Question Description
Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following further strengthens the argument in favour of a new policy to preserve forests?a)The proposal for implementation of a new national forest policy has already been laid down in the Parliament.b)The revised National Forest Policy aims to maintain at least one-third of Indias total land area under forest and tree cover.c)Lack of a concrete policy in place has given way to developers and industrialists to exploit the forests to meet their own ends.d)The basic objective that governed the National Forest Policy of 1988 was maintenance of environmental stability through preservation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following further strengthens the argument in favour of a new policy to preserve forests?a)The proposal for implementation of a new national forest policy has already been laid down in the Parliament.b)The revised National Forest Policy aims to maintain at least one-third of Indias total land area under forest and tree cover.c)Lack of a concrete policy in place has given way to developers and industrialists to exploit the forests to meet their own ends.d)The basic objective that governed the National Forest Policy of 1988 was maintenance of environmental stability through preservation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following further strengthens the argument in favour of a new policy to preserve forests?a)The proposal for implementation of a new national forest policy has already been laid down in the Parliament.b)The revised National Forest Policy aims to maintain at least one-third of Indias total land area under forest and tree cover.c)Lack of a concrete policy in place has given way to developers and industrialists to exploit the forests to meet their own ends.d)The basic objective that governed the National Forest Policy of 1988 was maintenance of environmental stability through preservation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following further strengthens the argument in favour of a new policy to preserve forests?a)The proposal for implementation of a new national forest policy has already been laid down in the Parliament.b)The revised National Forest Policy aims to maintain at least one-third of Indias total land area under forest and tree cover.c)Lack of a concrete policy in place has given way to developers and industrialists to exploit the forests to meet their own ends.d)The basic objective that governed the National Forest Policy of 1988 was maintenance of environmental stability through preservation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following further strengthens the argument in favour of a new policy to preserve forests?a)The proposal for implementation of a new national forest policy has already been laid down in the Parliament.b)The revised National Forest Policy aims to maintain at least one-third of Indias total land area under forest and tree cover.c)Lack of a concrete policy in place has given way to developers and industrialists to exploit the forests to meet their own ends.d)The basic objective that governed the National Forest Policy of 1988 was maintenance of environmental stability through preservation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following further strengthens the argument in favour of a new policy to preserve forests?a)The proposal for implementation of a new national forest policy has already been laid down in the Parliament.b)The revised National Forest Policy aims to maintain at least one-third of Indias total land area under forest and tree cover.c)Lack of a concrete policy in place has given way to developers and industrialists to exploit the forests to meet their own ends.d)The basic objective that governed the National Forest Policy of 1988 was maintenance of environmental stability through preservation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following further strengthens the argument in favour of a new policy to preserve forests?a)The proposal for implementation of a new national forest policy has already been laid down in the Parliament.b)The revised National Forest Policy aims to maintain at least one-third of Indias total land area under forest and tree cover.c)Lack of a concrete policy in place has given way to developers and industrialists to exploit the forests to meet their own ends.d)The basic objective that governed the National Forest Policy of 1988 was maintenance of environmental stability through preservation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following further strengthens the argument in favour of a new policy to preserve forests?a)The proposal for implementation of a new national forest policy has already been laid down in the Parliament.b)The revised National Forest Policy aims to maintain at least one-third of Indias total land area under forest and tree cover.c)Lack of a concrete policy in place has given way to developers and industrialists to exploit the forests to meet their own ends.d)The basic objective that governed the National Forest Policy of 1988 was maintenance of environmental stability through preservation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the context and answer the following question.The Union ministry of environment, forest, and climate change, whose mandate is to preserve Indias stressed natural wealth, has sought a reassessment of the sustainable mining plan for Saranda and Chaibasa forests in Jharkhands Singhum district. Critics suspect this is to facilitate mining. The Saranda forests are Indias largest, contiguous Sal forests spread over 82,000 hectares (ha). Other than being a rich biodiverse forest and a huge carbon sink, Saranda is home to a large number of animal, bird and reptile species. However, due to indiscriminate mining, Saranda has lost several plant and animal species. One key reason why forests areas of the country, which are also mineral-rich, face such threats of destruction is because India, while it pursues its goal of having 33% of its land under forest cover, is yet to have a new national forest policy. This policy can define a "forest", mark out the inviolate areas, and chart out a proper forest management system. The current National Forest Policy dates back to 1988, and cannot meet current challenges, where the trade-off between economic growth and infrastructure on the one hand, and safeguarding critical natural resources on the other, has only intensified. Additionally, along with assessing the value of minerals in Saranda-type forest areas, the Indian State must also measure the financial worth of the ecosystem services that a forest provides. Instead of looking for ways to facilitate mining, the ministry should focus on designing the new policy framework to protect forests.Q.Which of the following further strengthens the argument in favour of a new policy to preserve forests?a)The proposal for implementation of a new national forest policy has already been laid down in the Parliament.b)The revised National Forest Policy aims to maintain at least one-third of Indias total land area under forest and tree cover.c)Lack of a concrete policy in place has given way to developers and industrialists to exploit the forests to meet their own ends.d)The basic objective that governed the National Forest Policy of 1988 was maintenance of environmental stability through preservation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.