Question Description
Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Failure to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that may cause such injuries to neighbours as are reasonably foreseeable amounts to negligence.Facts: CLAT College, Delhi is located in a busy area with heavy traffic. The school timings are from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. At 3:00 p.m., the school authorities open the gates and all the students pour out, causing much confusion and inconvenience to others in the area. One day, the school closes at 3:00 p.m. as usual and the students come running out to take their respective buses home. An auto plying on the road at the same time, in order to avoid a running child, topples over. The auto driver sues the school for negligence.a)The auto driver is liable because he should not have taken the school road at the closing time.b)Only the auto driver is at fault; had he been more careful, the auto would not have toppled over.c)The school is not at fault since the auto driver is not a neighbour of the school.d)Only the school is at fault for not taking better care before letting the students out.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Failure to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that may cause such injuries to neighbours as are reasonably foreseeable amounts to negligence.Facts: CLAT College, Delhi is located in a busy area with heavy traffic. The school timings are from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. At 3:00 p.m., the school authorities open the gates and all the students pour out, causing much confusion and inconvenience to others in the area. One day, the school closes at 3:00 p.m. as usual and the students come running out to take their respective buses home. An auto plying on the road at the same time, in order to avoid a running child, topples over. The auto driver sues the school for negligence.a)The auto driver is liable because he should not have taken the school road at the closing time.b)Only the auto driver is at fault; had he been more careful, the auto would not have toppled over.c)The school is not at fault since the auto driver is not a neighbour of the school.d)Only the school is at fault for not taking better care before letting the students out.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Failure to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that may cause such injuries to neighbours as are reasonably foreseeable amounts to negligence.Facts: CLAT College, Delhi is located in a busy area with heavy traffic. The school timings are from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. At 3:00 p.m., the school authorities open the gates and all the students pour out, causing much confusion and inconvenience to others in the area. One day, the school closes at 3:00 p.m. as usual and the students come running out to take their respective buses home. An auto plying on the road at the same time, in order to avoid a running child, topples over. The auto driver sues the school for negligence.a)The auto driver is liable because he should not have taken the school road at the closing time.b)Only the auto driver is at fault; had he been more careful, the auto would not have toppled over.c)The school is not at fault since the auto driver is not a neighbour of the school.d)Only the school is at fault for not taking better care before letting the students out.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Failure to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that may cause such injuries to neighbours as are reasonably foreseeable amounts to negligence.Facts: CLAT College, Delhi is located in a busy area with heavy traffic. The school timings are from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. At 3:00 p.m., the school authorities open the gates and all the students pour out, causing much confusion and inconvenience to others in the area. One day, the school closes at 3:00 p.m. as usual and the students come running out to take their respective buses home. An auto plying on the road at the same time, in order to avoid a running child, topples over. The auto driver sues the school for negligence.a)The auto driver is liable because he should not have taken the school road at the closing time.b)Only the auto driver is at fault; had he been more careful, the auto would not have toppled over.c)The school is not at fault since the auto driver is not a neighbour of the school.d)Only the school is at fault for not taking better care before letting the students out.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Failure to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that may cause such injuries to neighbours as are reasonably foreseeable amounts to negligence.Facts: CLAT College, Delhi is located in a busy area with heavy traffic. The school timings are from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. At 3:00 p.m., the school authorities open the gates and all the students pour out, causing much confusion and inconvenience to others in the area. One day, the school closes at 3:00 p.m. as usual and the students come running out to take their respective buses home. An auto plying on the road at the same time, in order to avoid a running child, topples over. The auto driver sues the school for negligence.a)The auto driver is liable because he should not have taken the school road at the closing time.b)Only the auto driver is at fault; had he been more careful, the auto would not have toppled over.c)The school is not at fault since the auto driver is not a neighbour of the school.d)Only the school is at fault for not taking better care before letting the students out.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Failure to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that may cause such injuries to neighbours as are reasonably foreseeable amounts to negligence.Facts: CLAT College, Delhi is located in a busy area with heavy traffic. The school timings are from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. At 3:00 p.m., the school authorities open the gates and all the students pour out, causing much confusion and inconvenience to others in the area. One day, the school closes at 3:00 p.m. as usual and the students come running out to take their respective buses home. An auto plying on the road at the same time, in order to avoid a running child, topples over. The auto driver sues the school for negligence.a)The auto driver is liable because he should not have taken the school road at the closing time.b)Only the auto driver is at fault; had he been more careful, the auto would not have toppled over.c)The school is not at fault since the auto driver is not a neighbour of the school.d)Only the school is at fault for not taking better care before letting the students out.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Failure to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that may cause such injuries to neighbours as are reasonably foreseeable amounts to negligence.Facts: CLAT College, Delhi is located in a busy area with heavy traffic. The school timings are from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. At 3:00 p.m., the school authorities open the gates and all the students pour out, causing much confusion and inconvenience to others in the area. One day, the school closes at 3:00 p.m. as usual and the students come running out to take their respective buses home. An auto plying on the road at the same time, in order to avoid a running child, topples over. The auto driver sues the school for negligence.a)The auto driver is liable because he should not have taken the school road at the closing time.b)Only the auto driver is at fault; had he been more careful, the auto would not have toppled over.c)The school is not at fault since the auto driver is not a neighbour of the school.d)Only the school is at fault for not taking better care before letting the students out.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Failure to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that may cause such injuries to neighbours as are reasonably foreseeable amounts to negligence.Facts: CLAT College, Delhi is located in a busy area with heavy traffic. The school timings are from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. At 3:00 p.m., the school authorities open the gates and all the students pour out, causing much confusion and inconvenience to others in the area. One day, the school closes at 3:00 p.m. as usual and the students come running out to take their respective buses home. An auto plying on the road at the same time, in order to avoid a running child, topples over. The auto driver sues the school for negligence.a)The auto driver is liable because he should not have taken the school road at the closing time.b)Only the auto driver is at fault; had he been more careful, the auto would not have toppled over.c)The school is not at fault since the auto driver is not a neighbour of the school.d)Only the school is at fault for not taking better care before letting the students out.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Failure to take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that may cause such injuries to neighbours as are reasonably foreseeable amounts to negligence.Facts: CLAT College, Delhi is located in a busy area with heavy traffic. The school timings are from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. At 3:00 p.m., the school authorities open the gates and all the students pour out, causing much confusion and inconvenience to others in the area. One day, the school closes at 3:00 p.m. as usual and the students come running out to take their respective buses home. An auto plying on the road at the same time, in order to avoid a running child, topples over. The auto driver sues the school for negligence.a)The auto driver is liable because he should not have taken the school road at the closing time.b)Only the auto driver is at fault; had he been more careful, the auto would not have toppled over.c)The school is not at fault since the auto driver is not a neighbour of the school.d)Only the school is at fault for not taking better care before letting the students out.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.