CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly... Start Learning for Free
Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.
Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?
  • a)
    Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.
  • b)
    Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.
  • c)
    Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.
  • d)
    Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of...
Dishonest intention is clearly absent from the Act of Suresh. Without Dishonest intention, the act of Theft does not take place. Hence, Suresh is not liable.
Hence, option C is correct.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of...
Explanation:

Intention of Dishonesty:
- Suresh did not have any dishonest intentions while taking the pen. He simply took it absentmindedly while waiting for his friend.

Requirement of Dishonesty:
- In order for an act to be considered theft, there must be a dishonest intention to take someone else's property without their consent.

Lack of Intent to Take Property:
- Suresh did not have any intention to permanently deprive Ramesh of his pen. He simply took it temporarily and then forgot about it.

Absence of Theft:
- Since Suresh did not have any dishonest intentions and did not intend to permanently take the pen out of Ramesh's possession, he cannot be held liable for theft in this scenario.
Therefore, the correct answer is option 'C' - Suresh did not commit theft because he did not have dishonest intentions.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.d)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.d)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.d)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.d)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.d)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.d)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.d)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.d)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.d)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: Whoever, intending to dishonestly take any property out of the possession of another person, moves that property for such taking, is said to commit theft.Facts: Suresh went into the house of his friend Ramesh to discuss some important matters. Since Ramesh was not at home, Suresh waited for him in the latter's drawing room. When Ramesh did not turn up, Suresh took out a pen from Ramesh's table and wrote down a message and went home. While going back, by force of habit, he just dropped the pen into the pocket. Subsequently, he forgot about it. Since the pen happened to be a very valuable one, Ramesh complained to the police and the police traced the pen in Suresh's house. Is Suresh liable for theft?a)Suresh committed theft, because he took the pen without Ramesh's consent.b)Suresh committed theft, because he failed to return the pen.c)Suresh did not commit theft, because he did not have dishonest intentions.d)Suresh is not liable for theft but for Criminal Breach of Trust.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev