Question Description
Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person who institutes a prosecution against another without any reasonable cause for the same, with a malicious intention, is guilty of the tort of malicious prosecution.Facts: Kishore and Arjun are arch-enemies. Once when Arjun's house is robbed, he lodges a criminal complaint reporting the same and in order to take revenge and cause harm to Kishore, says that Kishore is guilty of the same. The police arrest Kishore investigates the complaint and makes a report to the Magistrate stating that Kishore is not connected with the crime, which results in the Magistrate discharging Kishore. Kishore sues Arjun for the tort of malicious prosecution.a)Arjun is guilty because he made the complaint only to seek revenge against Kishore.b)Arjun is guilty because he did not check before complaining that Kishore was guilty of the theft.c)Arjun is not guilty because Kishore has not been prosecuted.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person who institutes a prosecution against another without any reasonable cause for the same, with a malicious intention, is guilty of the tort of malicious prosecution.Facts: Kishore and Arjun are arch-enemies. Once when Arjun's house is robbed, he lodges a criminal complaint reporting the same and in order to take revenge and cause harm to Kishore, says that Kishore is guilty of the same. The police arrest Kishore investigates the complaint and makes a report to the Magistrate stating that Kishore is not connected with the crime, which results in the Magistrate discharging Kishore. Kishore sues Arjun for the tort of malicious prosecution.a)Arjun is guilty because he made the complaint only to seek revenge against Kishore.b)Arjun is guilty because he did not check before complaining that Kishore was guilty of the theft.c)Arjun is not guilty because Kishore has not been prosecuted.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person who institutes a prosecution against another without any reasonable cause for the same, with a malicious intention, is guilty of the tort of malicious prosecution.Facts: Kishore and Arjun are arch-enemies. Once when Arjun's house is robbed, he lodges a criminal complaint reporting the same and in order to take revenge and cause harm to Kishore, says that Kishore is guilty of the same. The police arrest Kishore investigates the complaint and makes a report to the Magistrate stating that Kishore is not connected with the crime, which results in the Magistrate discharging Kishore. Kishore sues Arjun for the tort of malicious prosecution.a)Arjun is guilty because he made the complaint only to seek revenge against Kishore.b)Arjun is guilty because he did not check before complaining that Kishore was guilty of the theft.c)Arjun is not guilty because Kishore has not been prosecuted.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person who institutes a prosecution against another without any reasonable cause for the same, with a malicious intention, is guilty of the tort of malicious prosecution.Facts: Kishore and Arjun are arch-enemies. Once when Arjun's house is robbed, he lodges a criminal complaint reporting the same and in order to take revenge and cause harm to Kishore, says that Kishore is guilty of the same. The police arrest Kishore investigates the complaint and makes a report to the Magistrate stating that Kishore is not connected with the crime, which results in the Magistrate discharging Kishore. Kishore sues Arjun for the tort of malicious prosecution.a)Arjun is guilty because he made the complaint only to seek revenge against Kishore.b)Arjun is guilty because he did not check before complaining that Kishore was guilty of the theft.c)Arjun is not guilty because Kishore has not been prosecuted.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person who institutes a prosecution against another without any reasonable cause for the same, with a malicious intention, is guilty of the tort of malicious prosecution.Facts: Kishore and Arjun are arch-enemies. Once when Arjun's house is robbed, he lodges a criminal complaint reporting the same and in order to take revenge and cause harm to Kishore, says that Kishore is guilty of the same. The police arrest Kishore investigates the complaint and makes a report to the Magistrate stating that Kishore is not connected with the crime, which results in the Magistrate discharging Kishore. Kishore sues Arjun for the tort of malicious prosecution.a)Arjun is guilty because he made the complaint only to seek revenge against Kishore.b)Arjun is guilty because he did not check before complaining that Kishore was guilty of the theft.c)Arjun is not guilty because Kishore has not been prosecuted.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person who institutes a prosecution against another without any reasonable cause for the same, with a malicious intention, is guilty of the tort of malicious prosecution.Facts: Kishore and Arjun are arch-enemies. Once when Arjun's house is robbed, he lodges a criminal complaint reporting the same and in order to take revenge and cause harm to Kishore, says that Kishore is guilty of the same. The police arrest Kishore investigates the complaint and makes a report to the Magistrate stating that Kishore is not connected with the crime, which results in the Magistrate discharging Kishore. Kishore sues Arjun for the tort of malicious prosecution.a)Arjun is guilty because he made the complaint only to seek revenge against Kishore.b)Arjun is guilty because he did not check before complaining that Kishore was guilty of the theft.c)Arjun is not guilty because Kishore has not been prosecuted.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person who institutes a prosecution against another without any reasonable cause for the same, with a malicious intention, is guilty of the tort of malicious prosecution.Facts: Kishore and Arjun are arch-enemies. Once when Arjun's house is robbed, he lodges a criminal complaint reporting the same and in order to take revenge and cause harm to Kishore, says that Kishore is guilty of the same. The police arrest Kishore investigates the complaint and makes a report to the Magistrate stating that Kishore is not connected with the crime, which results in the Magistrate discharging Kishore. Kishore sues Arjun for the tort of malicious prosecution.a)Arjun is guilty because he made the complaint only to seek revenge against Kishore.b)Arjun is guilty because he did not check before complaining that Kishore was guilty of the theft.c)Arjun is not guilty because Kishore has not been prosecuted.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person who institutes a prosecution against another without any reasonable cause for the same, with a malicious intention, is guilty of the tort of malicious prosecution.Facts: Kishore and Arjun are arch-enemies. Once when Arjun's house is robbed, he lodges a criminal complaint reporting the same and in order to take revenge and cause harm to Kishore, says that Kishore is guilty of the same. The police arrest Kishore investigates the complaint and makes a report to the Magistrate stating that Kishore is not connected with the crime, which results in the Magistrate discharging Kishore. Kishore sues Arjun for the tort of malicious prosecution.a)Arjun is guilty because he made the complaint only to seek revenge against Kishore.b)Arjun is guilty because he did not check before complaining that Kishore was guilty of the theft.c)Arjun is not guilty because Kishore has not been prosecuted.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person who institutes a prosecution against another without any reasonable cause for the same, with a malicious intention, is guilty of the tort of malicious prosecution.Facts: Kishore and Arjun are arch-enemies. Once when Arjun's house is robbed, he lodges a criminal complaint reporting the same and in order to take revenge and cause harm to Kishore, says that Kishore is guilty of the same. The police arrest Kishore investigates the complaint and makes a report to the Magistrate stating that Kishore is not connected with the crime, which results in the Magistrate discharging Kishore. Kishore sues Arjun for the tort of malicious prosecution.a)Arjun is guilty because he made the complaint only to seek revenge against Kishore.b)Arjun is guilty because he did not check before complaining that Kishore was guilty of the theft.c)Arjun is not guilty because Kishore has not been prosecuted.d)None of the aboveCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.