the principle that is most foundational to correct ecological thinking is homeostasis. Homeostasis can best be defined as a model for all ecological activity, in terms of how a species interacts with its environment. Not discussing here, the complex origins and scientific validity of the term, it can simply be described as the principle of non-interference by a species, into its environment. Almost all species as observed by humans are in adherence to this principle, and it is humans who are most prominently responsible for its violation.This understanding of homeostasis, academically, gives us an axiom to place anthropogenic activities and their consequences. The logical question that follows from this is, how far human activity, even if disastrous for human life, can be accounted as a natural activity, and what standards do we adopt to demarcate artificial or unnatural actions of humans from the natural actions of humans? The best test for this demarcation is the harm that humans inflict not on its own kind, but on other species co-habiting the ecosystem. Only thus can we truly arrive at ecology as a scientific category, which is not confounded with sociology, politics, economics and other human sciences.Q.According to the passage, which of the following is a valid assumption about the human activity?a)All human activities are a part of natureb)No human activity is a part of naturec)Some human activities are a part of natured)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.