Question Description
Paragraph:The establishment of Islamic Courts (Darul Qaza) is for the application & implementation of Shariat Laws on the Muslim Ummah. Establishment and functioning of Imarat-e-Sharia in Bihar and Orissa is a glaring example of Darul Qaza. These courts are rendering great services to the masses in the aforesaid states particularly for Muslims. It is headed by Chief Qazi and there are about six courts of additional Qazi at the Headquarter and there are 34 Sub-Judicial Courts in different districts of Bihar.These courts have been established to decide the disputes amongst the Muslims with regard to the Inheritance, marriage, divorce and waqf in particular and other property related matters in accordance with Shariat Laws, so that the Muslims could be saved from costly and time taking procedure of general Courts of Land. Disputes are solved amicably, only judgements are not delivered, rather efforts are made to arouse the feeling of brotherhood, oneness and mutual love and affection between the parties in dispute. Fairness and transparent judicial pronouncement of these Islamic Courts have succeeded in attracting faith and confidence of majority of Muslims belonging to the state of Bihar and Orissa in particular and of other parts of India in general. The people believed in unbiased justice delivered by the Chief Qazi who perform the role of Judge.All India Muslim Personal Law Board has also established Darul Qaza in different parts of India. They are in Thane (Maharashtra), Akola Dholiya (Rajasthan), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), South & East Delhi, Asansol & Purulia (West Bengal), Lucknow & Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh).The question of utmost importance before the Muslim Community is whether the Courts in India will accept the decisions given by Darul Qaza or will they pay any attention to the decisions given by the aforesaid institution? If the decisions given by this Institution are not accepted by the Courts it will lose its face value. It will be a futile exercise. Generally, in India the Courts do not recognize the existence of Shariat Court.In 2005 the Supreme Court admitted a Public Interest Litigation petition to examine the legality of the Islamic Shariah Court in the country allegedly posing challenge to the Indian Legal System. However, the Government of India in its affidavit had said that Fatwas issued by Muslim Clerics are simply the opinions and cannot be imposed or enforced on anyone. The Court said Darul Qaza and Nizam-e-Qaza are not parallel judicial system and did not prevent Muslims from setting up their case under the law of land.Q. In a dispute between Shah Rukh and Amir, an Islamic court has asked both the parties to divide the property equally as a part of settlement and has asked Amir to pay a compensation of 50,000 rupees as punishment for the mental harassment caused to Shah Rukh. Amir has approached court against this decision.a)Court can ask both of them to abide by the Settlement but not the punishmentb)Court can ask both of them to abide by the punishment but not the settlementc)Court can disregard the complete decisiond)Court should consider the opinion of the QaziCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Paragraph:The establishment of Islamic Courts (Darul Qaza) is for the application & implementation of Shariat Laws on the Muslim Ummah. Establishment and functioning of Imarat-e-Sharia in Bihar and Orissa is a glaring example of Darul Qaza. These courts are rendering great services to the masses in the aforesaid states particularly for Muslims. It is headed by Chief Qazi and there are about six courts of additional Qazi at the Headquarter and there are 34 Sub-Judicial Courts in different districts of Bihar.These courts have been established to decide the disputes amongst the Muslims with regard to the Inheritance, marriage, divorce and waqf in particular and other property related matters in accordance with Shariat Laws, so that the Muslims could be saved from costly and time taking procedure of general Courts of Land. Disputes are solved amicably, only judgements are not delivered, rather efforts are made to arouse the feeling of brotherhood, oneness and mutual love and affection between the parties in dispute. Fairness and transparent judicial pronouncement of these Islamic Courts have succeeded in attracting faith and confidence of majority of Muslims belonging to the state of Bihar and Orissa in particular and of other parts of India in general. The people believed in unbiased justice delivered by the Chief Qazi who perform the role of Judge.All India Muslim Personal Law Board has also established Darul Qaza in different parts of India. They are in Thane (Maharashtra), Akola Dholiya (Rajasthan), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), South & East Delhi, Asansol & Purulia (West Bengal), Lucknow & Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh).The question of utmost importance before the Muslim Community is whether the Courts in India will accept the decisions given by Darul Qaza or will they pay any attention to the decisions given by the aforesaid institution? If the decisions given by this Institution are not accepted by the Courts it will lose its face value. It will be a futile exercise. Generally, in India the Courts do not recognize the existence of Shariat Court.In 2005 the Supreme Court admitted a Public Interest Litigation petition to examine the legality of the Islamic Shariah Court in the country allegedly posing challenge to the Indian Legal System. However, the Government of India in its affidavit had said that Fatwas issued by Muslim Clerics are simply the opinions and cannot be imposed or enforced on anyone. The Court said Darul Qaza and Nizam-e-Qaza are not parallel judicial system and did not prevent Muslims from setting up their case under the law of land.Q. In a dispute between Shah Rukh and Amir, an Islamic court has asked both the parties to divide the property equally as a part of settlement and has asked Amir to pay a compensation of 50,000 rupees as punishment for the mental harassment caused to Shah Rukh. Amir has approached court against this decision.a)Court can ask both of them to abide by the Settlement but not the punishmentb)Court can ask both of them to abide by the punishment but not the settlementc)Court can disregard the complete decisiond)Court should consider the opinion of the QaziCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Paragraph:The establishment of Islamic Courts (Darul Qaza) is for the application & implementation of Shariat Laws on the Muslim Ummah. Establishment and functioning of Imarat-e-Sharia in Bihar and Orissa is a glaring example of Darul Qaza. These courts are rendering great services to the masses in the aforesaid states particularly for Muslims. It is headed by Chief Qazi and there are about six courts of additional Qazi at the Headquarter and there are 34 Sub-Judicial Courts in different districts of Bihar.These courts have been established to decide the disputes amongst the Muslims with regard to the Inheritance, marriage, divorce and waqf in particular and other property related matters in accordance with Shariat Laws, so that the Muslims could be saved from costly and time taking procedure of general Courts of Land. Disputes are solved amicably, only judgements are not delivered, rather efforts are made to arouse the feeling of brotherhood, oneness and mutual love and affection between the parties in dispute. Fairness and transparent judicial pronouncement of these Islamic Courts have succeeded in attracting faith and confidence of majority of Muslims belonging to the state of Bihar and Orissa in particular and of other parts of India in general. The people believed in unbiased justice delivered by the Chief Qazi who perform the role of Judge.All India Muslim Personal Law Board has also established Darul Qaza in different parts of India. They are in Thane (Maharashtra), Akola Dholiya (Rajasthan), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), South & East Delhi, Asansol & Purulia (West Bengal), Lucknow & Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh).The question of utmost importance before the Muslim Community is whether the Courts in India will accept the decisions given by Darul Qaza or will they pay any attention to the decisions given by the aforesaid institution? If the decisions given by this Institution are not accepted by the Courts it will lose its face value. It will be a futile exercise. Generally, in India the Courts do not recognize the existence of Shariat Court.In 2005 the Supreme Court admitted a Public Interest Litigation petition to examine the legality of the Islamic Shariah Court in the country allegedly posing challenge to the Indian Legal System. However, the Government of India in its affidavit had said that Fatwas issued by Muslim Clerics are simply the opinions and cannot be imposed or enforced on anyone. The Court said Darul Qaza and Nizam-e-Qaza are not parallel judicial system and did not prevent Muslims from setting up their case under the law of land.Q. In a dispute between Shah Rukh and Amir, an Islamic court has asked both the parties to divide the property equally as a part of settlement and has asked Amir to pay a compensation of 50,000 rupees as punishment for the mental harassment caused to Shah Rukh. Amir has approached court against this decision.a)Court can ask both of them to abide by the Settlement but not the punishmentb)Court can ask both of them to abide by the punishment but not the settlementc)Court can disregard the complete decisiond)Court should consider the opinion of the QaziCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Paragraph:The establishment of Islamic Courts (Darul Qaza) is for the application & implementation of Shariat Laws on the Muslim Ummah. Establishment and functioning of Imarat-e-Sharia in Bihar and Orissa is a glaring example of Darul Qaza. These courts are rendering great services to the masses in the aforesaid states particularly for Muslims. It is headed by Chief Qazi and there are about six courts of additional Qazi at the Headquarter and there are 34 Sub-Judicial Courts in different districts of Bihar.These courts have been established to decide the disputes amongst the Muslims with regard to the Inheritance, marriage, divorce and waqf in particular and other property related matters in accordance with Shariat Laws, so that the Muslims could be saved from costly and time taking procedure of general Courts of Land. Disputes are solved amicably, only judgements are not delivered, rather efforts are made to arouse the feeling of brotherhood, oneness and mutual love and affection between the parties in dispute. Fairness and transparent judicial pronouncement of these Islamic Courts have succeeded in attracting faith and confidence of majority of Muslims belonging to the state of Bihar and Orissa in particular and of other parts of India in general. The people believed in unbiased justice delivered by the Chief Qazi who perform the role of Judge.All India Muslim Personal Law Board has also established Darul Qaza in different parts of India. They are in Thane (Maharashtra), Akola Dholiya (Rajasthan), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), South & East Delhi, Asansol & Purulia (West Bengal), Lucknow & Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh).The question of utmost importance before the Muslim Community is whether the Courts in India will accept the decisions given by Darul Qaza or will they pay any attention to the decisions given by the aforesaid institution? If the decisions given by this Institution are not accepted by the Courts it will lose its face value. It will be a futile exercise. Generally, in India the Courts do not recognize the existence of Shariat Court.In 2005 the Supreme Court admitted a Public Interest Litigation petition to examine the legality of the Islamic Shariah Court in the country allegedly posing challenge to the Indian Legal System. However, the Government of India in its affidavit had said that Fatwas issued by Muslim Clerics are simply the opinions and cannot be imposed or enforced on anyone. The Court said Darul Qaza and Nizam-e-Qaza are not parallel judicial system and did not prevent Muslims from setting up their case under the law of land.Q. In a dispute between Shah Rukh and Amir, an Islamic court has asked both the parties to divide the property equally as a part of settlement and has asked Amir to pay a compensation of 50,000 rupees as punishment for the mental harassment caused to Shah Rukh. Amir has approached court against this decision.a)Court can ask both of them to abide by the Settlement but not the punishmentb)Court can ask both of them to abide by the punishment but not the settlementc)Court can disregard the complete decisiond)Court should consider the opinion of the QaziCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Paragraph:The establishment of Islamic Courts (Darul Qaza) is for the application & implementation of Shariat Laws on the Muslim Ummah. Establishment and functioning of Imarat-e-Sharia in Bihar and Orissa is a glaring example of Darul Qaza. These courts are rendering great services to the masses in the aforesaid states particularly for Muslims. It is headed by Chief Qazi and there are about six courts of additional Qazi at the Headquarter and there are 34 Sub-Judicial Courts in different districts of Bihar.These courts have been established to decide the disputes amongst the Muslims with regard to the Inheritance, marriage, divorce and waqf in particular and other property related matters in accordance with Shariat Laws, so that the Muslims could be saved from costly and time taking procedure of general Courts of Land. Disputes are solved amicably, only judgements are not delivered, rather efforts are made to arouse the feeling of brotherhood, oneness and mutual love and affection between the parties in dispute. Fairness and transparent judicial pronouncement of these Islamic Courts have succeeded in attracting faith and confidence of majority of Muslims belonging to the state of Bihar and Orissa in particular and of other parts of India in general. The people believed in unbiased justice delivered by the Chief Qazi who perform the role of Judge.All India Muslim Personal Law Board has also established Darul Qaza in different parts of India. They are in Thane (Maharashtra), Akola Dholiya (Rajasthan), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), South & East Delhi, Asansol & Purulia (West Bengal), Lucknow & Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh).The question of utmost importance before the Muslim Community is whether the Courts in India will accept the decisions given by Darul Qaza or will they pay any attention to the decisions given by the aforesaid institution? If the decisions given by this Institution are not accepted by the Courts it will lose its face value. It will be a futile exercise. Generally, in India the Courts do not recognize the existence of Shariat Court.In 2005 the Supreme Court admitted a Public Interest Litigation petition to examine the legality of the Islamic Shariah Court in the country allegedly posing challenge to the Indian Legal System. However, the Government of India in its affidavit had said that Fatwas issued by Muslim Clerics are simply the opinions and cannot be imposed or enforced on anyone. The Court said Darul Qaza and Nizam-e-Qaza are not parallel judicial system and did not prevent Muslims from setting up their case under the law of land.Q. In a dispute between Shah Rukh and Amir, an Islamic court has asked both the parties to divide the property equally as a part of settlement and has asked Amir to pay a compensation of 50,000 rupees as punishment for the mental harassment caused to Shah Rukh. Amir has approached court against this decision.a)Court can ask both of them to abide by the Settlement but not the punishmentb)Court can ask both of them to abide by the punishment but not the settlementc)Court can disregard the complete decisiond)Court should consider the opinion of the QaziCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Paragraph:The establishment of Islamic Courts (Darul Qaza) is for the application & implementation of Shariat Laws on the Muslim Ummah. Establishment and functioning of Imarat-e-Sharia in Bihar and Orissa is a glaring example of Darul Qaza. These courts are rendering great services to the masses in the aforesaid states particularly for Muslims. It is headed by Chief Qazi and there are about six courts of additional Qazi at the Headquarter and there are 34 Sub-Judicial Courts in different districts of Bihar.These courts have been established to decide the disputes amongst the Muslims with regard to the Inheritance, marriage, divorce and waqf in particular and other property related matters in accordance with Shariat Laws, so that the Muslims could be saved from costly and time taking procedure of general Courts of Land. Disputes are solved amicably, only judgements are not delivered, rather efforts are made to arouse the feeling of brotherhood, oneness and mutual love and affection between the parties in dispute. Fairness and transparent judicial pronouncement of these Islamic Courts have succeeded in attracting faith and confidence of majority of Muslims belonging to the state of Bihar and Orissa in particular and of other parts of India in general. The people believed in unbiased justice delivered by the Chief Qazi who perform the role of Judge.All India Muslim Personal Law Board has also established Darul Qaza in different parts of India. They are in Thane (Maharashtra), Akola Dholiya (Rajasthan), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), South & East Delhi, Asansol & Purulia (West Bengal), Lucknow & Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh).The question of utmost importance before the Muslim Community is whether the Courts in India will accept the decisions given by Darul Qaza or will they pay any attention to the decisions given by the aforesaid institution? If the decisions given by this Institution are not accepted by the Courts it will lose its face value. It will be a futile exercise. Generally, in India the Courts do not recognize the existence of Shariat Court.In 2005 the Supreme Court admitted a Public Interest Litigation petition to examine the legality of the Islamic Shariah Court in the country allegedly posing challenge to the Indian Legal System. However, the Government of India in its affidavit had said that Fatwas issued by Muslim Clerics are simply the opinions and cannot be imposed or enforced on anyone. The Court said Darul Qaza and Nizam-e-Qaza are not parallel judicial system and did not prevent Muslims from setting up their case under the law of land.Q. In a dispute between Shah Rukh and Amir, an Islamic court has asked both the parties to divide the property equally as a part of settlement and has asked Amir to pay a compensation of 50,000 rupees as punishment for the mental harassment caused to Shah Rukh. Amir has approached court against this decision.a)Court can ask both of them to abide by the Settlement but not the punishmentb)Court can ask both of them to abide by the punishment but not the settlementc)Court can disregard the complete decisiond)Court should consider the opinion of the QaziCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Paragraph:The establishment of Islamic Courts (Darul Qaza) is for the application & implementation of Shariat Laws on the Muslim Ummah. Establishment and functioning of Imarat-e-Sharia in Bihar and Orissa is a glaring example of Darul Qaza. These courts are rendering great services to the masses in the aforesaid states particularly for Muslims. It is headed by Chief Qazi and there are about six courts of additional Qazi at the Headquarter and there are 34 Sub-Judicial Courts in different districts of Bihar.These courts have been established to decide the disputes amongst the Muslims with regard to the Inheritance, marriage, divorce and waqf in particular and other property related matters in accordance with Shariat Laws, so that the Muslims could be saved from costly and time taking procedure of general Courts of Land. Disputes are solved amicably, only judgements are not delivered, rather efforts are made to arouse the feeling of brotherhood, oneness and mutual love and affection between the parties in dispute. Fairness and transparent judicial pronouncement of these Islamic Courts have succeeded in attracting faith and confidence of majority of Muslims belonging to the state of Bihar and Orissa in particular and of other parts of India in general. The people believed in unbiased justice delivered by the Chief Qazi who perform the role of Judge.All India Muslim Personal Law Board has also established Darul Qaza in different parts of India. They are in Thane (Maharashtra), Akola Dholiya (Rajasthan), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), South & East Delhi, Asansol & Purulia (West Bengal), Lucknow & Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh).The question of utmost importance before the Muslim Community is whether the Courts in India will accept the decisions given by Darul Qaza or will they pay any attention to the decisions given by the aforesaid institution? If the decisions given by this Institution are not accepted by the Courts it will lose its face value. It will be a futile exercise. Generally, in India the Courts do not recognize the existence of Shariat Court.In 2005 the Supreme Court admitted a Public Interest Litigation petition to examine the legality of the Islamic Shariah Court in the country allegedly posing challenge to the Indian Legal System. However, the Government of India in its affidavit had said that Fatwas issued by Muslim Clerics are simply the opinions and cannot be imposed or enforced on anyone. The Court said Darul Qaza and Nizam-e-Qaza are not parallel judicial system and did not prevent Muslims from setting up their case under the law of land.Q. In a dispute between Shah Rukh and Amir, an Islamic court has asked both the parties to divide the property equally as a part of settlement and has asked Amir to pay a compensation of 50,000 rupees as punishment for the mental harassment caused to Shah Rukh. Amir has approached court against this decision.a)Court can ask both of them to abide by the Settlement but not the punishmentb)Court can ask both of them to abide by the punishment but not the settlementc)Court can disregard the complete decisiond)Court should consider the opinion of the QaziCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Paragraph:The establishment of Islamic Courts (Darul Qaza) is for the application & implementation of Shariat Laws on the Muslim Ummah. Establishment and functioning of Imarat-e-Sharia in Bihar and Orissa is a glaring example of Darul Qaza. These courts are rendering great services to the masses in the aforesaid states particularly for Muslims. It is headed by Chief Qazi and there are about six courts of additional Qazi at the Headquarter and there are 34 Sub-Judicial Courts in different districts of Bihar.These courts have been established to decide the disputes amongst the Muslims with regard to the Inheritance, marriage, divorce and waqf in particular and other property related matters in accordance with Shariat Laws, so that the Muslims could be saved from costly and time taking procedure of general Courts of Land. Disputes are solved amicably, only judgements are not delivered, rather efforts are made to arouse the feeling of brotherhood, oneness and mutual love and affection between the parties in dispute. Fairness and transparent judicial pronouncement of these Islamic Courts have succeeded in attracting faith and confidence of majority of Muslims belonging to the state of Bihar and Orissa in particular and of other parts of India in general. The people believed in unbiased justice delivered by the Chief Qazi who perform the role of Judge.All India Muslim Personal Law Board has also established Darul Qaza in different parts of India. They are in Thane (Maharashtra), Akola Dholiya (Rajasthan), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), South & East Delhi, Asansol & Purulia (West Bengal), Lucknow & Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh).The question of utmost importance before the Muslim Community is whether the Courts in India will accept the decisions given by Darul Qaza or will they pay any attention to the decisions given by the aforesaid institution? If the decisions given by this Institution are not accepted by the Courts it will lose its face value. It will be a futile exercise. Generally, in India the Courts do not recognize the existence of Shariat Court.In 2005 the Supreme Court admitted a Public Interest Litigation petition to examine the legality of the Islamic Shariah Court in the country allegedly posing challenge to the Indian Legal System. However, the Government of India in its affidavit had said that Fatwas issued by Muslim Clerics are simply the opinions and cannot be imposed or enforced on anyone. The Court said Darul Qaza and Nizam-e-Qaza are not parallel judicial system and did not prevent Muslims from setting up their case under the law of land.Q. In a dispute between Shah Rukh and Amir, an Islamic court has asked both the parties to divide the property equally as a part of settlement and has asked Amir to pay a compensation of 50,000 rupees as punishment for the mental harassment caused to Shah Rukh. Amir has approached court against this decision.a)Court can ask both of them to abide by the Settlement but not the punishmentb)Court can ask both of them to abide by the punishment but not the settlementc)Court can disregard the complete decisiond)Court should consider the opinion of the QaziCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Paragraph:The establishment of Islamic Courts (Darul Qaza) is for the application & implementation of Shariat Laws on the Muslim Ummah. Establishment and functioning of Imarat-e-Sharia in Bihar and Orissa is a glaring example of Darul Qaza. These courts are rendering great services to the masses in the aforesaid states particularly for Muslims. It is headed by Chief Qazi and there are about six courts of additional Qazi at the Headquarter and there are 34 Sub-Judicial Courts in different districts of Bihar.These courts have been established to decide the disputes amongst the Muslims with regard to the Inheritance, marriage, divorce and waqf in particular and other property related matters in accordance with Shariat Laws, so that the Muslims could be saved from costly and time taking procedure of general Courts of Land. Disputes are solved amicably, only judgements are not delivered, rather efforts are made to arouse the feeling of brotherhood, oneness and mutual love and affection between the parties in dispute. Fairness and transparent judicial pronouncement of these Islamic Courts have succeeded in attracting faith and confidence of majority of Muslims belonging to the state of Bihar and Orissa in particular and of other parts of India in general. The people believed in unbiased justice delivered by the Chief Qazi who perform the role of Judge.All India Muslim Personal Law Board has also established Darul Qaza in different parts of India. They are in Thane (Maharashtra), Akola Dholiya (Rajasthan), Indore (Madhya Pradesh), South & East Delhi, Asansol & Purulia (West Bengal), Lucknow & Sitapur (Uttar Pradesh).The question of utmost importance before the Muslim Community is whether the Courts in India will accept the decisions given by Darul Qaza or will they pay any attention to the decisions given by the aforesaid institution? If the decisions given by this Institution are not accepted by the Courts it will lose its face value. It will be a futile exercise. Generally, in India the Courts do not recognize the existence of Shariat Court.In 2005 the Supreme Court admitted a Public Interest Litigation petition to examine the legality of the Islamic Shariah Court in the country allegedly posing challenge to the Indian Legal System. However, the Government of India in its affidavit had said that Fatwas issued by Muslim Clerics are simply the opinions and cannot be imposed or enforced on anyone. The Court said Darul Qaza and Nizam-e-Qaza are not parallel judicial system and did not prevent Muslims from setting up their case under the law of land.Q. In a dispute between Shah Rukh and Amir, an Islamic court has asked both the parties to divide the property equally as a part of settlement and has asked Amir to pay a compensation of 50,000 rupees as punishment for the mental harassment caused to Shah Rukh. Amir has approached court against this decision.a)Court can ask both of them to abide by the Settlement but not the punishmentb)Court can ask both of them to abide by the punishment but not the settlementc)Court can disregard the complete decisiond)Court should consider the opinion of the QaziCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.