Question Description
Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person cannot be held responsible for an inevitable accident.Facts: Shiney owns a very badly maintained 1980 model second-hand motorcycle. He pays absolutely no attention to it and does not carry out necessary maintenance work either. One day, while travelling on a gravelly road at a high speed, the tyre of the motorcycle bursts and skids and hits a pedestrian, who fractures her hip. She sues Shiney.a)Shiney is not liable since the occurrence is an unforeseeable accident.b)Shiney is responsible because he kept the speed too high while driving the motorcycle. It was a very old model and did not even care about its essential maintenance.c)Shiney is not liable since the pedestrian should have reacted faster and moved out of the path of the oncoming motorcycle.d)Shiney is liable since he is riding a 21-year-old motorcycle on the roads.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person cannot be held responsible for an inevitable accident.Facts: Shiney owns a very badly maintained 1980 model second-hand motorcycle. He pays absolutely no attention to it and does not carry out necessary maintenance work either. One day, while travelling on a gravelly road at a high speed, the tyre of the motorcycle bursts and skids and hits a pedestrian, who fractures her hip. She sues Shiney.a)Shiney is not liable since the occurrence is an unforeseeable accident.b)Shiney is responsible because he kept the speed too high while driving the motorcycle. It was a very old model and did not even care about its essential maintenance.c)Shiney is not liable since the pedestrian should have reacted faster and moved out of the path of the oncoming motorcycle.d)Shiney is liable since he is riding a 21-year-old motorcycle on the roads.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person cannot be held responsible for an inevitable accident.Facts: Shiney owns a very badly maintained 1980 model second-hand motorcycle. He pays absolutely no attention to it and does not carry out necessary maintenance work either. One day, while travelling on a gravelly road at a high speed, the tyre of the motorcycle bursts and skids and hits a pedestrian, who fractures her hip. She sues Shiney.a)Shiney is not liable since the occurrence is an unforeseeable accident.b)Shiney is responsible because he kept the speed too high while driving the motorcycle. It was a very old model and did not even care about its essential maintenance.c)Shiney is not liable since the pedestrian should have reacted faster and moved out of the path of the oncoming motorcycle.d)Shiney is liable since he is riding a 21-year-old motorcycle on the roads.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person cannot be held responsible for an inevitable accident.Facts: Shiney owns a very badly maintained 1980 model second-hand motorcycle. He pays absolutely no attention to it and does not carry out necessary maintenance work either. One day, while travelling on a gravelly road at a high speed, the tyre of the motorcycle bursts and skids and hits a pedestrian, who fractures her hip. She sues Shiney.a)Shiney is not liable since the occurrence is an unforeseeable accident.b)Shiney is responsible because he kept the speed too high while driving the motorcycle. It was a very old model and did not even care about its essential maintenance.c)Shiney is not liable since the pedestrian should have reacted faster and moved out of the path of the oncoming motorcycle.d)Shiney is liable since he is riding a 21-year-old motorcycle on the roads.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person cannot be held responsible for an inevitable accident.Facts: Shiney owns a very badly maintained 1980 model second-hand motorcycle. He pays absolutely no attention to it and does not carry out necessary maintenance work either. One day, while travelling on a gravelly road at a high speed, the tyre of the motorcycle bursts and skids and hits a pedestrian, who fractures her hip. She sues Shiney.a)Shiney is not liable since the occurrence is an unforeseeable accident.b)Shiney is responsible because he kept the speed too high while driving the motorcycle. It was a very old model and did not even care about its essential maintenance.c)Shiney is not liable since the pedestrian should have reacted faster and moved out of the path of the oncoming motorcycle.d)Shiney is liable since he is riding a 21-year-old motorcycle on the roads.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person cannot be held responsible for an inevitable accident.Facts: Shiney owns a very badly maintained 1980 model second-hand motorcycle. He pays absolutely no attention to it and does not carry out necessary maintenance work either. One day, while travelling on a gravelly road at a high speed, the tyre of the motorcycle bursts and skids and hits a pedestrian, who fractures her hip. She sues Shiney.a)Shiney is not liable since the occurrence is an unforeseeable accident.b)Shiney is responsible because he kept the speed too high while driving the motorcycle. It was a very old model and did not even care about its essential maintenance.c)Shiney is not liable since the pedestrian should have reacted faster and moved out of the path of the oncoming motorcycle.d)Shiney is liable since he is riding a 21-year-old motorcycle on the roads.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person cannot be held responsible for an inevitable accident.Facts: Shiney owns a very badly maintained 1980 model second-hand motorcycle. He pays absolutely no attention to it and does not carry out necessary maintenance work either. One day, while travelling on a gravelly road at a high speed, the tyre of the motorcycle bursts and skids and hits a pedestrian, who fractures her hip. She sues Shiney.a)Shiney is not liable since the occurrence is an unforeseeable accident.b)Shiney is responsible because he kept the speed too high while driving the motorcycle. It was a very old model and did not even care about its essential maintenance.c)Shiney is not liable since the pedestrian should have reacted faster and moved out of the path of the oncoming motorcycle.d)Shiney is liable since he is riding a 21-year-old motorcycle on the roads.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person cannot be held responsible for an inevitable accident.Facts: Shiney owns a very badly maintained 1980 model second-hand motorcycle. He pays absolutely no attention to it and does not carry out necessary maintenance work either. One day, while travelling on a gravelly road at a high speed, the tyre of the motorcycle bursts and skids and hits a pedestrian, who fractures her hip. She sues Shiney.a)Shiney is not liable since the occurrence is an unforeseeable accident.b)Shiney is responsible because he kept the speed too high while driving the motorcycle. It was a very old model and did not even care about its essential maintenance.c)Shiney is not liable since the pedestrian should have reacted faster and moved out of the path of the oncoming motorcycle.d)Shiney is liable since he is riding a 21-year-old motorcycle on the roads.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: A person cannot be held responsible for an inevitable accident.Facts: Shiney owns a very badly maintained 1980 model second-hand motorcycle. He pays absolutely no attention to it and does not carry out necessary maintenance work either. One day, while travelling on a gravelly road at a high speed, the tyre of the motorcycle bursts and skids and hits a pedestrian, who fractures her hip. She sues Shiney.a)Shiney is not liable since the occurrence is an unforeseeable accident.b)Shiney is responsible because he kept the speed too high while driving the motorcycle. It was a very old model and did not even care about its essential maintenance.c)Shiney is not liable since the pedestrian should have reacted faster and moved out of the path of the oncoming motorcycle.d)Shiney is liable since he is riding a 21-year-old motorcycle on the roads.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.