Question Description
Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of 'private nuisance’.Fact: Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing a nuisance.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken the utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of 'private nuisance’.Fact: Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing a nuisance.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken the utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of 'private nuisance’.Fact: Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing a nuisance.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken the utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of 'private nuisance’.Fact: Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing a nuisance.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken the utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of 'private nuisance’.Fact: Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing a nuisance.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken the utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of 'private nuisance’.Fact: Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing a nuisance.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken the utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of 'private nuisance’.Fact: Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing a nuisance.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken the utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of 'private nuisance’.Fact: Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing a nuisance.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken the utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of 'private nuisance’.Fact: Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing a nuisance.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken the utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.