Question Description
The recent news that local hospitals have had to reroute seriously ill patients because the community’s critical-care beds are full, is worrisome. Earlier this week, four of the six local hospitals ran out of space for the critically ill and had to turn people away.Federal law requires hospitals to treat anyone who walks in. As a result of having to treat large numbers of uninsured patients, the emergency rooms often become an economic drain on their hospitals. Doctors now want to set up their own free-standing ambulatory surgical facilities and diagnostic centres. Critics contend that this would leave hospitals with less revenue and the same number of indigents to treat.A bill was recently introduced to phase out the need for a “certificate of public need” for non-hospital-based facilities, provided those facilities met stringent regulations and requirements. This would have made it easier to set up alternative facilities to help indigent patients. The finance committee baulked at the hefty price and killed the bill, another casualty of a failed legislative session.Unfortunately, the problem of access to medical care for those of limited means is not going to go away anytime soon and, despite the well-intended regulations, too-full hospitals compromise everyone’s welfare. Healthy competition with small neighbor hood surgical and diagnostic centres may be what is necessary to help dampen rising medical costs. But under no circumstances should the hospitals be forced to care for everybody without health insurance while competitors operate free of the burden of caring for those unable to pay.Q.Consider the following factors which may or may not have contributed to the overburdening of hospitals.1. Federal law.2. Failure to pass legislation which would have reduced the problem.3. Limited access to medical care for the poor.Which of the above factors did not contribute?a)Only 1b)2 and 3c)None of themd)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about The recent news that local hospitals have had to reroute seriously ill patients because the community’s critical-care beds are full, is worrisome. Earlier this week, four of the six local hospitals ran out of space for the critically ill and had to turn people away.Federal law requires hospitals to treat anyone who walks in. As a result of having to treat large numbers of uninsured patients, the emergency rooms often become an economic drain on their hospitals. Doctors now want to set up their own free-standing ambulatory surgical facilities and diagnostic centres. Critics contend that this would leave hospitals with less revenue and the same number of indigents to treat.A bill was recently introduced to phase out the need for a “certificate of public need” for non-hospital-based facilities, provided those facilities met stringent regulations and requirements. This would have made it easier to set up alternative facilities to help indigent patients. The finance committee baulked at the hefty price and killed the bill, another casualty of a failed legislative session.Unfortunately, the problem of access to medical care for those of limited means is not going to go away anytime soon and, despite the well-intended regulations, too-full hospitals compromise everyone’s welfare. Healthy competition with small neighbor hood surgical and diagnostic centres may be what is necessary to help dampen rising medical costs. But under no circumstances should the hospitals be forced to care for everybody without health insurance while competitors operate free of the burden of caring for those unable to pay.Q.Consider the following factors which may or may not have contributed to the overburdening of hospitals.1. Federal law.2. Failure to pass legislation which would have reduced the problem.3. Limited access to medical care for the poor.Which of the above factors did not contribute?a)Only 1b)2 and 3c)None of themd)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The recent news that local hospitals have had to reroute seriously ill patients because the community’s critical-care beds are full, is worrisome. Earlier this week, four of the six local hospitals ran out of space for the critically ill and had to turn people away.Federal law requires hospitals to treat anyone who walks in. As a result of having to treat large numbers of uninsured patients, the emergency rooms often become an economic drain on their hospitals. Doctors now want to set up their own free-standing ambulatory surgical facilities and diagnostic centres. Critics contend that this would leave hospitals with less revenue and the same number of indigents to treat.A bill was recently introduced to phase out the need for a “certificate of public need” for non-hospital-based facilities, provided those facilities met stringent regulations and requirements. This would have made it easier to set up alternative facilities to help indigent patients. The finance committee baulked at the hefty price and killed the bill, another casualty of a failed legislative session.Unfortunately, the problem of access to medical care for those of limited means is not going to go away anytime soon and, despite the well-intended regulations, too-full hospitals compromise everyone’s welfare. Healthy competition with small neighbor hood surgical and diagnostic centres may be what is necessary to help dampen rising medical costs. But under no circumstances should the hospitals be forced to care for everybody without health insurance while competitors operate free of the burden of caring for those unable to pay.Q.Consider the following factors which may or may not have contributed to the overburdening of hospitals.1. Federal law.2. Failure to pass legislation which would have reduced the problem.3. Limited access to medical care for the poor.Which of the above factors did not contribute?a)Only 1b)2 and 3c)None of themd)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The recent news that local hospitals have had to reroute seriously ill patients because the community’s critical-care beds are full, is worrisome. Earlier this week, four of the six local hospitals ran out of space for the critically ill and had to turn people away.Federal law requires hospitals to treat anyone who walks in. As a result of having to treat large numbers of uninsured patients, the emergency rooms often become an economic drain on their hospitals. Doctors now want to set up their own free-standing ambulatory surgical facilities and diagnostic centres. Critics contend that this would leave hospitals with less revenue and the same number of indigents to treat.A bill was recently introduced to phase out the need for a “certificate of public need” for non-hospital-based facilities, provided those facilities met stringent regulations and requirements. This would have made it easier to set up alternative facilities to help indigent patients. The finance committee baulked at the hefty price and killed the bill, another casualty of a failed legislative session.Unfortunately, the problem of access to medical care for those of limited means is not going to go away anytime soon and, despite the well-intended regulations, too-full hospitals compromise everyone’s welfare. Healthy competition with small neighbor hood surgical and diagnostic centres may be what is necessary to help dampen rising medical costs. But under no circumstances should the hospitals be forced to care for everybody without health insurance while competitors operate free of the burden of caring for those unable to pay.Q.Consider the following factors which may or may not have contributed to the overburdening of hospitals.1. Federal law.2. Failure to pass legislation which would have reduced the problem.3. Limited access to medical care for the poor.Which of the above factors did not contribute?a)Only 1b)2 and 3c)None of themd)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The recent news that local hospitals have had to reroute seriously ill patients because the community’s critical-care beds are full, is worrisome. Earlier this week, four of the six local hospitals ran out of space for the critically ill and had to turn people away.Federal law requires hospitals to treat anyone who walks in. As a result of having to treat large numbers of uninsured patients, the emergency rooms often become an economic drain on their hospitals. Doctors now want to set up their own free-standing ambulatory surgical facilities and diagnostic centres. Critics contend that this would leave hospitals with less revenue and the same number of indigents to treat.A bill was recently introduced to phase out the need for a “certificate of public need” for non-hospital-based facilities, provided those facilities met stringent regulations and requirements. This would have made it easier to set up alternative facilities to help indigent patients. The finance committee baulked at the hefty price and killed the bill, another casualty of a failed legislative session.Unfortunately, the problem of access to medical care for those of limited means is not going to go away anytime soon and, despite the well-intended regulations, too-full hospitals compromise everyone’s welfare. Healthy competition with small neighbor hood surgical and diagnostic centres may be what is necessary to help dampen rising medical costs. But under no circumstances should the hospitals be forced to care for everybody without health insurance while competitors operate free of the burden of caring for those unable to pay.Q.Consider the following factors which may or may not have contributed to the overburdening of hospitals.1. Federal law.2. Failure to pass legislation which would have reduced the problem.3. Limited access to medical care for the poor.Which of the above factors did not contribute?a)Only 1b)2 and 3c)None of themd)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The recent news that local hospitals have had to reroute seriously ill patients because the community’s critical-care beds are full, is worrisome. Earlier this week, four of the six local hospitals ran out of space for the critically ill and had to turn people away.Federal law requires hospitals to treat anyone who walks in. As a result of having to treat large numbers of uninsured patients, the emergency rooms often become an economic drain on their hospitals. Doctors now want to set up their own free-standing ambulatory surgical facilities and diagnostic centres. Critics contend that this would leave hospitals with less revenue and the same number of indigents to treat.A bill was recently introduced to phase out the need for a “certificate of public need” for non-hospital-based facilities, provided those facilities met stringent regulations and requirements. This would have made it easier to set up alternative facilities to help indigent patients. The finance committee baulked at the hefty price and killed the bill, another casualty of a failed legislative session.Unfortunately, the problem of access to medical care for those of limited means is not going to go away anytime soon and, despite the well-intended regulations, too-full hospitals compromise everyone’s welfare. Healthy competition with small neighbor hood surgical and diagnostic centres may be what is necessary to help dampen rising medical costs. But under no circumstances should the hospitals be forced to care for everybody without health insurance while competitors operate free of the burden of caring for those unable to pay.Q.Consider the following factors which may or may not have contributed to the overburdening of hospitals.1. Federal law.2. Failure to pass legislation which would have reduced the problem.3. Limited access to medical care for the poor.Which of the above factors did not contribute?a)Only 1b)2 and 3c)None of themd)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The recent news that local hospitals have had to reroute seriously ill patients because the community’s critical-care beds are full, is worrisome. Earlier this week, four of the six local hospitals ran out of space for the critically ill and had to turn people away.Federal law requires hospitals to treat anyone who walks in. As a result of having to treat large numbers of uninsured patients, the emergency rooms often become an economic drain on their hospitals. Doctors now want to set up their own free-standing ambulatory surgical facilities and diagnostic centres. Critics contend that this would leave hospitals with less revenue and the same number of indigents to treat.A bill was recently introduced to phase out the need for a “certificate of public need” for non-hospital-based facilities, provided those facilities met stringent regulations and requirements. This would have made it easier to set up alternative facilities to help indigent patients. The finance committee baulked at the hefty price and killed the bill, another casualty of a failed legislative session.Unfortunately, the problem of access to medical care for those of limited means is not going to go away anytime soon and, despite the well-intended regulations, too-full hospitals compromise everyone’s welfare. Healthy competition with small neighbor hood surgical and diagnostic centres may be what is necessary to help dampen rising medical costs. But under no circumstances should the hospitals be forced to care for everybody without health insurance while competitors operate free of the burden of caring for those unable to pay.Q.Consider the following factors which may or may not have contributed to the overburdening of hospitals.1. Federal law.2. Failure to pass legislation which would have reduced the problem.3. Limited access to medical care for the poor.Which of the above factors did not contribute?a)Only 1b)2 and 3c)None of themd)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The recent news that local hospitals have had to reroute seriously ill patients because the community’s critical-care beds are full, is worrisome. Earlier this week, four of the six local hospitals ran out of space for the critically ill and had to turn people away.Federal law requires hospitals to treat anyone who walks in. As a result of having to treat large numbers of uninsured patients, the emergency rooms often become an economic drain on their hospitals. Doctors now want to set up their own free-standing ambulatory surgical facilities and diagnostic centres. Critics contend that this would leave hospitals with less revenue and the same number of indigents to treat.A bill was recently introduced to phase out the need for a “certificate of public need” for non-hospital-based facilities, provided those facilities met stringent regulations and requirements. This would have made it easier to set up alternative facilities to help indigent patients. The finance committee baulked at the hefty price and killed the bill, another casualty of a failed legislative session.Unfortunately, the problem of access to medical care for those of limited means is not going to go away anytime soon and, despite the well-intended regulations, too-full hospitals compromise everyone’s welfare. Healthy competition with small neighbor hood surgical and diagnostic centres may be what is necessary to help dampen rising medical costs. But under no circumstances should the hospitals be forced to care for everybody without health insurance while competitors operate free of the burden of caring for those unable to pay.Q.Consider the following factors which may or may not have contributed to the overburdening of hospitals.1. Federal law.2. Failure to pass legislation which would have reduced the problem.3. Limited access to medical care for the poor.Which of the above factors did not contribute?a)Only 1b)2 and 3c)None of themd)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The recent news that local hospitals have had to reroute seriously ill patients because the community’s critical-care beds are full, is worrisome. Earlier this week, four of the six local hospitals ran out of space for the critically ill and had to turn people away.Federal law requires hospitals to treat anyone who walks in. As a result of having to treat large numbers of uninsured patients, the emergency rooms often become an economic drain on their hospitals. Doctors now want to set up their own free-standing ambulatory surgical facilities and diagnostic centres. Critics contend that this would leave hospitals with less revenue and the same number of indigents to treat.A bill was recently introduced to phase out the need for a “certificate of public need” for non-hospital-based facilities, provided those facilities met stringent regulations and requirements. This would have made it easier to set up alternative facilities to help indigent patients. The finance committee baulked at the hefty price and killed the bill, another casualty of a failed legislative session.Unfortunately, the problem of access to medical care for those of limited means is not going to go away anytime soon and, despite the well-intended regulations, too-full hospitals compromise everyone’s welfare. Healthy competition with small neighbor hood surgical and diagnostic centres may be what is necessary to help dampen rising medical costs. But under no circumstances should the hospitals be forced to care for everybody without health insurance while competitors operate free of the burden of caring for those unable to pay.Q.Consider the following factors which may or may not have contributed to the overburdening of hospitals.1. Federal law.2. Failure to pass legislation which would have reduced the problem.3. Limited access to medical care for the poor.Which of the above factors did not contribute?a)Only 1b)2 and 3c)None of themd)All of theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.