Question Description
Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. Recovery of specific immovable property - A person entitled to the possession of specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.II. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property - If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit.Facts: Tyra Banks leased a bungalow in Beverly Hills for a period of 10 years. She lived there for a couple of months before leaving for NYC to shoot a movie. She returned after a year. The owner of the bungalow, who holds the title, wouldn’t let Banks in, claiming that she forfeited her right to enter the bungalow. Of the above-mentioned ones,Q. Which principle do you think she can sue her landlord under to gain the possession of the bungalow back (if at all)?a)Principle Ib)Principle IIc)Both principle I & IId)Neither, as she does not have the possession rightsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. Recovery of specific immovable property - A person entitled to the possession of specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.II. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property - If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit.Facts: Tyra Banks leased a bungalow in Beverly Hills for a period of 10 years. She lived there for a couple of months before leaving for NYC to shoot a movie. She returned after a year. The owner of the bungalow, who holds the title, wouldn’t let Banks in, claiming that she forfeited her right to enter the bungalow. Of the above-mentioned ones,Q. Which principle do you think she can sue her landlord under to gain the possession of the bungalow back (if at all)?a)Principle Ib)Principle IIc)Both principle I & IId)Neither, as she does not have the possession rightsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. Recovery of specific immovable property - A person entitled to the possession of specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.II. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property - If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit.Facts: Tyra Banks leased a bungalow in Beverly Hills for a period of 10 years. She lived there for a couple of months before leaving for NYC to shoot a movie. She returned after a year. The owner of the bungalow, who holds the title, wouldn’t let Banks in, claiming that she forfeited her right to enter the bungalow. Of the above-mentioned ones,Q. Which principle do you think she can sue her landlord under to gain the possession of the bungalow back (if at all)?a)Principle Ib)Principle IIc)Both principle I & IId)Neither, as she does not have the possession rightsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. Recovery of specific immovable property - A person entitled to the possession of specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.II. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property - If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit.Facts: Tyra Banks leased a bungalow in Beverly Hills for a period of 10 years. She lived there for a couple of months before leaving for NYC to shoot a movie. She returned after a year. The owner of the bungalow, who holds the title, wouldn’t let Banks in, claiming that she forfeited her right to enter the bungalow. Of the above-mentioned ones,Q. Which principle do you think she can sue her landlord under to gain the possession of the bungalow back (if at all)?a)Principle Ib)Principle IIc)Both principle I & IId)Neither, as she does not have the possession rightsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. Recovery of specific immovable property - A person entitled to the possession of specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.II. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property - If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit.Facts: Tyra Banks leased a bungalow in Beverly Hills for a period of 10 years. She lived there for a couple of months before leaving for NYC to shoot a movie. She returned after a year. The owner of the bungalow, who holds the title, wouldn’t let Banks in, claiming that she forfeited her right to enter the bungalow. Of the above-mentioned ones,Q. Which principle do you think she can sue her landlord under to gain the possession of the bungalow back (if at all)?a)Principle Ib)Principle IIc)Both principle I & IId)Neither, as she does not have the possession rightsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. Recovery of specific immovable property - A person entitled to the possession of specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.II. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property - If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit.Facts: Tyra Banks leased a bungalow in Beverly Hills for a period of 10 years. She lived there for a couple of months before leaving for NYC to shoot a movie. She returned after a year. The owner of the bungalow, who holds the title, wouldn’t let Banks in, claiming that she forfeited her right to enter the bungalow. Of the above-mentioned ones,Q. Which principle do you think she can sue her landlord under to gain the possession of the bungalow back (if at all)?a)Principle Ib)Principle IIc)Both principle I & IId)Neither, as she does not have the possession rightsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. Recovery of specific immovable property - A person entitled to the possession of specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.II. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property - If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit.Facts: Tyra Banks leased a bungalow in Beverly Hills for a period of 10 years. She lived there for a couple of months before leaving for NYC to shoot a movie. She returned after a year. The owner of the bungalow, who holds the title, wouldn’t let Banks in, claiming that she forfeited her right to enter the bungalow. Of the above-mentioned ones,Q. Which principle do you think she can sue her landlord under to gain the possession of the bungalow back (if at all)?a)Principle Ib)Principle IIc)Both principle I & IId)Neither, as she does not have the possession rightsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. Recovery of specific immovable property - A person entitled to the possession of specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.II. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property - If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit.Facts: Tyra Banks leased a bungalow in Beverly Hills for a period of 10 years. She lived there for a couple of months before leaving for NYC to shoot a movie. She returned after a year. The owner of the bungalow, who holds the title, wouldn’t let Banks in, claiming that she forfeited her right to enter the bungalow. Of the above-mentioned ones,Q. Which principle do you think she can sue her landlord under to gain the possession of the bungalow back (if at all)?a)Principle Ib)Principle IIc)Both principle I & IId)Neither, as she does not have the possession rightsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. Recovery of specific immovable property - A person entitled to the possession of specific immovable property may recover it in the manner provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.II. Suit by person dispossessed of immovable property - If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immovable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit, recover possession thereof, notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit.Facts: Tyra Banks leased a bungalow in Beverly Hills for a period of 10 years. She lived there for a couple of months before leaving for NYC to shoot a movie. She returned after a year. The owner of the bungalow, who holds the title, wouldn’t let Banks in, claiming that she forfeited her right to enter the bungalow. Of the above-mentioned ones,Q. Which principle do you think she can sue her landlord under to gain the possession of the bungalow back (if at all)?a)Principle Ib)Principle IIc)Both principle I & IId)Neither, as she does not have the possession rightsCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.