Question Description
Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Whoever holds a dangerous substance as per State orders, would be solely and entirely responsible if any damage whatsoever occurs, on escape of such substance.Facts: Balbir was in possession of some water, which was on the list of Dangerous and Prohibited Substances as per the State Government. One day, while he was carrying it around, he happened to wet some Sodium in the hands of Sukhbir. An instantaneous reaction occurred and Sukhbir suffered severe corrosion.Is Balbir liable?a)Yes, as he was holding a dangerous substanceb)No, as water is a perfectly natural thing to be possessed by allc)No, as it was Sukhbir's fault for coming in front of Balbir with Sodiumd)No, as he didn't know the extent of damage that water was capable of causingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Whoever holds a dangerous substance as per State orders, would be solely and entirely responsible if any damage whatsoever occurs, on escape of such substance.Facts: Balbir was in possession of some water, which was on the list of Dangerous and Prohibited Substances as per the State Government. One day, while he was carrying it around, he happened to wet some Sodium in the hands of Sukhbir. An instantaneous reaction occurred and Sukhbir suffered severe corrosion.Is Balbir liable?a)Yes, as he was holding a dangerous substanceb)No, as water is a perfectly natural thing to be possessed by allc)No, as it was Sukhbir's fault for coming in front of Balbir with Sodiumd)No, as he didn't know the extent of damage that water was capable of causingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Whoever holds a dangerous substance as per State orders, would be solely and entirely responsible if any damage whatsoever occurs, on escape of such substance.Facts: Balbir was in possession of some water, which was on the list of Dangerous and Prohibited Substances as per the State Government. One day, while he was carrying it around, he happened to wet some Sodium in the hands of Sukhbir. An instantaneous reaction occurred and Sukhbir suffered severe corrosion.Is Balbir liable?a)Yes, as he was holding a dangerous substanceb)No, as water is a perfectly natural thing to be possessed by allc)No, as it was Sukhbir's fault for coming in front of Balbir with Sodiumd)No, as he didn't know the extent of damage that water was capable of causingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Whoever holds a dangerous substance as per State orders, would be solely and entirely responsible if any damage whatsoever occurs, on escape of such substance.Facts: Balbir was in possession of some water, which was on the list of Dangerous and Prohibited Substances as per the State Government. One day, while he was carrying it around, he happened to wet some Sodium in the hands of Sukhbir. An instantaneous reaction occurred and Sukhbir suffered severe corrosion.Is Balbir liable?a)Yes, as he was holding a dangerous substanceb)No, as water is a perfectly natural thing to be possessed by allc)No, as it was Sukhbir's fault for coming in front of Balbir with Sodiumd)No, as he didn't know the extent of damage that water was capable of causingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Whoever holds a dangerous substance as per State orders, would be solely and entirely responsible if any damage whatsoever occurs, on escape of such substance.Facts: Balbir was in possession of some water, which was on the list of Dangerous and Prohibited Substances as per the State Government. One day, while he was carrying it around, he happened to wet some Sodium in the hands of Sukhbir. An instantaneous reaction occurred and Sukhbir suffered severe corrosion.Is Balbir liable?a)Yes, as he was holding a dangerous substanceb)No, as water is a perfectly natural thing to be possessed by allc)No, as it was Sukhbir's fault for coming in front of Balbir with Sodiumd)No, as he didn't know the extent of damage that water was capable of causingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Whoever holds a dangerous substance as per State orders, would be solely and entirely responsible if any damage whatsoever occurs, on escape of such substance.Facts: Balbir was in possession of some water, which was on the list of Dangerous and Prohibited Substances as per the State Government. One day, while he was carrying it around, he happened to wet some Sodium in the hands of Sukhbir. An instantaneous reaction occurred and Sukhbir suffered severe corrosion.Is Balbir liable?a)Yes, as he was holding a dangerous substanceb)No, as water is a perfectly natural thing to be possessed by allc)No, as it was Sukhbir's fault for coming in front of Balbir with Sodiumd)No, as he didn't know the extent of damage that water was capable of causingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Whoever holds a dangerous substance as per State orders, would be solely and entirely responsible if any damage whatsoever occurs, on escape of such substance.Facts: Balbir was in possession of some water, which was on the list of Dangerous and Prohibited Substances as per the State Government. One day, while he was carrying it around, he happened to wet some Sodium in the hands of Sukhbir. An instantaneous reaction occurred and Sukhbir suffered severe corrosion.Is Balbir liable?a)Yes, as he was holding a dangerous substanceb)No, as water is a perfectly natural thing to be possessed by allc)No, as it was Sukhbir's fault for coming in front of Balbir with Sodiumd)No, as he didn't know the extent of damage that water was capable of causingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Whoever holds a dangerous substance as per State orders, would be solely and entirely responsible if any damage whatsoever occurs, on escape of such substance.Facts: Balbir was in possession of some water, which was on the list of Dangerous and Prohibited Substances as per the State Government. One day, while he was carrying it around, he happened to wet some Sodium in the hands of Sukhbir. An instantaneous reaction occurred and Sukhbir suffered severe corrosion.Is Balbir liable?a)Yes, as he was holding a dangerous substanceb)No, as water is a perfectly natural thing to be possessed by allc)No, as it was Sukhbir's fault for coming in front of Balbir with Sodiumd)No, as he didn't know the extent of damage that water was capable of causingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Whoever holds a dangerous substance as per State orders, would be solely and entirely responsible if any damage whatsoever occurs, on escape of such substance.Facts: Balbir was in possession of some water, which was on the list of Dangerous and Prohibited Substances as per the State Government. One day, while he was carrying it around, he happened to wet some Sodium in the hands of Sukhbir. An instantaneous reaction occurred and Sukhbir suffered severe corrosion.Is Balbir liable?a)Yes, as he was holding a dangerous substanceb)No, as water is a perfectly natural thing to be possessed by allc)No, as it was Sukhbir's fault for coming in front of Balbir with Sodiumd)No, as he didn't know the extent of damage that water was capable of causingCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.