Question Description
Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Nothing is an offence that is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve years of age.Facts: Sid is a ten-year-old boy. On New Years’ eve, there was a huge party at his family friend’s house. While everybody was busy in the party, Sid stole a diamond ring from the owner’s dressing table, with the sole purpose of selling it and earning some money.Q. Should he be held liable for stealing?a)Yes, as Sid possessed the required mental capacity to perform the act of stealing the diamond ring, with the sole purpose of selling it.b)Yes, as Sid was aware of how expensive diamond rings are and intended to use the money.c)No, as Sid is ten and his act cannot be said to constitute an offence.d)No, Sid did not have the required mensrea to commit the crime of stealing under the IPC.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Nothing is an offence that is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve years of age.Facts: Sid is a ten-year-old boy. On New Years’ eve, there was a huge party at his family friend’s house. While everybody was busy in the party, Sid stole a diamond ring from the owner’s dressing table, with the sole purpose of selling it and earning some money.Q. Should he be held liable for stealing?a)Yes, as Sid possessed the required mental capacity to perform the act of stealing the diamond ring, with the sole purpose of selling it.b)Yes, as Sid was aware of how expensive diamond rings are and intended to use the money.c)No, as Sid is ten and his act cannot be said to constitute an offence.d)No, Sid did not have the required mensrea to commit the crime of stealing under the IPC.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Nothing is an offence that is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve years of age.Facts: Sid is a ten-year-old boy. On New Years’ eve, there was a huge party at his family friend’s house. While everybody was busy in the party, Sid stole a diamond ring from the owner’s dressing table, with the sole purpose of selling it and earning some money.Q. Should he be held liable for stealing?a)Yes, as Sid possessed the required mental capacity to perform the act of stealing the diamond ring, with the sole purpose of selling it.b)Yes, as Sid was aware of how expensive diamond rings are and intended to use the money.c)No, as Sid is ten and his act cannot be said to constitute an offence.d)No, Sid did not have the required mensrea to commit the crime of stealing under the IPC.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Nothing is an offence that is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve years of age.Facts: Sid is a ten-year-old boy. On New Years’ eve, there was a huge party at his family friend’s house. While everybody was busy in the party, Sid stole a diamond ring from the owner’s dressing table, with the sole purpose of selling it and earning some money.Q. Should he be held liable for stealing?a)Yes, as Sid possessed the required mental capacity to perform the act of stealing the diamond ring, with the sole purpose of selling it.b)Yes, as Sid was aware of how expensive diamond rings are and intended to use the money.c)No, as Sid is ten and his act cannot be said to constitute an offence.d)No, Sid did not have the required mensrea to commit the crime of stealing under the IPC.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Nothing is an offence that is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve years of age.Facts: Sid is a ten-year-old boy. On New Years’ eve, there was a huge party at his family friend’s house. While everybody was busy in the party, Sid stole a diamond ring from the owner’s dressing table, with the sole purpose of selling it and earning some money.Q. Should he be held liable for stealing?a)Yes, as Sid possessed the required mental capacity to perform the act of stealing the diamond ring, with the sole purpose of selling it.b)Yes, as Sid was aware of how expensive diamond rings are and intended to use the money.c)No, as Sid is ten and his act cannot be said to constitute an offence.d)No, Sid did not have the required mensrea to commit the crime of stealing under the IPC.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Nothing is an offence that is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve years of age.Facts: Sid is a ten-year-old boy. On New Years’ eve, there was a huge party at his family friend’s house. While everybody was busy in the party, Sid stole a diamond ring from the owner’s dressing table, with the sole purpose of selling it and earning some money.Q. Should he be held liable for stealing?a)Yes, as Sid possessed the required mental capacity to perform the act of stealing the diamond ring, with the sole purpose of selling it.b)Yes, as Sid was aware of how expensive diamond rings are and intended to use the money.c)No, as Sid is ten and his act cannot be said to constitute an offence.d)No, Sid did not have the required mensrea to commit the crime of stealing under the IPC.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Nothing is an offence that is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve years of age.Facts: Sid is a ten-year-old boy. On New Years’ eve, there was a huge party at his family friend’s house. While everybody was busy in the party, Sid stole a diamond ring from the owner’s dressing table, with the sole purpose of selling it and earning some money.Q. Should he be held liable for stealing?a)Yes, as Sid possessed the required mental capacity to perform the act of stealing the diamond ring, with the sole purpose of selling it.b)Yes, as Sid was aware of how expensive diamond rings are and intended to use the money.c)No, as Sid is ten and his act cannot be said to constitute an offence.d)No, Sid did not have the required mensrea to commit the crime of stealing under the IPC.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Nothing is an offence that is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve years of age.Facts: Sid is a ten-year-old boy. On New Years’ eve, there was a huge party at his family friend’s house. While everybody was busy in the party, Sid stole a diamond ring from the owner’s dressing table, with the sole purpose of selling it and earning some money.Q. Should he be held liable for stealing?a)Yes, as Sid possessed the required mental capacity to perform the act of stealing the diamond ring, with the sole purpose of selling it.b)Yes, as Sid was aware of how expensive diamond rings are and intended to use the money.c)No, as Sid is ten and his act cannot be said to constitute an offence.d)No, Sid did not have the required mensrea to commit the crime of stealing under the IPC.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The question consists of legal propositions/ principles (hereinafter referred to as 'principle') and facts. These principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion.Principle: Nothing is an offence that is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve years of age.Facts: Sid is a ten-year-old boy. On New Years’ eve, there was a huge party at his family friend’s house. While everybody was busy in the party, Sid stole a diamond ring from the owner’s dressing table, with the sole purpose of selling it and earning some money.Q. Should he be held liable for stealing?a)Yes, as Sid possessed the required mental capacity to perform the act of stealing the diamond ring, with the sole purpose of selling it.b)Yes, as Sid was aware of how expensive diamond rings are and intended to use the money.c)No, as Sid is ten and his act cannot be said to constitute an offence.d)No, Sid did not have the required mensrea to commit the crime of stealing under the IPC.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.