Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanviandrsquo;s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jah...

Join the Discussion on the App

Facts: Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.

Principle: Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.

a)
Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.
b)
Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.
c)
Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.
d)
Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Practice Test for AILET - 5

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita...

C is the correct option. Every right has some limitation period to be exercised over the time. Here in this case Tanvi has crossed the reasonable time period for filing the suit and also Ashrita is not liable and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita...

's right over her property and space, and disturbs her peace and sleep each morning.

b)Ashrita may argue that she has been practicing Nitinnatyam for 25 years and it is a part of her cultural and religious tradition, and that Tanvi could use earplugs or shift to a different room. However, this argument may not hold as it is Ashrita's responsibility to ensure that her actions do not cause unreasonable interference to others, and she cannot expect others to adjust to her practices.

c)Tanvi may seek compensation for the mental and physical distress caused to her due to the constant disturbance, and may also seek an injunction to prevent Ashrita from playing loud music during early morning hours.

d)It is important for individuals to be mindful of their actions and their impact on others, and to respect their right to peaceful enjoyment of their property and space. In case of any disputes, it is advisable to try and resolve them amicably, and if necessary, seek legal recourse.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Attention CLAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practicing Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle: Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.

View answer

Facts: Jalebi Bai conducted Nitinnatyam lessons in her flat which was just above Chameli’s flat. Chameli suffered from migraine and the constant thud of people’s feet from the ceiling of her house gave her severe headaches. Chameli decided to sue Jalebi Bai for nuisance. Will she succeed?Principle: Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance

View answer

Instruction: This section consists of five problems in total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules : Problem 4A. Trespass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Trespass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts: Mr. A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them.Decide as per the questions.A had set up a tandoor in his house and the smoke from it use to go to B’s house. Can B sue A for trespass?

View answer

Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of 'private nuisance’.Fact: Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing a nuisance.

View answer

Instruction:This section consists of five problemsin total. Each problem consists of a set of rules and facts. Apply the specified rules to the set of facts and answer the questions.Rules :Problem 4A. Tresspass to land means interference with the possession of land without lawful justification.B. Tresspass could be committed either by a person himself entering the land of another or doing the same through some material object: stick, stones etc.C. When a person enters certain premises under the authority of some law and after having entered there abuses that authority by committing some wrongful act there, he will be considered a trespasser.D. Where there is justification to enter the premises it is no trespass.Facts:Mr A and B were neighbours in a locality but were not friendly with each other and there was always some fight going on between both of them. Decide as per the questions.A had setup a tandoor in his house and the smoke from it use to go to B’s house. Can B sue A for trespass?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Facts:Tanvi and Ashrita were residents of Jahnvi Devi Society. Ashrita has been into the habit of practising Nitinnatyam before sunrise each morning since the past 25 years. She plays loud dance beats in her music system each morning to help her practice. The loud noise emanating from her music system disturbs Tanvi who is woken up each morning due to the sound. After putting up with this for 25 years, Tanvi finally decides she can take it no more and decides to sue Ashrita for nuisance.Principle:Whoever causes unreasonable interference to the right of another over his property and space is causing nuisance.a)Ashrita is liable because her dance practice cause unreasonable interference with Tanvi’s sleep.b)Ashrita is liable because she could easily choose some other time of the day.c)Ashrita is not liable because she has been doing this for over 20 years, and has now acquired a prescriptive right to continue with it unchallenged.d)Ashrita is not liable because it is her wish as to what she wants to do inside her house.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam