GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Experiments at India and US, among other coun... Start Learning for Free
Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures. 
  • a)
    suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in
  • b)
    suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?
  • c)
    suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in 
  • d)
    suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that enga...
Engaging Students in Class through Smartphones

Introduction:
The statement discusses the impact of using smartphones to engage students in the classroom. The experiments conducted in different countries suggest that the use of smartphones in class can improve students' understanding of the material.

Explanation:
The correct answer is option C. Let's discuss why:

Option A: This option is grammatically incorrect. The pronoun "its" does not have a clear antecedent. Also, the preposition "in" should be followed by the objective case "them" instead of the subjective case "it."

Option B: This option is also grammatically incorrect. The phrase "may otherwise have to be conveyed in" is incomplete and does not make sense.

Option C: This option is grammatically correct and conveys the intended meaning. The use of the phrase "engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smartphone" is appropriate, as it emphasizes the importance of using a device that students are comfortable with. The phrase "increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures" is also correct and clearly conveys the impact of using smartphones in class.

Option D: This option is grammatically incorrect. The use of the conjunction "while" is unnecessary, and the phrase "increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from" is incomplete and does not make sense.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, option C is the correct answer as it is grammatically correct and conveys the intended meaning. The statement emphasizes the importance of using smartphones to engage students in the classroom, which can lead to better understanding of the material.
Free Test
Community Answer
Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that enga...
Experiments - suggest (Plural noun followed by a singular verb)
Increases students understanding - their instead of it.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

A recent ball-catching experiment conducted in space by astronauts on board a space shuttle has led neuroscientists to conclude that the brain contains an internal model of gravity that is both powerful and persistent. At the same time, the experiment provided evidence that the brain can adapt to environments in which the force of downward acceleration is less pronounced than it is on earth.The experiment’s outcomes suggested that an individual’s understanding of motion is hard-wired from an earthcentric perspective. In the experiment, the astronauts were asked to catch balls released from a spring-loaded cannon.Analyzing data gathered from infrared tracking cameras and electrodes placed on the astronauts’ arms, McIntyre, the experiment’s principal designer, noticed that the astronauts’ anticipation of the ball’s motion was slightly off. Though they were able to catch the ball, the astronauts expected the ball to move faster than it did. He theorized that this over-anticipation is due to the fact that the brain expects the force of the earth’s gravity to act on the ball.The experiment also demonstrates the brain’s ability to adjust to conditions that run counter to its pre-set wiring.While the astronauts did not adapt to the conditions in space for some time, by day 15 of the experiment, the amplitude of the premature arm movements decreased and a new well-timed arm movement immediately preceded the catch. Upon returning to earth, the astronauts again mis-anticipated the ball’s motion, though this time the ball moved faster than anticipated. However, the astronauts were able to adjust back to the earth’s gravitational effect on the balls much more quickly than they had been able to adapt to the conditions in space.Many scientists view the findings as a first step in research that could have serious practical benefits. The ability of astronauts to safely explore space and investigate other planets is dependent on understanding the differences between our physical reactions on earth and elsewhere.On another level, understanding timing processes in the body might lead to the development of treatments for coordination problems experienced by individuals with certain types of brain damage.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that during the first two weeks of the experiment the astronauts, in attempting to catch the ball, tended to

For once, the whys are turning out to be more important than the hows. A study shows that consumers who become fixated onhowto achieve a goal probably face more difficulty in achieving their aims than people who think abstractly aboutwhythey want to do something. The authors of the study conducted four experiments to examine consumer behavior when it came to the goal of saving money. In one such experiment, some people were asked to make a specific plan to save money, whereas others were not asked to plan. Then some people were asked to focus on why they wanted to save money. Later on all participants were given the opportunity to buy candy. Subjects who were thinking concretely and formed a specific plan were less able to avoid the candy purchase than those who had not formed a plan at all.To elucidate the results, the authors cite the instance of person who wants to save money and hence makes a plan for achieving this goal. This person plans to save money by purchasing fewer clothing items at the mall. On investigating how this plan influences the persons response to other money-saving opportunities, for example, would the person be more likely to order a cheaper meal at a restaurant, avoid making an impulse purchase, or combine errands to save money on gas etc., the authors found that when people focus on concrete aspects of how they want to achieve goals, they become more closed-minded and consequently less likely to take advantage of opportunities that fall outside their plans. In contrast, people who focus on the why aspect are more likely to consider out-of-plan opportunities to achieve their goals.Furthermore, in the same experiment, the group that performed the best was the one that was asked to focus on the why and had formed a plan implicitly. Accordingly the authors conclude that planning is more effective when people plan with the complete understanding of why. They suggest that this strategy is particularly effective when the original plan turns out to be unrealistic in terms of feasibility or when other goal-directed activities become available.Each of the following is a statement that is mentioned with respect to the study described in the passage EXCEPT

A recent ball-catching experiment conducted in space by astronauts on board a space shuttle has led neuroscientists to conclude that the brain contains an internal model of gravity that is both powerful and persistent. At the same time, the experiment provided evidence that the brain can adapt to environments in which the force of downward acceleration is less pronounced than it is on earth.The experiment’s outcomes suggested that an individual’s understanding of motion is hard-wired from an earthcentric perspective. In the experiment, the astronauts were asked to catch balls released from a spring-loaded cannon.Analyzing data gathered from infrared tracking cameras and electrodes placed on the astronauts’ arms, McIntyre, the experiment’s principal designer, noticed that the astronauts’ anticipation of the ball’s motion was slightly off. Though they were able to catch the ball, the astronauts expected the ball to move faster than it did. He theorized that this over-anticipation is due to the fact that the brain expects the force of the earth’s gravity to act on the ball.The experiment also demonstrates the brain’s ability to adjust to conditions that run counter to its pre-set wiring.While the astronauts did not adapt to the conditions in space for some time, by day 15 of the experiment, the amplitude of the premature arm movements decreased and a new well-timed arm movement immediately preceded the catch. Upon returning to earth, the astronauts again mis-anticipated the ball’s motion, though this time the ball moved faster than anticipated. However, the astronauts were able to adjust back to the earth’s gravitational effect on the balls much more quickly than they had been able to adapt to the conditions in space.Many scientists view the findings as a first step in research that could have serious practical benefits. The ability of astronauts to safely explore space and investigate other planets is dependent on understanding the differences between our physical reactions on earth and elsewhere.On another level, understanding timing processes in the body might lead to the development of treatments for coordination problems experienced by individuals with certain types of brain damage.Q.The primary purpose of the passage is to

Read the passage and answer the question given below.The study of the analog position of mental representation has many fascinating branches which help illuminate the inner workings of our minds and how we perceive images in our mind‘s eye. This theory points to the link between the time it takes to solve mental problems and their complexity.In a now-famous study, Stephen Kosslyn asked subjects to imagine an animal, such as a rabbit, next to either an elephant or a fly. When the image was formed, Kosslyn would ask whether or not the target animal had a particular attribute. For example, Kosslyn might say, elephant, rabbit, and then leg. He found that it took subjects longer to answer when the target animal was next to the large animal than when it was next to the small animal. Kosslyn interpreted this to mean that subjects had to zoom in on the image to detect the particular feature. Just as one has difficulty seeing details on small objects, so the subjects could not simply mentally see details on the smaller object in their mental image.Second, Kosslyn and colleagues demonstrated that the time it takes to scan between two points depends on the distance between the two points [in a memorized image]. In one experiment, subjects memorized an array of letters separated by different distances. Kosslyn found that the farther apart the letters were from each other, the longer it took to answer questions about one of the letters. One of the principal hypotheses of the analog position of mental representation, which is the idea that mental processing requires one to move sequentially through all intervening steps to solve a problem, is that mental images have regular properties.In a similar experiment, Kosslyn had subjects memorize pictures of objects like a plane or a motorboat. Then he had them focus on one part of the object (e.g., the motor) and move to another (e.g., the anchor). He found that the time it took to determine whether the second part was present depended on the distance between the two parts in the memorized picture.Using a completely different paradigm, Shepard and Feng tested the amount of time that it would take for subjects to specify whether two arrows on unfolded blocks matched up. They found a linear relationship between the number of folds between the arrows and the time it took to make this judgment, suggesting that subjects went through a discrete series of organized steps in order to solve this problem.The final type of experiment showing that mental images have regular properties is perhaps the most famous: mental rotation experiments. In 1971, Shepard and Metzler tested subjects‘ abilities to make complex figure comparisons. They presented subjects with a three dimensional standard figure and a comparison figure which was either identical to the standard figure, or its mirror image; the comparison stimulus was rotated, either clockwise or into the third dimension. Shepard and Metzler found that the time needed to judge whether the comparison stimulus was identical or a mirror image depended directly on the size of the angle between the target orientation and the orientation of the standard.Q.According to the scanning experiments mentioned in the passage, it should take longer to scan longer distances because the subjects

A recent ball-catching experiment conducted in space by astronauts on board a space shuttle has led neuroscientists to conclude that the brain contains an internal model of gravity that is both powerful and persistent. At the same time, the experiment provided evidence that the brain can adapt to environments in which the force of downward acceleration is less pronounced than it is on earth.The experiment’s outcomes suggested that an individual’s understanding of motion is hard-wired from an earthcentric perspective. In the experiment, the astronauts were asked to catch balls released from a spring-loaded cannon.Analyzing data gathered from infrared tracking cameras and electrodes placed on the astronauts’ arms, McIntyre, the experiment’s principal designer, noticed that the astronauts’ anticipation of the ball’s motion was slightly off. Though they were able to catch the ball, the astronauts expected the ball to move faster than it did. He theorized that this over-anticipation is due to the fact that the brain expects the force of the earth’s gravity to act on the ball.The experiment also demonstrates the brain’s ability to adjust to conditions that run counter to its pre-set wiring.While the astronauts did not adapt to the conditions in space for some time, by day 15 of the experiment, the amplitude of the premature arm movements decreased and a new well-timed arm movement immediately preceded the catch. Upon returning to earth, the astronauts again mis-anticipated the ball’s motion, though this time the ball moved faster than anticipated. However, the astronauts were able to adjust back to the earth’s gravitational effect on the balls much more quickly than they had been able to adapt to the conditions in space.Many scientists view the findings as a first step in research that could have serious practical benefits. The ability of astronauts to safely explore space and investigate other planets is dependent on understanding the differences between our physical reactions on earth and elsewhere.On another level, understanding timing processes in the body might lead to the development of treatments for coordination problems experienced by individuals with certain types of brain damage.Q.According to the passage, research suggests that the brain’s built-in understanding of gravity is

Top Courses for GMAT

Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures.a)suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed inb)suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?c)suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed ind)suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures.a)suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed inb)suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?c)suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed ind)suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures.a)suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed inb)suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?c)suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed ind)suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures.a)suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed inb)suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?c)suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed ind)suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures.a)suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed inb)suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?c)suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed ind)suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures.a)suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed inb)suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?c)suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed ind)suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures.a)suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed inb)suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?c)suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed ind)suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures.a)suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed inb)suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?c)suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed ind)suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures.a)suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed inb)suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?c)suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed ind)suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Experiments at India and US, among other countries, suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed in traditional lectures.a)suggests that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increase its understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed inb)suggest that to engage students in class through familiar devices to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise have to be conveyed in ?c)suggest that engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases their understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed ind)suggest that while engaging students in class through a device as familiar to them as a smart phone increases the understanding of material that may otherwise be conveyed from ?Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev