Class 10 Exam  >  Class 10 Questions  >  Which was not the provision in the Belgian Co... Start Learning for Free
Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?
  • a)
    Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central government
  • b)
    Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic group
  • c)
    Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representation
  • d)
    The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issues
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution...
Belgian Constitution Provisions

The Belgian Constitution is the supreme law of Belgium, providing a framework for the functioning of the country's political, social, and economic systems. It was first adopted in 1831 and has undergone several amendments since then.

Equal Representation of Dutch and French-speaking Ministers

One of the provisions of the Belgian Constitution is that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in the central government. This provision ensures equal representation of both linguistic communities in the government and reflects the federal nature of the Belgian state.

Special Laws and Linguistic Groups

Another provision of the Belgian Constitution is that some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic group. This provision recognizes the linguistic diversity of the country and ensures that laws that affect the rights and interests of linguistic minorities are passed only with their consent.

Brussels Government and Equal Representation

The Belgian Constitution also provides for a separate government for the Brussels-Capital Region, in which both communities have equal representation. This provision recognizes the unique linguistic and cultural identity of Brussels and ensures that both linguistic communities have a say in the governance of the region.

Community Government and Cultural Issues

The community government has significant powers regarding cultural, educational, and language-related issues. However, the provision of the Belgian Constitution that is not correct is that the community government has no power regarding cultural, educational, and language-related issues. In fact, the community government has exclusive competence in these areas and is responsible for the promotion and protection of the language, culture, and education of its community.

Conclusion

In summary, the Belgian Constitution contains several provisions that ensure the protection of linguistic and cultural diversity and the representation of both linguistic communities in the government. These provisions reflect the federal nature of the Belgian state and ensure that the rights and interests of all citizens are respected.
Free Test
Community Answer
Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution...
Option (d)is the ans because community government can take decisions related to its cultural, language and educational related issues. This is mentioned in the constitution of Belgium.
Attention Class 10 Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 10 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 10.
Explore Courses for Class 10 exam

Similar Class 10 Doubts

Sri Lanka emerged as an independent country in 1948. The leaders of the Sinhala community sought to secure dominance over government by virtue of their majority. As a result, the democratically elected government adopted a series of MAJORITARIAN measures to establish Sinhala supremacy. In 1956, an Act was passed to recognise Sinhala as the only official language, thus disregarding Tamil. The governments followed preferential policies that favoured Sinhala applicants for university positions and government jobs. A new constitution stipulated that the state shall protect and foster Buddhism. All these government measures coming one after the other, gradually increased the feeling of alienation among the Sri Lankan Tamils. They felt that none of the major political parties led by the Buddhist Sinhala leaders was sensitive to their language and culture. They felt that the constitution and government policies denied them equal political rights, discriminated against them in getting jobs and other opportunities and ignored their interests. As a result, the relations between the Sinhala and Tamil communities strained over time. The Sri Lankan Tamils launched parties and struggles for the recognition of Tamil as an official language, for regional autonomy and equality of opportunity in securing education and jobs. But their demand for more autonomy to provinces populated by the Tamils was repeatedly denied. By 1980s several political organisations were formed demanding an independent Tamil Eelam (stat e) in northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka. . As a result, thousands of people of both the communities were killed. Many families were forced to leave the country as refugees and many more lost their livelihoods. The distrust between the two communities turned into widespread conflict. It soon turned into a CIVIL WAR. Sri Lanka’s population is comprised of 75 percent Sinhalese and 24 percent Tamil speakers (11% Sri Lankan Tamils, 9% Moors, and 4% Indian Tamils), with smaller communities of Malays, Burghers, and others. The Sri Lankan civil war, which ended in 2009, was triggered in part by the introduction of language policies that created divisions along ethnic and linguistic lines.What were the majoritarian measures adopted by the democratically elected government in Sri Lanka in the 1950s and how did they contribute to the strained relations between the Sinhala and Tamil communities?

Read the source given below and answer the questions that follows:Sri Lanka emerged as an independent country in 1948. The leaders of the Sinhala community sought to secure dominance over government by virtue of their majority. As a result, the democratically elected government adopted a series of MAJORITARIAN measures to establish Sinhala supremacy. In 1956, an Act was passed to recognise Sinhala as the only official language, thus disregarding Tamil. The governments followed preferential policies that favoured Sinhala applicants for university positions and government jobs. A new constitution stipulated that the state shall protect and foster Buddhism. All these government measures coming one after the other, gradually increased the feeling of alienation among the Sri Lankan Tamils. They felt that none of the major political parties led by the Buddhist Sinhala leaders was sensitive to their language and culture. They felt that the constitution and government policies denied them equal political rights, discriminated against them in getting jobs and other opportunities and ignored their interests. As a result, the relations between the Sinhala and Tamil communities strained over time. The Sri Lankan Tamils launched parties and struggles for the recognition of Tamil as an official language, for regional autonomy and equality of opportunity in securing education and jobs. But their demand for more autonomy to provinces populated by the Tamils was repeatedly denied. By 1980s several political organisations were formed demanding an independent Tamil Eelam (stat e) in northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka. The distrust between the two communities turned into widespread conflict. It soon turned into a CIVIL WAR. As a result, thousands of people of both the communities were killed. Many families were forced to leave the country as refugees and many more lost their livelihoods.Q. What is the prudential reason behind Power Sharing?

Read the source given below and answer the questions that follows:Sri Lanka emerged as an independent country in 1948. The leaders of the Sinhala community sought to secure dominance over government by virtue of their majority. As a result, the democratically elected government adopted a series of MAJORITARIAN measures to establish Sinhala supremacy. In 1956, an Act was passed to recognise Sinhala as the only official language, thus disregarding Tamil. The governments followed preferential policies that favoured Sinhala applicants for university positions and government jobs. A new constitution stipulated that the state shall protect and foster Buddhism. All these government measures coming one after the other, gradually increased the feeling of alienation among the Sri Lankan Tamils. They felt that none of the major political parties led by the Buddhist Sinhala leaders was sensitive to their language and culture. They felt that the constitution and government policies denied them equal political rights, discriminated against them in getting jobs and other opportunities and ignored their interests. As a result, the relations between the Sinhala and Tamil communities strained over time. The Sri Lankan Tamils launched parties and struggles for the recognition of Tamil as an official language, for regional autonomy and equality of opportunity in securing education and jobs. But their demand for more autonomy to provinces populated by the Tamils was repeatedly denied. By 1980s several political organisations were formed demanding an independent Tamil Eelam (stat e) in northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka. The distrust between the two communities turned into widespread conflict. It soon turned into a CIVIL WAR. As a result, thousands of people of both the communities were killed. Many families were forced to leave the country as refugees and many more lost their livelihoods.Q. The ratio of Sinhala speaking and Tamil speaking in Sri Lanka is

Read the source given below and answer the questions that follows:Sri Lanka emerged as an independent country in 1948. The leaders of the Sinhala community sought to secure dominance over government by virtue of their majority. As a result, the democratically elected government adopted a series of MAJORITARIAN measures to establish Sinhala supremacy. In 1956, an Act was passed to recognise Sinhala as the only official language, thus disregarding Tamil. The governments followed preferential policies that favoured Sinhala applicants for university positions and government jobs. A new constitution stipulated that the state shall protect and foster Buddhism. All these government measures coming one after the other, gradually increased the feeling of alienation among the Sri Lankan Tamils. They felt that none of the major political parties led by the Buddhist Sinhala leaders was sensitive to their language and culture. They felt that the constitution and government policies denied them equal political rights, discriminated against them in getting jobs and other opportunities and ignored their interests. As a result, the relations between the Sinhala and Tamil communities strained over time. The Sri Lankan Tamils launched parties and struggles for the recognition of Tamil as an official language, for regional autonomy and equality of opportunity in securing education and jobs. But their demand for more autonomy to provinces populated by the Tamils was repeatedly denied. By 1980s several political organisations were formed demanding an independent Tamil Eelam (stat e) in northern and eastern parts of Sri Lanka. The distrust between the two communities turned into widespread conflict. It soon turned into a CIVIL WAR. As a result, thousands of people of both the communities were killed. Many families were forced to leave the country as refugees and many more lost their livelihoods.Q. Which is the official language of Sri Lanka?

Top Courses for Class 10

Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central governmentb)Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic groupc)Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representationd)The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issuesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central governmentb)Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic groupc)Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representationd)The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issuesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 10 2024 is part of Class 10 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 10 exam syllabus. Information about Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central governmentb)Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic groupc)Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representationd)The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issuesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 10 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central governmentb)Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic groupc)Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representationd)The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issuesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central governmentb)Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic groupc)Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representationd)The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issuesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 10. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 10 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central governmentb)Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic groupc)Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representationd)The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issuesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central governmentb)Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic groupc)Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representationd)The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issuesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central governmentb)Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic groupc)Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representationd)The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issuesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central governmentb)Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic groupc)Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representationd)The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issuesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which was not the provision in the Belgian Constitution?a)Constitution prescribes that the number of Dutch and French-speaking ministers shall be equal in central governmentb)Some special laws require the support of the majority of members from each linguistic groupc)Brussels has a separate govt, in which both communities have equal representationd)The community government has no power regarding cultural, educational and language-related issuesCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 10 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 10 exam

Top Courses for Class 10

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev