Question Description
Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing nuisance.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of ‘private nuisance’.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing nuisance.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of ‘private nuisance’.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing nuisance.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of ‘private nuisance’.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing nuisance.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of ‘private nuisance’.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing nuisance.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of ‘private nuisance’.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing nuisance.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of ‘private nuisance’.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing nuisance.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of ‘private nuisance’.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing nuisance.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of ‘private nuisance’.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Zorro purchases a house in a residential locality despite being aware of the fact that adjacent to the house, a very noisy factory operates and has been operating for the past three years. After shifting to the house he found the sound extremely disturbing and sues the factory owner for causing nuisance.Principle: Unreasonable interference with the use or enjoyment of a person's property such that it causes damage constitutes the tort of ‘private nuisance’.a)The factory owner is liable for causing nuisance.b)The factory owner is not liable for causing nuisance because he has been running the factory in the same manner for the past three years.c)Zorro, having purchased the house despite being aware of the factory, implies his voluntary acceptance of the noise - he cannot now complain against it.d)The factory owner is not liable because he has taken utmost care to keep the noise to a minimum.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.