Question Description
Principle:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts:Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matter. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latters drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Rameshs table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Sureshs house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Rameshs consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.d)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intention.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts:Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matter. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latters drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Rameshs table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Sureshs house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Rameshs consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.d)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intention.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts:Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matter. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latters drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Rameshs table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Sureshs house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Rameshs consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.d)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intention.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts:Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matter. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latters drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Rameshs table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Sureshs house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Rameshs consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.d)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intention.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts:Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matter. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latters drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Rameshs table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Sureshs house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Rameshs consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.d)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intention.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts:Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matter. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latters drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Rameshs table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Sureshs house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Rameshs consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.d)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intention.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts:Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matter. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latters drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Rameshs table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Sureshs house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Rameshs consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.d)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intention.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts:Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matter. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latters drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Rameshs table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Sureshs house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Rameshs consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.d)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intention.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle:Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts:Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matter. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latters drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Rameshs table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Sureshs house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Rameshs consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.d)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intention.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.