Question Description
Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Father is liable for the acts of a son if he afforded him an opportunity to access the danger.Fact: Nasser has an airgun in his house that he keeps in an inaccessible area. One day in his absence, his 12-year-old son Syed contrives to get possession of the gun, starts playing with it and hurts his friend Daud. Daud, through his father, brings a tort action against Syed and Nasser.a)Both Nasser and Syed are liableb)Only Nasser is liablec)Only Syed is liabled)Daud does not have the capacity to initiate the actionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Father is liable for the acts of a son if he afforded him an opportunity to access the danger.Fact: Nasser has an airgun in his house that he keeps in an inaccessible area. One day in his absence, his 12-year-old son Syed contrives to get possession of the gun, starts playing with it and hurts his friend Daud. Daud, through his father, brings a tort action against Syed and Nasser.a)Both Nasser and Syed are liableb)Only Nasser is liablec)Only Syed is liabled)Daud does not have the capacity to initiate the actionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Father is liable for the acts of a son if he afforded him an opportunity to access the danger.Fact: Nasser has an airgun in his house that he keeps in an inaccessible area. One day in his absence, his 12-year-old son Syed contrives to get possession of the gun, starts playing with it and hurts his friend Daud. Daud, through his father, brings a tort action against Syed and Nasser.a)Both Nasser and Syed are liableb)Only Nasser is liablec)Only Syed is liabled)Daud does not have the capacity to initiate the actionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Father is liable for the acts of a son if he afforded him an opportunity to access the danger.Fact: Nasser has an airgun in his house that he keeps in an inaccessible area. One day in his absence, his 12-year-old son Syed contrives to get possession of the gun, starts playing with it and hurts his friend Daud. Daud, through his father, brings a tort action against Syed and Nasser.a)Both Nasser and Syed are liableb)Only Nasser is liablec)Only Syed is liabled)Daud does not have the capacity to initiate the actionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Father is liable for the acts of a son if he afforded him an opportunity to access the danger.Fact: Nasser has an airgun in his house that he keeps in an inaccessible area. One day in his absence, his 12-year-old son Syed contrives to get possession of the gun, starts playing with it and hurts his friend Daud. Daud, through his father, brings a tort action against Syed and Nasser.a)Both Nasser and Syed are liableb)Only Nasser is liablec)Only Syed is liabled)Daud does not have the capacity to initiate the actionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Father is liable for the acts of a son if he afforded him an opportunity to access the danger.Fact: Nasser has an airgun in his house that he keeps in an inaccessible area. One day in his absence, his 12-year-old son Syed contrives to get possession of the gun, starts playing with it and hurts his friend Daud. Daud, through his father, brings a tort action against Syed and Nasser.a)Both Nasser and Syed are liableb)Only Nasser is liablec)Only Syed is liabled)Daud does not have the capacity to initiate the actionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Father is liable for the acts of a son if he afforded him an opportunity to access the danger.Fact: Nasser has an airgun in his house that he keeps in an inaccessible area. One day in his absence, his 12-year-old son Syed contrives to get possession of the gun, starts playing with it and hurts his friend Daud. Daud, through his father, brings a tort action against Syed and Nasser.a)Both Nasser and Syed are liableb)Only Nasser is liablec)Only Syed is liabled)Daud does not have the capacity to initiate the actionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Father is liable for the acts of a son if he afforded him an opportunity to access the danger.Fact: Nasser has an airgun in his house that he keeps in an inaccessible area. One day in his absence, his 12-year-old son Syed contrives to get possession of the gun, starts playing with it and hurts his friend Daud. Daud, through his father, brings a tort action against Syed and Nasser.a)Both Nasser and Syed are liableb)Only Nasser is liablec)Only Syed is liabled)Daud does not have the capacity to initiate the actionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Father is liable for the acts of a son if he afforded him an opportunity to access the danger.Fact: Nasser has an airgun in his house that he keeps in an inaccessible area. One day in his absence, his 12-year-old son Syed contrives to get possession of the gun, starts playing with it and hurts his friend Daud. Daud, through his father, brings a tort action against Syed and Nasser.a)Both Nasser and Syed are liableb)Only Nasser is liablec)Only Syed is liabled)Daud does not have the capacity to initiate the actionCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.