Question Description
Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. A person may employ all the reasonable means necessary to protect his property.II. No person shall keep anything dangerous in his property without a sufficient notice.Fact: Ethen had a farmhouse in the outskirts of the city of Udaipur. Since he enjoyed spending his weekends writing at the farmhouse, he decided to employ a servant Ramu to take care of the house on a regular basis. A few months later, Ethen adopted a ferocious dog named Tinker and asked Ramu to care for Tinker as well. A few days after bringing in the dog to the farmhouse, Ethen asked Ramu to install a notice on the gate which read: Beware of the dog. However, the notice fell off from the gate to the ground due to the lack of proper installation. Despite Ethen’s reprimands, Ramu did not get around to installing the notice again. Meanwhile, a young couple who was passing by the farmhouse decided to enter inside and steal some mangoes for the journey. Unaware of the dog, both the husband and the wife climbed through the fence and went inside, only to be attacked seconds later by Tinker, the dog.The couple later sued Ethen for negligence.Q. Is Ethen liable?a)Yes, since Ethan is responsible for the wrongful actions of his servant Ramu, which in this case, was the negligence to install a proper notice.b)Yes, as the owner of the property, Ethan was responsible for putting up a notice to warn outsiders of the dangerous dog in the farmhouse.c)No, since Ethan has the right to use all means necessary to protect his farmhouse.d)No, since this is a case of contributory negligence and Ethan is only partially responsible for the harm caused to the couple.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. A person may employ all the reasonable means necessary to protect his property.II. No person shall keep anything dangerous in his property without a sufficient notice.Fact: Ethen had a farmhouse in the outskirts of the city of Udaipur. Since he enjoyed spending his weekends writing at the farmhouse, he decided to employ a servant Ramu to take care of the house on a regular basis. A few months later, Ethen adopted a ferocious dog named Tinker and asked Ramu to care for Tinker as well. A few days after bringing in the dog to the farmhouse, Ethen asked Ramu to install a notice on the gate which read: Beware of the dog. However, the notice fell off from the gate to the ground due to the lack of proper installation. Despite Ethen’s reprimands, Ramu did not get around to installing the notice again. Meanwhile, a young couple who was passing by the farmhouse decided to enter inside and steal some mangoes for the journey. Unaware of the dog, both the husband and the wife climbed through the fence and went inside, only to be attacked seconds later by Tinker, the dog.The couple later sued Ethen for negligence.Q. Is Ethen liable?a)Yes, since Ethan is responsible for the wrongful actions of his servant Ramu, which in this case, was the negligence to install a proper notice.b)Yes, as the owner of the property, Ethan was responsible for putting up a notice to warn outsiders of the dangerous dog in the farmhouse.c)No, since Ethan has the right to use all means necessary to protect his farmhouse.d)No, since this is a case of contributory negligence and Ethan is only partially responsible for the harm caused to the couple.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. A person may employ all the reasonable means necessary to protect his property.II. No person shall keep anything dangerous in his property without a sufficient notice.Fact: Ethen had a farmhouse in the outskirts of the city of Udaipur. Since he enjoyed spending his weekends writing at the farmhouse, he decided to employ a servant Ramu to take care of the house on a regular basis. A few months later, Ethen adopted a ferocious dog named Tinker and asked Ramu to care for Tinker as well. A few days after bringing in the dog to the farmhouse, Ethen asked Ramu to install a notice on the gate which read: Beware of the dog. However, the notice fell off from the gate to the ground due to the lack of proper installation. Despite Ethen’s reprimands, Ramu did not get around to installing the notice again. Meanwhile, a young couple who was passing by the farmhouse decided to enter inside and steal some mangoes for the journey. Unaware of the dog, both the husband and the wife climbed through the fence and went inside, only to be attacked seconds later by Tinker, the dog.The couple later sued Ethen for negligence.Q. Is Ethen liable?a)Yes, since Ethan is responsible for the wrongful actions of his servant Ramu, which in this case, was the negligence to install a proper notice.b)Yes, as the owner of the property, Ethan was responsible for putting up a notice to warn outsiders of the dangerous dog in the farmhouse.c)No, since Ethan has the right to use all means necessary to protect his farmhouse.d)No, since this is a case of contributory negligence and Ethan is only partially responsible for the harm caused to the couple.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. A person may employ all the reasonable means necessary to protect his property.II. No person shall keep anything dangerous in his property without a sufficient notice.Fact: Ethen had a farmhouse in the outskirts of the city of Udaipur. Since he enjoyed spending his weekends writing at the farmhouse, he decided to employ a servant Ramu to take care of the house on a regular basis. A few months later, Ethen adopted a ferocious dog named Tinker and asked Ramu to care for Tinker as well. A few days after bringing in the dog to the farmhouse, Ethen asked Ramu to install a notice on the gate which read: Beware of the dog. However, the notice fell off from the gate to the ground due to the lack of proper installation. Despite Ethen’s reprimands, Ramu did not get around to installing the notice again. Meanwhile, a young couple who was passing by the farmhouse decided to enter inside and steal some mangoes for the journey. Unaware of the dog, both the husband and the wife climbed through the fence and went inside, only to be attacked seconds later by Tinker, the dog.The couple later sued Ethen for negligence.Q. Is Ethen liable?a)Yes, since Ethan is responsible for the wrongful actions of his servant Ramu, which in this case, was the negligence to install a proper notice.b)Yes, as the owner of the property, Ethan was responsible for putting up a notice to warn outsiders of the dangerous dog in the farmhouse.c)No, since Ethan has the right to use all means necessary to protect his farmhouse.d)No, since this is a case of contributory negligence and Ethan is only partially responsible for the harm caused to the couple.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. A person may employ all the reasonable means necessary to protect his property.II. No person shall keep anything dangerous in his property without a sufficient notice.Fact: Ethen had a farmhouse in the outskirts of the city of Udaipur. Since he enjoyed spending his weekends writing at the farmhouse, he decided to employ a servant Ramu to take care of the house on a regular basis. A few months later, Ethen adopted a ferocious dog named Tinker and asked Ramu to care for Tinker as well. A few days after bringing in the dog to the farmhouse, Ethen asked Ramu to install a notice on the gate which read: Beware of the dog. However, the notice fell off from the gate to the ground due to the lack of proper installation. Despite Ethen’s reprimands, Ramu did not get around to installing the notice again. Meanwhile, a young couple who was passing by the farmhouse decided to enter inside and steal some mangoes for the journey. Unaware of the dog, both the husband and the wife climbed through the fence and went inside, only to be attacked seconds later by Tinker, the dog.The couple later sued Ethen for negligence.Q. Is Ethen liable?a)Yes, since Ethan is responsible for the wrongful actions of his servant Ramu, which in this case, was the negligence to install a proper notice.b)Yes, as the owner of the property, Ethan was responsible for putting up a notice to warn outsiders of the dangerous dog in the farmhouse.c)No, since Ethan has the right to use all means necessary to protect his farmhouse.d)No, since this is a case of contributory negligence and Ethan is only partially responsible for the harm caused to the couple.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. A person may employ all the reasonable means necessary to protect his property.II. No person shall keep anything dangerous in his property without a sufficient notice.Fact: Ethen had a farmhouse in the outskirts of the city of Udaipur. Since he enjoyed spending his weekends writing at the farmhouse, he decided to employ a servant Ramu to take care of the house on a regular basis. A few months later, Ethen adopted a ferocious dog named Tinker and asked Ramu to care for Tinker as well. A few days after bringing in the dog to the farmhouse, Ethen asked Ramu to install a notice on the gate which read: Beware of the dog. However, the notice fell off from the gate to the ground due to the lack of proper installation. Despite Ethen’s reprimands, Ramu did not get around to installing the notice again. Meanwhile, a young couple who was passing by the farmhouse decided to enter inside and steal some mangoes for the journey. Unaware of the dog, both the husband and the wife climbed through the fence and went inside, only to be attacked seconds later by Tinker, the dog.The couple later sued Ethen for negligence.Q. Is Ethen liable?a)Yes, since Ethan is responsible for the wrongful actions of his servant Ramu, which in this case, was the negligence to install a proper notice.b)Yes, as the owner of the property, Ethan was responsible for putting up a notice to warn outsiders of the dangerous dog in the farmhouse.c)No, since Ethan has the right to use all means necessary to protect his farmhouse.d)No, since this is a case of contributory negligence and Ethan is only partially responsible for the harm caused to the couple.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. A person may employ all the reasonable means necessary to protect his property.II. No person shall keep anything dangerous in his property without a sufficient notice.Fact: Ethen had a farmhouse in the outskirts of the city of Udaipur. Since he enjoyed spending his weekends writing at the farmhouse, he decided to employ a servant Ramu to take care of the house on a regular basis. A few months later, Ethen adopted a ferocious dog named Tinker and asked Ramu to care for Tinker as well. A few days after bringing in the dog to the farmhouse, Ethen asked Ramu to install a notice on the gate which read: Beware of the dog. However, the notice fell off from the gate to the ground due to the lack of proper installation. Despite Ethen’s reprimands, Ramu did not get around to installing the notice again. Meanwhile, a young couple who was passing by the farmhouse decided to enter inside and steal some mangoes for the journey. Unaware of the dog, both the husband and the wife climbed through the fence and went inside, only to be attacked seconds later by Tinker, the dog.The couple later sued Ethen for negligence.Q. Is Ethen liable?a)Yes, since Ethan is responsible for the wrongful actions of his servant Ramu, which in this case, was the negligence to install a proper notice.b)Yes, as the owner of the property, Ethan was responsible for putting up a notice to warn outsiders of the dangerous dog in the farmhouse.c)No, since Ethan has the right to use all means necessary to protect his farmhouse.d)No, since this is a case of contributory negligence and Ethan is only partially responsible for the harm caused to the couple.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. A person may employ all the reasonable means necessary to protect his property.II. No person shall keep anything dangerous in his property without a sufficient notice.Fact: Ethen had a farmhouse in the outskirts of the city of Udaipur. Since he enjoyed spending his weekends writing at the farmhouse, he decided to employ a servant Ramu to take care of the house on a regular basis. A few months later, Ethen adopted a ferocious dog named Tinker and asked Ramu to care for Tinker as well. A few days after bringing in the dog to the farmhouse, Ethen asked Ramu to install a notice on the gate which read: Beware of the dog. However, the notice fell off from the gate to the ground due to the lack of proper installation. Despite Ethen’s reprimands, Ramu did not get around to installing the notice again. Meanwhile, a young couple who was passing by the farmhouse decided to enter inside and steal some mangoes for the journey. Unaware of the dog, both the husband and the wife climbed through the fence and went inside, only to be attacked seconds later by Tinker, the dog.The couple later sued Ethen for negligence.Q. Is Ethen liable?a)Yes, since Ethan is responsible for the wrongful actions of his servant Ramu, which in this case, was the negligence to install a proper notice.b)Yes, as the owner of the property, Ethan was responsible for putting up a notice to warn outsiders of the dangerous dog in the farmhouse.c)No, since Ethan has the right to use all means necessary to protect his farmhouse.d)No, since this is a case of contributory negligence and Ethan is only partially responsible for the harm caused to the couple.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle:I. A person may employ all the reasonable means necessary to protect his property.II. No person shall keep anything dangerous in his property without a sufficient notice.Fact: Ethen had a farmhouse in the outskirts of the city of Udaipur. Since he enjoyed spending his weekends writing at the farmhouse, he decided to employ a servant Ramu to take care of the house on a regular basis. A few months later, Ethen adopted a ferocious dog named Tinker and asked Ramu to care for Tinker as well. A few days after bringing in the dog to the farmhouse, Ethen asked Ramu to install a notice on the gate which read: Beware of the dog. However, the notice fell off from the gate to the ground due to the lack of proper installation. Despite Ethen’s reprimands, Ramu did not get around to installing the notice again. Meanwhile, a young couple who was passing by the farmhouse decided to enter inside and steal some mangoes for the journey. Unaware of the dog, both the husband and the wife climbed through the fence and went inside, only to be attacked seconds later by Tinker, the dog.The couple later sued Ethen for negligence.Q. Is Ethen liable?a)Yes, since Ethan is responsible for the wrongful actions of his servant Ramu, which in this case, was the negligence to install a proper notice.b)Yes, as the owner of the property, Ethan was responsible for putting up a notice to warn outsiders of the dangerous dog in the farmhouse.c)No, since Ethan has the right to use all means necessary to protect his farmhouse.d)No, since this is a case of contributory negligence and Ethan is only partially responsible for the harm caused to the couple.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.