Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Democracy exists in India; the Government is ...

Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,

a)
One should cast vote in elections.
b)
One must be prompt in paying taxes.
c)
One must be good to himself and to the society.
d)
None of the above.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected repres...

Democracy is a government of the people, for the people and by the people...people cast their votes to elect their representatives inorder to run the country...

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: Important Constitutional Bodies
15 Ques | 10 Min

Start Free Test

View all free CLAT tests

Community Answer

Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected repres...

Explanation:
The statement "Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people" emphasizes the importance of democratic processes in India's governance. Among the given options, A best supports this system:

One should cast vote in elections:
- Voting is a fundamental right and responsibility of citizens in a democracy.
- By casting a vote, citizens participate in the decision-making process and elect representatives who will work for their interests.
- Voting ensures that the government is accountable to the people and represents their needs and desires.

While options B and C are important aspects of being a good citizen, they are not directly related to the functioning of the democratic system. Therefore, the best answer is A.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

There is considerable controversy over the role of the governor. The governors under the Government of India Act 1935 were by the Raj, of the Raj and for the Raj. The constituent assembly wanted elected governors as proposed by a sub-committee of B.G. Kher, K.N. Katju and P. Subbarayan. Ironically, Katju was later appointed governor of West Bengal, even though he clearly took the view that the office should be apolitical. The draft constitution of 1948 was ambivalent – the drafting committee leaving it to the constituent assembly to decide whether governors should be elected or nominated.Babasaheb Ambedkar contradicted himself in saying that the governor would be just a symbol and also have discretionary powers. On May 30-31, 1949, Brijeshwar Prasad moved an amendment that the governor be appointed by the president. K.M. Munshi supported the proposal and Nehru intervened to say that “in the present context of the constitution, [it] was not only desirable from a practical point of view but from a democratic point of view too, it was worthwhile and desirable”. In the end, Ambedkar settled the debate by saying that the governor’s powers would be circumscribed by the constitution and statute. Tactically, he left it to the constituent assembly, knowing that the amendment would be carried.Clearly, his optimistic assumption that governors would be bound in their discretion was way off the mark. The various speeches on the governor by independent members expressing concern about the governor’s powers and fearing he or she would become an agent of the Centre were more on target.We have to find a new method of appointing governors. Consultation with the state government may not be enough. Many state governments may be supportive of the government in power in Delhi. All designated governors should be summoned before the Rajya Sabha for confirmation. It does not matter if the ruling party has a majority in the house. Each governor will be thoroughly interrogated, investigated and judged on suitability. Such a procedure should be inserted by amendment.Elections are India’s greatest strength. The electorate speaks with perception, mood swings influenced by canvassing and sees to its own interest. But the cause of elections perishes if governors and union ministers behave, in Kipling’s phrase, “as bandar log without the law”. Today, governors are guilty of immense political corruption violating constitutional principles. They have demonstrated no concern for democracy or democratic principles or the importance of a people’s mandate. The issue this raises, beyond that of who became chief minister, is how governors ought to be selected. Principles emerge from good practices not bad ones. Good principles recognise constitutionalism and democracy.Q.The Constituent Assembly agreed to what method for selection of the Governor?

View answer

Tamil Nadu government delayed holding rural local body elections, due in 2016, by three years. On the question of inclusiveness, in February 2016, a few months before the notification for local body elections was put forward, the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly unanimously passed the much needed bill that accorded 50% reservation to women in the local bodies, raising the quota from 33%. Moreover, reservations are in place for the depressed castes. A delay, therefore, has social justice ramifications too, a principle central to the sociopolitical history of Tamil Nadu.As introduced by 73rdand 74thamendment of constitution, Local body elections serve as a means to both strengthen political parties’ organisational structures and in enabling them to stay closely connected with the voters. The numerous opportunities in terms of official posts that open up through local body elections serve as an opportunity for political parties to give a chance to party workers from multiple backgrounds to partake in government functioning. Narendra Subramanian, a Professor of Political Science at McGill University, argues that such broad based accommodation results in ‘organisational pluralism’, wherein, with intraparty pluralism, a given party’s engagement with society changes its orientation towards an atmosphere of tolerance. Put otherwise, in a diverse society like Tamil Nadu, one can argue that the presence of local bodies serves as a means to usher in societal syncretism through bro ad based representation. On another note, local bodies provide opportunities for the emergence of leaders at the local level outside of political parties as well.On the aspect of parties’ organizational structures, it would not be surprising to note the relatively higher enthusiasm shown by the Dravidian parties, i.e., the DMK and the AIADMK (the patent differences between the two parties notwithstanding), more than the smaller parties like the Makkal Needhi Maiam, which decided to not participate in the impending elections. The enthusiasm to partake in the local body elections among the Dravidian parties is not extensive, however, owing to the timing of the elections, with the Assembly elections due to be held in early 2021. The resources that elections of late warrant and the fatigue stemming out of fighting elections continually since 2016, especially in the backdrop of stiff competition between the Dravidian parties and the competition posed by the smaller parties, are factors that one cannot overlook. That said, given the benefits accruing from partaking in the elections, it is not surprising that the Dravidian parties are not stepping away from participation.Taking stock of the multifarious benefits stemming out of the existence and functioning of local bodies to all the stakeholders involved, the need for sterner fixing of accountability and instituting checks in the system to avoid any delays in the time ahead is only more urgent.Q.Suppose the law provided government laxity to not conduct local body election at places where there is ongoing naxal movement or any other separatist movement. As far as the above paragraph is concerend would the government be then justified to not conduct election?

View answer

There is considerable controversy over the role of the governor. The governors under the Government of India Act 1935 were by the Raj, of the Raj and for the Raj. The constituent assembly wanted elected governors as proposed by a sub-committee of B.G. Kher, K.N. Katju and P. Subbarayan. Ironically, Katju was later appointed governor of West Bengal, even though he clearly took the view that the office should be apolitical. The draft constitution of 1948 was ambivalent – the drafting committee leaving it to the constituent assembly to decide whether governors should be elected or nominated.Babasaheb Ambedkar contradicted himself in saying that the governor would be just a symbol and also have discretionary powers. On May 30-31, 1949, Brijeshwar Prasad moved an amendment that the governor be appointed by the president. K.M. Munshi supported the proposal and Nehru intervened to say that “in the present context of the constitution, [it] was not only desirable from a practical point of view but from a democratic point of view too, it was worthwhile and desirable”. In the end, Ambedkar settled the debate by saying that the governor’s powers would be circumscribed by the constitution and statute. Tactically, he left it to the constituent assembly, knowing that the amendment would be carried.Clearly, his optimistic assumption that governors would be bound in their discretion was way off the mark. The various speeches on the governor by independent members expressing concern about the governor’s powers and fearing he or she would become an agent of the Centre were more on target.We have to find a new method of appointing governors. Consultation with the state government may not be enough. Many state governments may be supportive of the government in power in Delhi. All designated governors should be summoned before the Rajya Sabha for confirmation. It does not matter if the ruling party has a majority in the house. Each governor will be thoroughly interrogated, investigated and judged on suitability. Such a procedure should be inserted by amendment.Elections are India’s greatest strength. The electorate speaks with perception, mood swings influenced by canvassing and sees to its own interest. But the cause of elections perishes if governors and union ministers behave, in Kipling’s phrase, “as bandar log without the law”. Today, governors are guilty of immense political corruption violating constitutional principles. They have demonstrated no concern for democracy or democratic principles or the importance of a people’s mandate. The issue this raises, beyond that of who became chief minister, is how governors ought to be selected. Principles emerge from good practices not bad ones. Good principles recognise constitutionalism and democracy.Q.What fear of the author has become true in practice of role played by Governors?

View answer

There is considerable controversy over the role of the governor. The governors under the Government of India Act 1935 were by the Raj, of the Raj and for the Raj. The constituent assembly wanted elected governors as proposed by a sub-committee of B.G. Kher, K.N. Katju and P. Subbarayan. Ironically, Katju was later appointed governor of West Bengal, even though he clearly took the view that the office should be apolitical. The draft constitution of 1948 was ambivalent – the drafting committee leaving it to the constituent assembly to decide whether governors should be elected or nominated.Babasaheb Ambedkar contradicted himself in saying that the governor would be just a symbol and also have discretionary powers. On May 30-31, 1949, Brijeshwar Prasad moved an amendment that the governor be appointed by the president. K.M. Munshi supported the proposal and Nehru intervened to say that “in the present context of the constitution, [it] was not only desirable from a practical point of view but from a democratic point of view too, it was worthwhile and desirable”. In the end, Ambedkar settled the debate by saying that the governor’s powers would be circumscribed by the constitution and statute. Tactically, he left it to the constituent assembly, knowing that the amendment would be carried.Clearly, his optimistic assumption that governors would be bound in their discretion was way off the mark. The various speeches on the governor by independent members expressing concern about the governor’s powers and fearing he or she would become an agent of the Centre were more on target.We have to find a new method of appointing governors. Consultation with the state government may not be enough. Many state governments may be supportive of the government in power in Delhi. All designated governors should be summoned before the Rajya Sabha for confirmation. It does not matter if the ruling party has a majority in the house. Each governor will be thoroughly interrogated, investigated and judged on suitability. Such a procedure should be inserted by amendment.Elections are India’s greatest strength. The electorate speaks with perception, mood swings influenced by canvassing and sees to its own interest. But the cause of elections perishes if governors and union ministers behave, in Kipling’s phrase, “as bandar log without the law”. Today, governors are guilty of immense political corruption violating constitutional principles. They have demonstrated no concern for democracy or democratic principles or the importance of a people’s mandate. The issue this raises, beyond that of who became chief minister, is how governors ought to be selected. Principles emerge from good practices not bad ones. Good principles recognise constitutionalism and democracy.Q.The author proposes a change in the method of appointment of Governors to protect democracy, what is the new process being proposed by him?

View answer

There is considerable controversy over the role of the governor. The governors under the Government of India Act 1935 were by the Raj, of the Raj and for the Raj. The constituent assembly wanted elected governors as proposed by a sub-committee of B.G. Kher, K.N. Katju and P. Subbarayan. Ironically, Katju was later appointed governor of West Bengal, even though he clearly took the view that the office should be apolitical. The draft constitution of 1948 was ambivalent – the drafting committee leaving it to the constituent assembly to decide whether governors should be elected or nominated.Babasaheb Ambedkar contradicted himself in saying that the governor would be just a symbol and also have discretionary powers. On May 30-31, 1949, Brijeshwar Prasad moved an amendment that the governor be appointed by the president. K.M. Munshi supported the proposal and Nehru intervened to say that “in the present context of the constitution, [it] was not only desirable from a practical point of view but from a democratic point of view too, it was worthwhile and desirable”. In the end, Ambedkar settled the debate by saying that the governor’s powers would be circumscribed by the constitution and statute. Tactically, he left it to the constituent assembly, knowing that the amendment would be carried.Clearly, his optimistic assumption that governors would be bound in their discretion was way off the mark. The various speeches on the governor by independent members expressing concern about the governor’s powers and fearing he or she would become an agent of the Centre were more on target.We have to find a new method of appointing governors. Consultation with the state government may not be enough. Many state governments may be supportive of the government in power in Delhi. All designated governors should be summoned before the Rajya Sabha for confirmation. It does not matter if the ruling party has a majority in the house. Each governor will be thoroughly interrogated, investigated and judged on suitability. Such a procedure should be inserted by amendment.Elections are India’s greatest strength. The electorate speaks with perception, mood swings influenced by canvassing and sees to its own interest. But the cause of elections perishes if governors and union ministers behave, in Kipling’s phrase, “as bandar log without the law”. Today, governors are guilty of immense political corruption violating constitutional principles. They have demonstrated no concern for democracy or democratic principles or the importance of a people’s mandate. The issue this raises, beyond that of who became chief minister, is how governors ought to be selected. Principles emerge from good practices not bad ones. Good principles recognise constitutionalism and democracy.Q.The author states that Ambedkar contradicted himself, which statement correctly states that contradiction?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Democracy exists in India; the Government is run by the elected representatives of the people. For the proper functioning of this system,a)One should cast vote in elections.b)One must be prompt in paying taxes.c)One must be good to himself and to the society.d)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam